one thing to consider - you don't need to wait another 5 years to get this, much cheaper than LCA, and the performance is even better.
Deal! You, sire, can go convince the Chinese govt to sell aircraft to India!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
one thing to consider - you don't need to wait another 5 years to get this, much cheaper than LCA, and the performance is even better.
Deal! You, sire, can go convince the Chinese govt to sell aircraft to India!
ok so umm...
F-404: total thrust # 17,700 lbf (78.7 kN) with afterburner
RD-33: 8,300 kgf (81.3 kN, 18,285 lbf) with afterburner
and these are from the "official" GE and Kimov sites
and if lca weighs less than the jf-17, either there isn't a problem with the lca, or there is a problem.
but that means if there is a problem with the lca and not with the jf-17 than that must mean all of those pakistani generals must making false statements about the jf-17. if 17k lb thrust is enough for jf-17 to carry full weapons load than why cant the lighter lca carry the same?
and idk anything about g-limit or anything...
but TVC will solve all of those problems
You are Missing one Basic fact.
LCA is NOT going to be India's Prime Defence while JF-17 will be Your Main Fighter Jet.
Where will JF17 Stand when Its Knocked down by Mig-29 BVR ( Leave aside the Mighty SU- 30 MKI infront of it ) ?
LCA will replace the MiG 21s.. Its Mainly for Number and to Boost the MCA Project.
1. jf-17 cant be datalinked with eyrie, only to Y-8 which is inferior to eyrie.
2. chinese engines aren't better than Russian engines
very poor information you have! French have offered pakistan M53 currently used on Mirage-2000.3. European engines=too expensive and no news report confirming it
Once they are given MLU they will be more advance then any of your 4th generation MRCA and lol that joke LCA comes no where close to it. well buddy just to let you know, PAF has had more experiance with your Fighters we literally know mirage-2000, mig-29, su-27 inside out! lol4. F-16 although good isn't the best F-16 out there and ur neighbor has experience training with it
well ya kind of.5. jf-17 and j-10 aren't compatible with American weapons
lol... you got to be kiddin me?!6. paf pilots aren't superior, for 1 reason: money with a 3 billion dollar budget for armed forces 1/3rd the size of ur neighbor, u need 10 billion to do what ur neighbor can.
6? first of all only 3 by 20127. rcs doesn't matter if there are 6 Phalcons with 500 km range looking into pakistan
okay no comments on that..u think just b.c. paf has bvr means it can challenge anyone, that my friend is wrong. bvr is very complex, after u fire and ur enemy fire, u must dodge it, deploy ew countermeasures/flares, and guide ur own missiles. many many more factors, since mig-29 is larger it has more electronics, and that's what its all about nowadays.
5. jf-17 and j-10 aren't compatible with American weapons
Thats such a thick head statement! what do you mean!?
WHat? who told you that? Are you really dumb or you are just pretending to be one? looks like your knowlage is limited to your surroundings only.
Only First 50 Batch of JF-17 wont be datalinked to Erieye because they will be basic version with chinese avionics, radar etc, however starting from 2011 next 100 JF-17 batch will incooperate French RC-400 radar, european avionics, and definatly this version will be data linked to both Erieye and ZDK-03 like ACM of PAF said in one of his interviews.
Chinese WS-13 engine is a candidate for next JF-17 batch which btw is a diverdent of AL-31!
very poor information you have! French have offered pakistan M53 currently used on Mirage-2000.
Once they are given MLU they will be more advance then any of your 4th generation MRCA and lol that joke LCA comes no where close to it. well buddy just to let you know, PAF has had more experiance with your Fighters we literally know mirage-2000, mig-29, su-27 inside out! lol
well ya kind of.
lol... you got to be kiddin me?!
Pakistan's Professionals.
"Overall the PAF are a highly professional air force and this is reflected in their high standards of instructions and flying training."
(Steve Bond commenting about PAF's flying training program. Journal: Air Forces Monthly, May 1990.)
Airforces Monthly
Article in the May 1993 issue (pages 46-47 by Sergey Vekhov)
An article in the May 1993 issue (pages 46-47) of Airforces Monthly, a reputable UK-based air defence magazine, written by a Russian aviation writer, Sergey Vekhov, for the first time in public, provided a first-hand account about the PAF's pilots:
"As an air defence analyst, I am fully aware that the Pakistan Air Force ranks today as one of the best air forces in the world and that the PAF Combat Commanders' School (CCS) in Sargodha has been ranked as the best GCI/pilot and fighter tactics and weapons school in the world". As one senior US defence analyst commented to me in 1997, "it leaves Topgun (the US Naval Air Station in Miramar, California) far behind".
Jane's International Defense (June 24, 1998)
The PAF, although outnumbered by IAF, has at least one qualitative edge over its rival: Pilot Training. The caliber of Pakistani instructors is acknowledged by numerous air forces, and US Navy pilots considered them to be highly 'professionals' during exercises flying off the USS Constellation (as co-pilots). The IAF is in an unfortunate position: it lacks an advanced training (and multi-role combat aircraft
6? first of all only 3 by 2012
Phalcon has as much range as Erieye
and India is not gonna pitch all of its AWAC at pakistan as you will have alot of gap holes in other parts of india.
okay no comments on that..
BTW you are really dumb.