Dear chinese and the other friends.

[RayBan]

Thanks India friend, I guess we need buy more to protect our Sea.

our pleasure with lots of love

 

[rcrmj]

Haha, I don't want to war in type with you.

But you made me remember in Vietname War. US had something call B52 and they said this one is untouchable. And how the result.

Yeah we take down US B52 by Russian SAM. And know why we don't take down Chinese Sattelite by US or Russian weapon. I think they will happy if someone can help they test their Weapon for free. Vietnamese in generally can not copy it.

lol```hello simpleton, B52 is subsonic stratigic bomber extreemly clumsy, even the first generation fighter jet can do the job with ease. and stop dreaming about your russian daddy, we have much more progamatic and better things to do, russia and china has strategic relationship in terms of economy development and defence. an insignificant country like vietnam is not worth for russia to deter China-russia relations`

please find your true position in the real world, not those crap by your vietcon propaganda

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Thanks India friend, I guess we need buy more to protect our Sea.

I hope you guys can buy more toys from the big mighty India.

 

[BinhMinh02]

Yes, someone need to tell them why we claim south china sea, we have historic document, relic...history record, the viet is now using internation law to invade chinese terriory, even the law is not make sense.

Nobody read your history

oh, your history has been changed too much

dose Your history ever written about the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa of Vietnam before 1974?

dose Your history ever written about the war killed my people?

 

[dore]

Mệt quá rồi các bạn ơi. Ngủ ngon nhé!

 

[Zhing Jing]

International law?

Vietnam: Free Maverick Legal Activist
Cu Huy Ha Vu’s Sentencing Opens Landmark Struggle

(Bangkok) - The imprisonment of Dr. Cu Huy Ha Vu on anti-government propaganda charges has only raised the fervor of a remarkable outpouring of popular support for his release, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.

Dr. Cu Huy Ha Vu is escorted by police after his trial by the Hanoi People’s Court on April 4, 2011.

Vu, 53, who was sentenced to seven years in prison in April 2011, has extraordinarily broad support among diverse sectors of Vietnamese society. He has become a cause célèbre through the power of the internet, creating an unprecedented human rights challenge to the Vietnamese government, Human Rights Watch said.

The 59-page report, "Vietnam: The Party vs. Legal Activist Cu Huy Ha Vu," describes the unique elements that have made this Vietnam's most high-profile political trial in decades. They include Vu's legal challenges to promote human rights, official accountability, and environmental protection against the country's political elite, including Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung. Vu's family's revolutionary credentials and his own elite background make him one of the most prominent people to have publicly questioned the rule of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV).

"Dr. Vu's conviction is yet another black mark on Vietnam's dismal human rights record and shows that the government will go to whatever lengths necessary to silence a prominent critic," said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. "But in their appetite for retribution, the Vietnamese authorities may have bitten off more than they can chew."

After Vu's arrest in November 2010, his family initiated a tenacious public advocacy campaign for his release that led to an unprecedented expression of popular support for Vu from religious groups, influential bloggers, prominent retired army officials, and ordinary citizens.

Domestic outcry over Vu's trial has saturated Vietnamese-language blogs, webpages, and online publications. Within days after the trial, the popular website Bauxite Vietnam initiated an online petition calling for the nullification of the trial and the immediate release of Vu. In only three weeks, the "Petition to Free Citizen Cu Huy Ha Vu" was signed by nearly 2,000 people, many of them in Vietnam. They include senior communist party members, retired high-ranking army officers, government officials, white-collar professionals, artists, journalists, academics, members of religious congregations, and ordinary workers and farmers. At least a dozen people report that they have been harassed by the police for signing the petition.

The US State Department expressed "deep concern" over the trial's proceedings and its outcome, and added that the case "raises serious questions about Vietnam's commitment to rule of law and reform. No individual should be imprisoned for exercising the right to free speech." The European Union said, "This conviction is not consistent with the fundamental right of all persons to hold opinions and freely and peacefully express them."

Human Rights Watch found clear procedural violations during the trial on April 4, which lasted less than six hours. The Hanoi People's Court refused the defense team's request for access to the documents on which the prosecution's case was based. Judge Nguyen Huu Chinh expelled a defense lawyer from court for continuing to request the documents. The remaining defense lawyers persisted in seeking the documents and when their efforts were in vain, they ultimately walked out in protest.

"While Dr. Vu carried out his activism entirely through legal channels, the authorities suppressed his efforts to advance Vietnam's justice system in a trial that lacked due process safeguards," Robertson said. "Vietnam's leaders should heed calls by the international community to reverse this travesty of justice and free Dr. Vu immediately."

Following his conviction, Vu wrote to Vietnamese authorities, refusing to accept his sentence and filing an appeal. His request is still being considered by the government.

Human Rights Watch recommends the immediate release of Vu because his arrest, detention, indictment, and conviction are based on his peaceful exercise of his right to information, and his right to freedom of opinion, expression, and association. These rights are enshrined in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, as well as in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, an international treaty that Vietnam joined in 1982.

"Vietnam should listen to its citizens who are petitioning for Dr. Vu's release rather than harassing them and treating them like criminals," Robertson said. "The authorities' actions do real damage to Vietnam's already failing reputation as a country that respects rule of law and its international human rights obligations."

