What's new

China's J-15 Carrier-Based Fighter is Inferior to Russian Su-33 fighter: Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Navkhan tell me which of china's jet fighter at present been tested in war? Russia is shifu of china. Didnt russia recently warned china? And china backed off without any delay? Russian warned china that russia is far superior than china and any move by china will result in china's end. Russia shown china its nuclear stock pile. Google it. (if google works in china than chinese too can google it).

You must be the most popular Indian Comedian in India !
 
Obviously the Russians will say it is inferior. Just like MIG 29 and JF-17s....

Depending on it's package MiG-29 is better and more proven compared to the JF-17. It beats the Thunder's aerodynamic characteristics - through and through.
 
that china plan isn't to copy forever, to be able to create new things one need to be at world levels first
 
and any attack on china by russia means, if not russia's end as a civilization, then its permanent end as a world power.

but both russia and USA can nuke india with no negative consequences, there is no nation in the world that can nuke china with no negative consequences. in fact with our new ABM system or a first strike on india we can take out india with few negative consequences.

The indo-russia(aka soviet union) friendship treaty states that it requires the other nation to help the other in times of war...
In 1971 during india's war with pakistan when china threatened to open a new ffront against india, USA warned of this clause and soviet friends stationed 44 battalions near ur borders which moved BACK ur a$$ to beijing...
The friendship treaty still is valid, as russia declared itself the inheritor of soviet legacy,its treaties and debts...
If russia asks our help we are bound by them to help them either by supplying troops or by a new war front against china in case of a war between russia and china.......
Moreover ur ABM is still aint developed much as much as our own ABM...
So stop day dreaming...
China cant win ,if both russia and india attact simultaneously....
 
The indo-russia(aka soviet union) friendship treaty states that it requires the other nation to help the other in times of war...
In 1971 during india's war with pakistan when china threatened to open a new ffront against india, USA warned of this clause and soviet friends stationed 44 battalions near ur borders which moved BACK ur a$$ to beijing...
The friendship treaty still is valid, as russia declared itself the inheritor of soviet legacy,its treaties and debts...
If russia asks our help we are bound by them to help them either by supplying troops or by a new war front against china in case of a war between russia and china.......
Moreover ur ABM is still aint developed much as much as our own ABM...
So stop day dreaming...
China cant win ,if both russia and india attact simultaneously....

you do realize that even china and the former USSR signed a treaty of friendship. it was technically valid even during the height of of the sino-soviet split. secondly i am having trouble believing that russia will go t o war against china for india(unless it had something serious at stake.. like its own survival) especially seeing as Siberia is mostly empty and there are more than 100 million Chinese just across the boarder, the logistics alone would be a nightmare.

secondly china's ABM is far more advance than india's
 
practically speaking we can't say which one is better until unless china publishes full details of their projects, or they are fully tested in real battle scenarios.. But sad things is neither gonna happen anywhere soon.. So its quite useless to argue about this right now..
They never will. But does it matter? Electronics suites need to be replaced during the MLU to keep them modern. India opted for Indian ECM suite and western electronics on the MKI. On the MIg-29K they opted for some western equipment as well. What ever the reason, it seems as though Russian airframes sell better than the electronics, but then again Russia isn't exactly known to manufacture chipsets or DVD players.
 
Funny that Russia themselves just can't produce Su-33 anymore.

Now they just can't stop badmouthing on China when it can produce something that they can't produce.
 
In 1971 during india's war with pakistan when china threatened to open a new ffront against india, USA warned of this clause and soviet friends stationed 44 battalions near ur borders which moved BACK ur a$$ to beijing...
The friendship treaty still is valid, as russia declared itself the inheritor of soviet legacy,its treaties and debts...
If russia asks our help we are bound by them to help them either by supplying troops or by a new war front against china in case of a war between russia and china.......
I've never heard of this situation where China were threatening or insinuating the opening of a new front against India during the 1971 war. Can you provide some reliable sources? It would be an interesting read, especially considering that it would be impossible to sustain logistically at that time or even today.
 
you do realize that even china and the former USSR signed a treaty of friendship. it was technically valid even during the height of of the sino-soviet split. secondly i am having trouble believing that russia will go t o war against china for india(unless it had something serious at stake.. like its own survival) especially seeing as Siberia is mostly empty and there are more than 100 million Chinese just across the boarder, the logistics alone would be a nightmare.

secondly china's ABM is far more advance than india's

I think chinese armed forces dont have 100 million force levels...
 
I've never heard of this situation where China were threatening or insinuating the opening of a new front against India during the 1971 war. Can you provide some reliable sources? It would be an interesting read, especially considering that it would be impossible to sustain logistically at that time or even today.

This clause is not directly included, but an indirect language of helping india ie it needs to enter war on india's behalf if called for war....
It applies the same to india to help russia....

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
pls jump to western and soviet invlovement in the section to see your reference...
 
This clause is not directly included, but an indirect language of helping india ie it needs to enter war on india's behalf if called for war....
It applies the same to india to help russia....

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
pls jump to western and soviet invlovement in the section to see your reference...
I think you're taking a leap in claiming China threatened India with another front when this was never remotely hinted at. On the other hand, the Americans had a very hostile attitude towards India which had the potential to escalate into full air support for Pakistan. I think absent Soviet support, the US would have provided air superiority and bombing support for Pakistan, along with assassinations of all prominent Pakistani (Bangladeshi) separatists. If that had happened, Bangladesh would have probably never happened.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom