Did any Hollywood studio have to change the villain from Iran to other country just because they did not want to piss of Iranian ? Was any Oscar caliber actor forced out of job because of his anti-Iran political view? You are good at spinning and twisting, but integrity is the other matter. People are not stupid here. LOL
And how logical of your stand when there are only ever this one time (Which did not end very well for the producer as well, remember) to change the villain from China to North Korea.
To begin with, changing villain is very common (
YES, VERY COMMON) but most were done in Pre-Production stage, not like red dawn in post production, Die Hard, changes the villain twice during their run for 20 years, with the first Die Hard was created in the mind of Russian Mafia, as dictated by the books that come with the series, and the last Die Hard was created for the bad guys to be Serbian, which changed to East Germany and Russia respectively.
People change both protagonist and antagonist for whatever reason. And yes, one of these reason is not to piss off specific people, but the fact remain, Red Dawn changes is aiming to Please the Chinese, I will admit that, and that change basically killed the movie.
Again, you can think whatever you want about this change, studio bend over knee to accommodate to the Chinese is not something really surprising, after all Chinese market is a big market, but to do that, you are gambling with your own money, and in Red Dawn case, it very much lost the plot by doing so, and as a result, I don't think anyone would say this *** kissing act succeed in the end, because he (Vinson) is broke and they manage to take MGM with it, which mean if there are ever going to be one of these gamble again, people are going to think about whether it worth it. And in this very particular case, it
DOES NOT WORTH IT.