What's new

'If Rashid holds 1000 beef parties, we will thrash him thousand times'

They can eat any other meat in the world. Beef is a no-no in India.

The one at fault here is the MLA who ate beef. He should not pretend to be innocent, when beef has always been illegal in India for thousands of years. He very well knew that he was going to be beaten, and just did this for cheap publicity stunt to get some media attention.


So India is illegalizing beef... So have both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia illegalized pork?
 
.
People should have independence in choice what they like to eat, day by day under Modi's supervision Indian is becoming radical Hindu country just like Afghanistan under Taliban and their fate not be different from Taliban and Afghanistan.

All most every country has some ethical codes of its own. Even within India, such codes vary from state to state. For example, in some state you can not drink liquor in public places, in some there is no bar. So, if that liberality to have a choice to eat anything they want does not stand well in any practicality, why singling particularly beef out? Contrary to common presumption, people in India does not have Independence to eat anything they want at all, given the ban on beef consumption is under directive principles in the constitution.
 
.
We are not supporting his role as MNA but as human being he should have right to select a meal of his choice.
different countries different rules. Btw how does it matter to anyone in Pakistan ?

guy is a MLA means he is by law Indian citizen and recognize J&K as part of India.
 
.
Not so, local sensitivities have to respected as it is done in most of Islamic countries. Alcohol and certain food items are prohibited or restricted in sale in many countries - India is not an exception in this regard.
Banned for Muslims only christian and Hindu in Pakistan can eat pork and drink alcohol. Not a single person killed in Pakistan for eating his / her choice.
 
. . .
Banned for Muslims only christian in Pakistan can eat pork and drink alcohol. Not a single person killed in Pakistan for eating his / her choice.

But why? You sir said

People should have independence in choice what they like to eat

Why exclude Muslims from this? Aren't Muslim people? Why restrict freedom to eat whatever the heck one wants for Muslims?

Either extend your argument to it's logical conclusion or retract it, please don't use convenience and intellectual paucity to insert selectivity.

Regards
 
.
In states like kerala, tamil nadu eating beef isn't a crime. How JK implemented such a law when the majority are muslims?
 
.
These Hindu tactics will take them nowhere but only annoy Muslims of India.

Eagerly waiting a very own "New Pakistan" within India.
 
.
But why? You sir said



Why exclude Muslims from this? Aren't Muslim people? Why restrict freedom to eat whatever the heck they want for Muslims?
We are following Islam and if somebody (muslim) choose to drink alcohol or what ever he will be fined and punished by law not by lynching.
 
.
In states like kerala, tamil nadu eating beef isn't a crime. How JK implemented such a law when the majority are muslims?

This law was created explicitly to harass Muslims. It give the gov there a pretext to jail someone.

Banned for Muslims only christian and Hindu in Pakistan can eat pork and drink alcohol. Not a single person killed in Pakistan for eating his / her choice.

Why can't India ban beef for Hindus only and allow other faith to consume beef?
 
.
We are following Islam and if somebody (muslim) choose to drink alcohol or what ever he will be fined and punished by law not by lynching.

Again fallacious logic - first you say everyone should be free to eat whatever they want - next you say everyone but Muslims.

This is intellectual dishonesty. Either you stand for complete freedom for all even Muslims - in which case I salute you or you don't get to comment on freedom at all.

In attempt to bait and troll Indians one must first look at their own weaknesses.

Regards
 
.
This law was created explicitly to harass Muslims. It give the gov there a pretext to jail someone.



Why can't India ban beef for Hindus only and allow other faith to consume beef?
A valid point same like Pakistan if Hindu don't like beef or it is forbiden for them put ban only for Hindus.
 
.
@Slav Defence
He promised to you for not trolling. Pls check his above post

Kindly highlight the point I am violating? Remember you tagged me in this thread I didn't commented on my own.

Trolling means:
1-Abusing nationality
2-Harassment
3-Show-off of ill-informed knowledge
4-Troll threads
5-Manipulation
6-Representing CT as facts
7-Get messed up and driving others crazy
9-Vulgarity
10-Profanity in name of sarcasm

regards
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have not initiated this thread to learn definition of trolling.I want to ask that how many of you could give up trolling?

On a second thought, I will edit that post of mine don't want to indulge in "tu tu main main"
 
.
Again fallacious logic - first you say everyone should be free to eat whatever they want - next you say everyone but Muslims.

This is intellectual dishonesty. Either you stand for complete freedom for all even Muslims - in which case I salute you or you don't get to comment on freedom at all.

In attempt to bait and troll Indians one must first look at their own weaknesses.

Regards
What a immature post alcohol and pork ban for Muslim only because it forbiden in Islam Sam like beef for Hindus them put ban for Hindus only why the hell you people dictating others not to eat what is forbiden for you.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom