Invasion of India: Doc

[SamantK]

You are not getting my point. I am not talking about a race. I am talking about history of Eastern Punjab. Porus is historically relevant for Eastern Punjab because his kingdom existed in this region. Even if some of his descendants have migrated to other regions with passage of time, they have basically moved on and become a part of other kingdoms.
My point is that Eastern Punjab does have independent history and Porus is part of it. Eastern Punjab was not always part of a united Hindustan.

Every land has a history, who denied that? east Punjab has a history, but that history is in the context of the Larger Indian sub-continent, Porus is described a hero because he helped Indian sub-continent from getting invaded. a good number would have been Christians now if not for him so it is intertwined. Also, you spoke about the native inhabitants of Punjab region which you believe were the descendants of the King Poru so I pointed out that the King is according to the history believed to be not from Indus Region. Also, IVC is considered the precursor to Dravidian race, so it is a mixed history not exclusive,,

Now you are talking about race.

i Was talking about History and facts.

Again, this discussion is not about race. This discussion is about exclusive history of Eastern Punjab region.

The discussion is about how Alexander could not invade the Indian sub-continent.