越南:立即释放法律维权人士武古辉河
武古辉河被判处徒刑掀开民间社会划时代的奋战

(曼&#35895--- 人权观察组织今天发表报告指出,武古辉河(Cu Huy Ha Vu)博士以"反政府宣传"罪被判处有期徒刑,使已对其迸发支持的公众,更加全情投入。

2011年4月,53岁的武博士被判处有期徒刑7年,他在越南社会各阶层受到非凡的广泛支持。人权观察表示,互联网的力量使他的案件备受关注,对越南政府形成一个前所未有的人权挑战。

这份长达59页的报告,《越南:越南共产党与法律维权人士武古辉河对峙》(Vietnam: The Party vs. Legal Activist Cu Huy Ha Vu),阐述该政治审判成为越南数十年以来最引人注目的独特因素。其中包括武博士在若干领域--增进人权,倡导官员问责制及要求国家环境免受阮晋勇总理等政治精英的损害,面临的种种法律上的挑战。武博士的家属革命时期的资历,本身又来自精英背景,使他成为公开质疑越南共产党执政的最著名人物之一。

人权观察组织亚洲部副主任费尔·罗柏森(Phil Robertson)说:"武博士获刑,为越南已恶劣的人权纪录蒙上新的污点,还表明了越南政府会尽其所能压制知名的批评者。但看来,越南当局报复的欲望可能让他们贪多嚼不烂。"

武博士2010年11月被逮捕后,家属开展并坚韧不拔地进行公共倡导运动,要求将他释放,不料引来各宗教团体、有影响力的博客作家、已退休的知名军官和普通公民前来声援武博士。

越南文的博客、网页和在线出版物充满了越南民众对武博士不公平审判发出的强烈抗议。审判后不到几天,备受欢迎的Bauxite Vietnam网站发起网上请愿书,要求撤销判决,立即释放武博士。在短短的三个星期内,近2000人签署该份"释放越南公民武古辉河"请愿书,其中许多人居住在越南。签署人包括:共产党元老、退休的高级军官、政府官员、白领专业人士、艺术家、记者、学者、宗教团体成员和普通的工人和农民。据报,至少十几人因签署请愿书而遭到警方骚扰。

美国国务院对这次审判明显缺乏正当程序及其结果深表关切,还指出本案"使越南对法治和改革的承诺受到严重质疑。任何人都不应该因行使言论自由的权利受到监禁。"欧洲联盟表示:"这项定罪不符合所有人的基本权利,即,人人享有见解自由及和平表达见解的自由。"

人权观察发现,4月4日举行的审判明确违反法定程序;审判过程不到六个小时。河内人民法院拒绝让辩护律师团查阅控方的案卷材料。其中一位辩护律师因要求阅卷而被法官阮有正(Nguyen Huu Chinh)驱逐出庭,其余的辩护律师虽然继续坚持要阅卷,但还是被拒绝,终于离席以示抗议。

"武博士完全以合法渠道进行维权,当局竟以缺乏正当程序保障的审判,制止他推进越南司法体系",罗柏森说。"越南领导人应响应国际社会的呼吁,扭转这种对正义的歪曲,立即释放武博士。"

被判处徒刑后,武博士向越南当局致函拒绝接受判决并提起上诉,政府还在审议这项要求。

武博士只因和平行使其知情权及其见解、言论和结社自由权,被逮捕、拘留、起诉并加以定罪。这些权利除了铭记在《世界人权宣言》(Universal Declaration of Human Rights),也是越南1982年加入的《公民及政治权利国际公约》(International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights)所纳入的。在此,人权观察呼吁政府立即释放武博士。

罗伯逊说:"越南政府应倾听请愿释放武博士的公民,而不是把他们当作罪犯,进行骚扰。越南未能尊重法治及其国际人权义务,当局的作为进一步严重损害其本已不佳的声誉。"

 

[BinhMinh02]

Tôi cũng mệt lắm rồi ngủ ngon nha, tôi cũng đi ngủ đây, kệ cụ bọn nó

 

[rcrmj]

you guys are genius at making some good looking toys at cheap prices? don't you Chinese???

and you guys are genius at humiliating yourselves by saying this indigenous and that indigenous, but the reality is assembly of directly bought foreign parts, like your Last Chance Aircraft, Arjun and many many more, any by the way, bramos is russian technology, what india did was the money and some primitive software writing``

 

[teddy]

Nobody can read your history

dose Your history ever written about the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa of Vietnam before 1974?

oh, your history has been changed too much

dose Your history ever written about the war killed my people?

The truth is on our side.

 

[BinhMinh02]

International law?

Địt mẹ mày, đi ngủ đi, bố mày mệt rồi

 

[dore]

Tức quá, ai có tài liệu lưu hiểu ba, đàn áp pháp luân công, tây tạng, duy ngô nhĩ ...vân vân và vân vân post lên đi mấy bác, bây giờ bọn nó giở trò này nữa

 

[Zhing Jing]

International law?

 

[vpeople]

Our Beidou satellites are located more than 35000 kilometers above the Earth, then you have to find a missile that is rachable within that range.

The S-300 SAM is very primitive toy for us, the toy that we used to shoot down our own missile is far more advanced even than the S-400 SAM.

Of cause, the advance and number of your Weapon is more hundred times than Vietnam. We can not shoot down your missile but China not easy to find our missile launcher and aircraft.

Nothing you have can prevent our aircraft to fly, laugh missile and hide. If China want block all Vietnam force, she must spend a lot, a lot money but if you not slaughter all Vietnam people, you never get win. SCS is not safe to transport what happen if your country lack of 50% oil .

China can test her weapon on Vietnam. But Vietnam can test Western weapon on China. China can kill a lot of Vietnam People but you never get final win. And who will gain in the war. No China, No Vietnam.

 

[rcrmj]

Nobody read your history

oh, your history has been changed too much

dose Your history ever written about the Hoang Sa and Truong Sa of Vietnam before 1974?

dose Your history ever written about the war killed my people?

delusional people like you dont read, people want to solve problems do read. China started recording its own history since 2000BC, and you are just being hysterical as you are lack of very basic knowledge when it comes to history and such``

 

[vpeople]

didnt you notice the 'governed' part````lol

Governed part is lie, your merchant was Merchant, not Robinson