Problem With you Guys are you Use More Rants Rather Post Genuine Technical Content In you Argument
Sir,China's Beidou is GPS It Only Helps in assessment coordinates of fixed targets Land Targets Like city or Base or AREA .Its Only Helpful Inertial guidance.
A CBG Group is Live And Maneuverable Target It constantly Moving For That you Need Chain System of Radars,
[O]ver-the-horizon radars ,Advanced Sonars And ASW And Satellite Surveillance And Full Network Centric Environment And a Complete
supporting command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) technologies to Constantly Predict the virtual Assessment of Target And Prediction of Point of Impact Its Constant Process And very Complex In Itself .
This video help you further Although i don't have English version
Pakistan Not Even Race It Will Take you Decades To Develop Such Network Centric Environment And a Complete supporting command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) technologies And It Very Constaly Affair
Due Really Believe A Pulse Doppler Radar KLj of JF-17 is Able To Perform All Network Centric role And C4ISTAR Command Control
This Debate Started After the Introduction DF-21 dubbed As "Carrier Killer"
This Topic Also Discussed to death by Professional Members Like @gambit in PDF
Here What Many Military Expert Say
As Erickson also noted, from the same text:
“The ASBM’s physical threat to U.S. Navy ships will be determined by the development of associated information processing systems and capabilities. This is part of a larger analytical challenge in which Chinese “hardware” continues to improve dramatically, but the caliber of the “software” supporting and connecting it remains uncertain and untested in war. The missile components of the DF-21D already are proven through multiple tests, but China’s ability to use the missile against a moving target operating in the open ocean remains unproven. The supporting command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) technologies probably still lag behind the requirement to identify and track a U.S. aircraft carrier in real time under wartime conditions. Improving C4ISR capabilities, however, is a high priority in China’s military modernization program. U.S. countermeasures are another matter entirely: there is every reason to believe that they are already formidable.”
“[O]ver-the-horizon radars used to detect ships can be jammed, spoofed, or destroyed; smoke and other obscurants can be deployed when an imagery satellite, which follows a predictable orbit, is passing over a formation of ships; the mid-course updates can be jammed; and when the missile locks on to the target its seeker can be jammed or spoofed.”
The Advance Systems Like SM-3 has an exoatmospheric kill vehicle, meaning that it can only intercept the missile during mid-course, when it’s traveling through space, so an Aegis ship escorting the target would have to fire its SM-3 almost immediately in order to intercept the missile before it reentered the atmosphere, or else there would have to be an Aegis ship positioned right under the flight path of the missile. The DF-21D may be equipped with decoys that are deployed in mid-course, making the SM-3’s job harder. U.S. Aegis ships are also equipped with the SM-2 Block 4 missile, which is capable of intercepting missiles within the atmosphere, but the DF-21D warhead will be performing some high-G maneuvers, which may make it impossible for the SM-2 Block 4 to successfully intercept it.
Barak-8 Is Also Similar System Which Range Envelope of 150 KM
How all this would work in reality is impossible to know in advance. Even after China has tested its missile against an actual ship, it won’t have tested it against one employing the full range of countermeasures that a U.S. ship or Any CBG Group would throw at it and, as you say, the U.S. Navy will never have tested its defenses against such an attack. Somebody is likely to be surprised and disappointed, but there is no way of knowing who.”
Indeed, as Cliff points out,CBG Group do have defenses, albeit against more traditional threats. However, it is important that we keep in mind that American carriers have been a target going back decades, and their defense has been something U.S. naval planners have been working on for many years.
... alot better than a Child's denial La la Land!
, but i will show you a true face of yours are rant, what a double standard you have 
huh! thats butthurts use 
