What's new

Battle of ALCMs : BrahMos A vs Pakistan’s Ra’ad

. . . . .
Air launched CM/ SOW in service or about to be phased out - confirmed

KH 29

Kh 31/31P (as Anti AWACS role)

Kh 35

Kh 55

Kh 58 (anti radiation)

Kh 59 (Comparable to US AGM 84 "Slam" )

Harpoon Blk 2

AGM 142 (Popeye)

____

Apart from above, several other variants for TU 142 like Moskit.
 
Last edited:
. .
joint cueing system:lol:

Any HOBS not missile's

Lolz US won't let you integrate Chinese missile do they

No f-16 or Aim-9X for you[/QUOTE]
yes you are on the spot Mr, but we other options like IRS-T or A-darter to put on our F-16
 
.
Any HOBS not missile's

Lolz US won't let you integrate Chinese missile do they

No f-16 or Aim-9X for you
yes you are on the spot Mr, but we other options like IRS-T or A-darter to put on our F-16[/QUOTE]

First acquire it and secondly you need us permission to integrate From US it will take you 2-3, years

I bet jf-17 will may integrate Chinese HOBs in blk -3 before
 
. . .
Ra'ad is the product of Pak. It does what is supposed to do.

Its future variants will do what they would require to do.

Even if its copy of the copy of someone elses mallet... it does not matter to PAF.

It is enough to make sure that Full Spectrum Deterence is extremely credible. IT is growing as planned!

What should/would/will the eastern hegemon have/might have is no concern to Pak planners.

If it makes the eastern hegemon's masses feel that their LCAM the best in the world. Who cares. Good for you. Now kindly move on.

With each and every addition in tactical and strategic assets SPD and all three armed services are making sure that the eastern hegemon would keep boasting in delusions of superemecy. PAK forces will keep doing the job, making any war impossible.

Who is wiser here?

End of this comparison business.
 
. .
But it says french and german experts

French (Dassault) were there as design consultants. That happens everywhere in the developing world- China too used consultancy services of Mikoyan & Antonov for many projects.
 
.
Why quote CM-400 when is not even in PAF Service

"Making its second international appearance was the CASIC CM-400AKG Mach-5 speed ground attack missile. A Pakistani official noted it did not have "passive" guidance, which might enable attacks against mobile targets such as ships, but has inertial navigational system/GPS guidance for attacking fixed targets.

Asked whether the CM-400AKG was in Pakistani service an official responded with a pointed "no comment"."


http://web.archive.org/web/20160604...ghter-flying-with-indigenous-chinese-turbofan
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom