What's new

India - 1.4 billion people

population is biggest problem india is facing .



better you go to pakistan and help them with your knowledge .

The guy is a known racist....he has habbit of inciting us in the name of north india south indiam name..too...
 
.
The point is India has around 9% covered with water, 25% forest (with increasing trend) and arable land nearly twice the size of Pakistan. The numbers don't look promising for you, given your increasing population and decreasing water resources. Better deal? I think you know big and populous countries will always have its advantages.


Water scarcity issue in coming years has been blown out of proportion.

With 7,253 known glaciers, including 543 in the Chitral Valley, there is more glacial ice in Pakistan than anywhere on Earth outside the polar regions, according to various studies. Those glaciers feed rivers that account for about 75 percent of the stored-water supply in the country of at least 180-200 million.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c6e4accc5b1_story.html?utm_term=.c05d3cae6dc0

the republic of india has 5 times the population as pakistan.


It is actually 6.5 times, Google check...

KPK, Balochistan, gilgit baltistan and internal sindh were less populated as they we're arid regions (mountainious for GB case) and could not support large population like the Gangetic fertile plains.. Our largest state is Rajasthan which resembles those regions and has only a fraction of population of UP and bihar. you won't see a single living soul for miles in western Rajasthan.


KPK has about 22% forest cover and being increased with major tree plantation, also has lots of water resources, the largest dam in Pakistan Tarbela is located there, plus fruits orchards, other agrarian economy, and minerals, oil and gas too, the richest province in Pakistan actually if looked into the resources.


Baluchistan is sparsely populated but there are many regions with fruit orchards in large areas, produces the best dry fruits, apples, peaches, plums, cherries, pears, apricots.

Also has vast mineral, oil and gas, gold and copper and many precious minerals as well.
 
.
Water scarcity issue in coming years has been blown out of proportion.

With 7,253 known glaciers, including 543 in the Chitral Valley, there is more glacial ice in Pakistan than anywhere on Earth outside the polar regions, according to various studies. Those glaciers feed rivers that account for about 75 percent of the stored-water supply in the country of at least 180-200 million.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c6e4accc5b1_story.html?utm_term=.c05d3cae6dc0




It is actually 6.5 times, Google check...




KPK has about 22% forest cover and being increased with major tree plantation, also has lots of water resources, the largest dam in Pakistan Tarbela is located there, plus fruits orchards, other agrarian economy, and minerals, oil and gas too, the richest province in Pakistan actually if looked into the resources.


Baluchistan is sparsely populated but there are many regions with fruit orchards in large areas, produces the best dry fruits, apples, peaches, plums, cherries, pears, apricots.

Also has vast mineral, oil and gas, gold and copper and many precious minerals as well.
East Rajasthan has the same story.. But overall its still considered arid region compared to our most of our landmass. There is a difference between large fertile landmass with rivers and good amount of annual rain and some plantations.. There are mushroom plantations in Rajasthan. Most of the world population lives in asia as asia has those warm fertile lands while europe being cold remained less inhabited just like cold region in our countries too.
 
.
the republic of india has 5 times the population as pakistan. Not british india. There were no pakistanis before 1947, there were only indians. not modern indians, but british indians. and pop density does not change the fact we got most of the land jinnah wanted. The fact there are still over 200 million muslims in india proves that. And you tried to capture the independant state of kashmir in 47, but you failed. Instead we got the majority of it and there is NOTHING you can do to get it back, as the last 4 wars proved.



overall i think Bd got the worse deal. They lost large amounts of their territory to India, including their most impirtant city, kolkata. Not to mention many bengali speaking parts of Assam and tripura.




Evidence for your claims please.......:azn:

Pakistan is 7× smaller than india yet we control nearly 40% of Kashmir and there is NOTHING you guys can do about it despite those overwhelming odds......:azn:

Bar religion, indian so called "Muslims" are identical to indian hindus and sikhs. They are COMPLETELY different to Pakistanis and have got nothing to do with us or Islam in general.

PS We created a huge nation using land that ghandi and the other members of the indian leadership did not want to concede.........that too when we were outnumbered 5 to 1.........that in itself is a MASSIVE victory against virtually impossible odds......... :azn:
 
Last edited:
.
Evidence for your claims please.......:azn:

Pakistan is 7× smaller than india yet we control nearly 40% of Kashmir and there is NOTHING you guys can do about it despite those overwhelming odds......:azn:

Bar religion, indian so called "Muslims" are identical to indian hindus and sikhs. They are COMPLETELY different to Pakistanis and have got nothing to do with us or Islam in general.
it works both ways. there is nothing you can do to regain the territory you lost.

Water scarcity issue in coming years has been blown out of proportion.

With 7,253 known glaciers, including 543 in the Chitral Valley, there is more glacial ice in Pakistan than anywhere on Earth outside the polar regions, according to various studies. Those glaciers feed rivers that account for about 75 percent of the stored-water supply in the country of at least 180-200 million.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...c6e4accc5b1_story.html?utm_term=.c05d3cae6dc0




It is actually 6.5 times, Google check...




KPK has about 22% forest cover and being increased with major tree plantation, also has lots of water resources, the largest dam in Pakistan Tarbela is located there, plus fruits orchards, other agrarian economy, and minerals, oil and gas too, the richest province in Pakistan actually if looked into the resources.


Baluchistan is sparsely populated but there are many regions with fruit orchards in large areas, produces the best dry fruits, apples, peaches, plums, cherries, pears, apricots.

Also has vast mineral, oil and gas, gold and copper and many precious minerals as well.
thats great but India overall yields greater production of agricultural goods. For example india is the largest rice producer and ranks near the top in production of commodities such as jute, bananas, coconuts, mangos, etc. look i am away right now and it is hard to post links on my phone but i will definitel get back to you. And yes, water shortage is an issue affecying both our countries
 
.
it works both ways. there is nothing you can do to regain the territory you lost.


thats great but India overall yields greater production of agricultural goods. For example india is the largest rice producer and ranks near the top in production of commodities such as jute, bananas, coconuts, mangos, etc. look i am away right now and it is hard to post links on my phone but i will definitel get back to you. And yes, water shortage is an issue affecying both our countries




So then by your own logic, india must be the biggest loser.........:lol:.........india can't get back 40% of Kashmir which Pakistan controls DESPITE being 7x bigger than Pakistan nor can they EVER reclaim territory from Pakistan that we took in order to create Pakistan in the first place........................:rofl:
 
.
So then by your own logic, india must be the biggest loser..................india can't get back 40% of Kashmir which Pakistan controls DESPITE being 7x bigger than Pakistan nor can they EVER reclaim territory from Pakistan that we took in order to create Pakistan in the first place........................
Fine we are a loser. You happy? doesnt change the fact that we contol the majority of kashmir and left you guys with a moth eaten pakistan as per your national founder's own words. We can also commit as many human rights violations as per your media as we want, and there is NOTHING you can do to stop us or take back the territory we took from you.:-)
 
.
Fine we are a loser. You happy? doesnt change the fact that we contol the majority of kashmir and left you guys with a moth eaten pakistan as per your national founder's own words. We can also commit as many human rights violations as per your media as we want, and there is NOTHING you can do to stop us or take back the territory we took from you.:-)


Neither does that change the fact that we took 35% of indian territory even though we were 5 times smaller in number compared to you lot and control 40% of Kashmir despite those impossible odds. We dismembered india despite ghandi and other indian leaders trying their very best to stop it...............:azn:...............and there is NOTHING indian kind can do about it despite being more than 7 times bigger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weaons systems whilst we are denied this privilege..........:azn:

it works both ways. there is nothing you can do to regain the territory you lost.


thats great but India overall yields greater production of agricultural goods. For example india is the largest rice producer and ranks near the top in production of commodities such as jute, bananas, coconuts, mangos, etc. look i am away right now and it is hard to post links on my phone but i will definitel get back to you. And yes, water shortage is an issue affecying both our countries




Can you provide evidence for your claims or they are all lies just like everything else indians say...........8-)
 
.
Neither does that change the fact that we took 35% of indian territory even though we were 5 times smaller in number compared to you lot and control 40% of Kashmir despite those impossible odds. We dismembered india despite ghandi and other indian leaders trying their very best to stop it...............:azn:...............and there is NOTHING indian kind can do about it despite being more than 7 times bigger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weaons systems whilst we are denied this privilege..........:azn:






Can you provide evidence for your claims or they are all lies just like everything else indians say...........8-)
For the last time You didnt partition "India" the british did. And all provincea of pakistan were muslim majority. We still took most of the territory jinnah wanted which is why he described pakistan as "moth eaten." Although we got areas then ruled by muslims or majority muslims, you did not take any majority hindu or sikh areas.
As for the kashmir war, back then our millitary was disorganized and much smaller. remember nehru was a pacifist who hated war and thought india did not need an army. it is still impressive how we invaded the then independent state of kashmir and prevented you from taking significant parts of kashmir. To this day you have tried and failed to capture the territory we took from you but have failed miserably. To this day, there is NOTHING you can do to prevent your kashmiri brothers from getting killed by the Indian Army.
And it is a fact we are one of the most agriculturaly productive countries in the world. For example we are the largest producers of jute and bananas,and several other commodities. Like i said it is hard to post links on my phone so I will post them when I get home
 
.
For the last time You didnt partition "India" the british did. And all provincea of pakistan were muslim majority. We still took most of the territory jinnah wanted which is why he described pakistan as "moth eaten." Although we got areas then ruled by muslims or majority muslims, you did not take any majority hindu or sikh areas.
As for the kashmir war, back then our millitary was disorganized and much smaller. remember nehru was a pacifist who hated war and thought india did not need an army. it is still impressive how we invaded the then independent state of kashmir and prevented you from taking significant parts of kashmir. To this day you have tried and failed to capture the territory we took from you but have failed miserably. To this day, there is NOTHING you can do to prevent your kashmiri brothers from getting killed by the Indian Army.
And it is a fact we are one of the most agriculturaly productive countries in the world. For example we are the largest producers of jute and bananas,and several other commodities. Like i said it is hard to post links on my phone so I will post them when I get home




The British did it on OUR behest.........the results were the same..........:azn:..........despite being more than 7× bigger than Pakistan and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege, india remains FAR TOO weak, powerless and incapable of fighting the Pakistan army. So much so, to date, despite these IMPOSSIBLE odds, we have prevented india from taking back 40% of Kashmir and 35% of former indian territory............that is a military achievement that NO NATION in the ENTIRE history of mankind has managed to emulate................:azn:.........:D..........and there is NOTHING indian kind can do to get that conquered former indian territory back again EVER...............:chilli:

I hope you're not getting your info from the same indian source which claims that indians invented computers, the internet, satellites, jets, spaceships, submarines, cars etc over 5000 years ago..............:lol::

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ia-invented-internet-thousands-years-ago.html

@waz @WAJsal @Horus Guys take note of this indian. He is making comments that are mocking the genocide of Kashmiris by the indian army. He has done this in several posts.
 
.
Evidence for your claims please.......:azn:

Pakistan is 7× smaller than india yet we control nearly 40% of Kashmir and there is NOTHING you guys can do about it despite those overwhelming odds......:azn:

Bar religion, indian so called "Muslims" are identical to indian hindus and sikhs. They are COMPLETELY different to Pakistanis and have got nothing to do with us or Islam in general.

PS We created a huge nation using land that ghandi and the other members of the indian leadership did not want to concede.........that too when we were outnumbered 5 to 1.........that in itself is a MASSIVE victory against virtually impossible odds......... :azn:

Pakistan was not always 7x smaller - it was slightly bigger no?

Indian Muslims believe that Pakistan has nothing to do with Islam. At the end of the day, when India was standing by with the Palestinian cause, Pakistanis were happily taking Israeli weapons while Israel dubbed Arafat a terrorist.

The Kashmir you took, you took before its accession with India. After the accession, you have only lost land.
 
.
you are not understanding the simpoe fact that there was no Republic of India before 1947. On august 15 the maharaj of kashmir chose to be independent. You tried to take his kingdom, bit yollu failed when we sent our army and defeated you, leaving you with only a small part of kashmir. By your logic, India also lost burma, Yemen, and Oman, since those were at one point administered under British india.

Maybe you can try a simple google search, because that will confirm everything i have said about india's agricultural productivity as facts. If you are too lazy to do that, you will have to wait a couple of hours until get back home.




So then the hindu idea of a united india is false as it never existed before the 15th of August 1947? So before that date it was up for grabs by anyone?............That in no way negates or offsets the fact that india has not been able to take back 40% of Kashmir from an enemy that is more than 7 times smaller than india and doesn't have access to the world's most advanced weapons systems like india does...........:lol:...........looks like you are clutching at straws and looking for excuses to explain your military's failure at not being able to defeat an enemy despite those OVERWHELMING odds..............:azn:

you are not understanding the simpoe fact that there was no Republic of India before 1947. On august 15 the maharaj of kashmir chose to be independent. You tried to take his kingdom, bit yollu failed when we sent our army and defeated you, leaving you with only a small part of kashmir. By your logic, India also lost burma, Yemen, and Oman, since those were at one point administered under British india.

Maybe you can try a simple google search, because that will confirm everything i have said about india's agricultural productivity as facts. If you are too lazy to do that, you will have to wait a couple of hours until get back home.


I am simply pointing out we are free to do whatever you want with Kashmiris since you are helpless to protect them. Just be glad we do not have the same inferiority conplex as you, or else kashmiris would be in for a worse time than they already have thanks to terrorists. Why do hate Indians so much? Was your grandma killed by a sikh during partition? BTW I do not hate pakistanis. In fact, I have had good discussions with many Pakistani members here. I really do not know wha your problem is.



Think your inferiority complex is caused by the following..............:lol::

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/condoms-too-big-indian-men-video-1430429
 
.
You sound bitter about the Kashmiris. Your mama must have been getting pleasure from a Kishmiri lund while your papa watched. heard your mama liked it in every hole and orifice............:lol:





indian so called "Muslims" are not Muslims as they worship and are the slaves of idol worshippers. That negates them being Muslims.

Can you provide evidence that Pakistan has lost land and took weapons from Israel?..............That in no way offsets the lose of 35% of indian territory in the creation of Pakistan on August the 14th 1947


Another misconception. Pakistan came into being the same moment as India did - on August 15, 1947. Read the Indian Independence Act passed by British Parliament which created the 2 dominions of India and Pakistan.

So, no - Britain lost her crown jewel on August 15, 1947 - 65% became the dominion of India, rest was Pakistan. I don't know when you became a republic or till when you were still under the British crown. India was still under the crown till 1951.

And here is you happily buying Israeli weapons -
https://rense.com/general39/pakh.htm
 
.
So then the hindu idea of a united india is false as it never existed before the 15th of August 1947? So before that date it was up for grabs by anyone?............That in no way negates or offsets the fact that india has not been able to take back 40% of Kashmir from an enemy that is more than 7 times smaller than india and doesn't have access to the world's most advanced weapons systems like india does...........:lol:...........looks like you are clutching at straws and looking for excuses to explain your military's failure at not being able to defeat an enemy despite those OVERWHELMING odds..............:azn:





Think your inferiority complex is caused by the following..............:lol::

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/condoms-too-big-indian-men-video-1430429
Yes we failed just like you failed to conquer all muslim majority parts of India so you were left with a moth-eaten Pakistan. modern day pakistan definitely looks a lot smaler than the mughals under aurangzeb(who was born in india btw). Have you ever considered we are not interested in taking your part of kashmir? we already have the most important parts. Instead, it was you guys who attacked us and failed miserably to capture the land we took from you.

And of course, you cant counter my facts so you bring up ky penis. You definitely sound like you are compensating for something. You literally bring up penises in EVERY discussion.
 
.
Yes we failed just like you failed to conquer all muslim majority parts of India so you were left with a moth-eaten Pakistan. modern day pakistan definitely looks a lot smaler than the mughals under aurangzeb(who was born in india btw). Have you ever considered we are not interested in taking your part of kashmir? we already have the most important parts. Instead, it was you guys who attacked us and failed miserably to capture the land we took from you.

And of course, you cant counter my facts so you bring up ky penis. You definitely sound like you are compensating for something. You literally bring up penises in EVERY discussion.




So you were happy to lose 35% of indian territory despite being 7x larger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege? Do you have the same area of india as before being conquered by the Mughals? Can I have evidence of Pakistan trying to conquer Kashmir and then being defeated by india?

Another misconception. Pakistan came into being the same moment as India did - on August 15, 1947. Read the Indian Independence Act passed by British Parliament which created the 2 dominions of India and Pakistan.

So, no - Britain lost her crown jewel on August 15, 1947 - 65% became the dominion of India, rest was Pakistan. I don't know when you became a republic or till when you were still under the British crown. India was still under the crown till 1951.

And here is you happily buying Israeli weapons -
https://rense.com/general39/pakh.htm



Can you please use a source that is not from Jeff Rense who claims that the British Royal family are reptillian aliens from outer space...... :lol:

The article says nothing about Pakistan buying israeli weapons but that they were invoved in the 3rd party transfer of weapons to Pakistan.........can you use a credible source that is not from a dubious 2003 one.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom