What's new

27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

Feeling sleepy, so i would make this simple point.
PaF fighters were taken by surprise when four mig 21 entered the melee ,especially two mig-21 that took off from Srinagar airbase, because these two Mig21s (Abhi's) rose from the shadow of Pir Panjal Range unbeknown to PAF on the opposite site of mountain range.

You are right....there were lots of surprises on that morning, and since then.

PAF shot down Abhi-nonedone in an absolute surprise.
IAF shot its own heli - again in a complete surprise.
IAF has stood down since then - to avoid any more surprises.
IAF does not come close to 100-kms on Indian side of Pakistan border since 27th Feb - does not want any more surprises.
 
.
SER.jpg
Bollywood indians vs logical near extinction indians

Pakistani running after indian attack
bYPp0tz.jpg



Vs logical (now near extinction)
f8zMPz4.jpg
 
Last edited:
. . .
Three live bombs fired by Pakistani fighter aircraft are still lying at LoC

https://theprint.in/defence/three-l...ghter-aircraft-are-still-lying-at-loc/215825/

India could claim PAF launched nuclear weapons at India but they all failed to explode and this indiot will believe it.

You are nitpicking between LGBs and H-4 SOW.
The truth is those two Mig21 vectored and flew towards that particular sector as there were F-16s were crossing LoC in their attempt to drop guided munition on Indian installations.

Their is a big difference between H4 which are long range and are only carried by Mirages and JF-17 while LGB are short range.

@waz

Please permanent ban that Banna clown for good.

Once in a while we will have indiot rats escape from Bha-rat raksaw form and pollute this form with their same old nonsense which has been debated a million times with same result in India's embarrassment.

it's good to know that u believe what Indian aircheif and media say. The same article says he shot down a f-16.

Also no where iaf cheif says India jets were jammed in 27th feb conflict. All he said they were buying new radio sets that would provide for secure communication.

The fact that Abhi's wingman returned safely after paying heed to ground control suggest, jamming wasn't effective.

The poster was just trying to prove a point that IAF fighter's communication were jammed and thats why India had to run around after the incident to fix the problem.
IAF cheif was caught pants down when they invited anti-pakistan lady who exposed India's lies.
NO F-16 shot down
And Balakot strike was unsuccessful.

And Lol Indiot Air force officials are using "Twitter" posts for their presentation and did not provide anything from IAF resources.
 
.
it's good to know that u believe what Indian aircheif and media say. The same article says he shot down a f-16.

Also no where iaf cheif says India jets were jammed in 27th feb conflict. All he said they were buying new radio sets that would provide for secure communication.

The fact that Abhi's wingman returned safely after paying heed to ground control suggest, jamming wasn't effective.
Adopting more fake IDs doesn't mean your brain multiplies....there's something called knowledge which you obviously lack.

84596834_2644197332296563_55876661232533504_o.jpg
 
. .
it's good to know that u believe what Indian aircheif and media say. The same article says he shot down a f-16.

Also no where iaf cheif says India jets were jammed in 27th feb conflict. All he said they were buying new radio sets that would provide for secure communication.

The fact that Abhi's wingman returned safely after paying heed to ground control suggest, jamming wasn't effective.
So you agree with my 6 points posted above

Good..some logic still remains in the world
 
.
Three live bombs fired by Pakistani fighter aircraft are still lying at LoC

https://theprint.in/defence/three-l...ghter-aircraft-are-still-lying-at-loc/215825/
nevertheless this article suggests that it was an unsuccessful attempt but contrary to that Pakistan airforce has provided video evidence of last minute control over their weapons and redirecting them in to open spaces. in a nutshell without taking anything away from indian airforce. Pakistan airforce delivered on to the following political objectives successfully.
1. Retaliate in an abstract manner to give a clear message to India that we are not deterred.
2. Show them that we too have matching capability to inflict serious damage if we would want to.

In ground attack and air to air fight PAF had decisively achieved these two objectives.
 
.
nevertheless this article suggests that it was an unsuccessful attempt but contrary to that Pakistan airforce has provided video evidence of last minute control over their weapons and redirecting them in to open spaces. in a nutshell without taking anything away from indian airforce. Pakistan airforce delivered on to the following political objectives successfully.
1. Retaliate in an abstract manner to give a clear message to India that we are not deterred.
2. Show them that we too have matching capability to inflict serious damage if we would want to.

In ground attack and air to air fight PAF had decisively achieved these two objectives.
ignore @Banna bro his source is Indian as usual, and the whole world know what happened at 26/27 Feb
 
.
nevertheless this article suggests that it was an unsuccessful attempt but contrary to that Pakistan airforce has provided video evidence of last minute control over their weapons and redirecting them in to open spaces. in a nutshell without taking anything away from indian airforce. Pakistan airforce delivered on to the following political objectives successfully.
1. Retaliate in an abstract manner to give a clear message to India that we are not deterred.
2. Show them that we too have matching capability to inflict serious damage if we would want to.

In ground attack and air to air fight PAF had decisively achieved these two objectives.

Mind sending me a link to such video? I wasn't aware we had released any such material.
 
.
nevertheless this article suggests that it was an unsuccessful attempt but contrary to that Pakistan airforce has provided video evidence of last minute control over their weapons and redirecting them in to open spaces. in a nutshell without taking anything away from indian airforce. Pakistan airforce delivered on to the following political objectives successfully.
1. Retaliate in an abstract manner to give a clear message to India that we are not deterred.
2. Show them that we too have matching capability to inflict serious damage if we would want to.

In ground attack and air to air fight PAF had decisively achieved these two objectives.

Reading that article you linked it showed so much malice towards Pakistan and it’ would be surprising if anyone took what the Arthur wrote seriously.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom