Spitfighter
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,443
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
deleted. wrong thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not putting words in your mouth, what else would you mean with a stupid question like that. Being patriotic is one thing but being an idiot is another, i honestly cannot believe that you think PAF wont catch Brahmos on its radar. Now, i am not going to baby you as you want me to, here are two excellent links, read them and comprehend it. Put some damn effort in instead of finding shortcuts.
Infrared Countermeasures Systems
ERIEYE AEW&C / S100B Argus
seneor good morning & treat thrm a bit kindlyYour links still don't answer the question "How can your radar track a heat emitting body ??"
And No matter what damn efforts you put or freaking researches you do to copy and paste from other defense forms.... you still won't get the answer... hence its better to admit that your ridiculous claims about radars detecting a heat emitting body was a complete non-sense which you puked out of sheer patriotism, idiotism, fanboism.. and etc.. etc.. isms...
Nobody's running away. You refuse to accept reality and want to believe in the BrahMos. Same reaction as Indians in that other thread.
How many natural phenomena do you know on this planet that have a big as$ heat signature and that move at mach 3? According to you, Indian satellites can see people sitting in their backyards, but other countries, which can already track ballistic missiles, can't track such a huge heat signature moving at an unnatural speed -- especially over a cold ocean.
Dear Darky evryone knows that Pakistani missile technology is far better than India and i think you also know that.
seneor good morning & treat thrm a bit kindly
There are many natural and unnatural phenomenon which emit more heat...
How will your IR detectors and tracking equipment distinguish a 50degree Celsius object of the size of brahmos in say a 30-35 degree Celsius heated sea and almost 50-55 degree Celsius heated sands of the Thar desert...
How many of these natural phenomena travel at mach 3?
The combination of heat signature and high speed are dead giveaways for BrahMos.
How many of these natural phenomena travel at mach 3?
The combination of heat signature and high speed are dead giveaways for BrahMos.
Dear Darky evryone knows that Pakistani missile technology is far better than India and i think you also know that.
Lets say you detect the missiles with the infrared camera you have placed on your satellite(which btw you don't have) then what?
What has Mach 3 got to do with tracking.... only think which it can do on contrary is make tracking difficult since the path would be a horizontal cruise....
If according to you a satellite were to track a brahmos then tracking fighter planes were to be a lot easier....
Current technology allows for tracking of naval ships in ISRO but yes NASA has satellites which can track an MBT in an urban environment but for that the satellites need to be pre-programmed and extensive coverage is required.... what you need to realize is that detection and tracking are two different things altogether... you still detect a vehicle near your house using google earth.. but won't be able to track its movement..
As notorious_eagle pointed out, our AWACS should be enough since they already see beyond the BrahMos range. Pakistan may or may not have interceptor technology, I don't know. The point is that the technology exists in the west and, quite possibly, China.
Systems can already track ballistic missiles moving much faster than mach3 and you feel that a 538C object will simply vanish from view.
For detecting a low flying cruise missile you need Airborne radars(aerostat or Awacs) having ability differentiate target from underlying ground clutter.
To intercept any missile(or flying object) the speed of interceptor should be higher than speed of the target.(so that it manouvere at same or higher speed than target).
Not hard to differentiate a 538C body from "ground clutter".
Wrong.
The missile is coming at you, i.e. at the interceptor. The interceptor is not chasing the missile; it just has to get in its way.
A brick wall travelling at ZERO km/h will intercept the BrahMos just fine.
A million rounds from a MetalStorm or similar only have to get in its way.
A heat seeking missile only has to get in its way.
The rest of the post is irrelevant since it relies on the above faulty premise.
Systems can already track ballistic missiles moving much faster than mach3 and you feel that a 538C object will simply vanish from view.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/53380-brahmos-high.html#post783777Yes at mach 2.8 the Brahmos is really fast, at nearly 3 times the speed of sound the estimated skin temperature of the missile is approximately 323 K or 49.85 deg C at 37,000 ft.
Are you serious....
Or just blabbermouthing what ever comes there.... like your friend notorious
Here's what your esteemed poster had to say about surface temperature of brahmos....
http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/53380-brahmos-high.html#post783777
Think before what you say... and think again when you write that to someone.
You two are just making a laughing stock of yourselves here with No knowledge about the subject at all....