What's new

Widespread criticism over rationale for new law to ‘protect’ Islam

Status
Not open for further replies.

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Widespread criticism over rationale for new law to ‘protect’ Islam
The Newspaper's Staff ReporterUpdated 27 Jul 2020
Facebook Count
Twitter Share

14
5f1e5af0025b8.jpg

Rights group condemned those political parties which claimed to fight for the rights of minorities and yet voted for the bill. — APP/File
ISLAMABAD: Various sections of society, including a federal minister, have criticised the passage of the Punjab Tahaffuz-i-Bunyad-i-Islam (protecting the foundation of Islam) Bill 2020 by the Punjab Assembly, warning that such trends would fan extremism.

Federal Minister for Science and Technology Fawad Chaudhry in a tweet stated: “An environment has been created in the Parliament, particularly in the Punjab Assembly, where every [other] member comes up with a motion on a daily basis warning that Islam will be in danger if it is not passed. This is a dangerous trend and it will plunge us deep into sectarianism and religious extremism.”

In response to another tweet criticising the act of passing the bill making publishing of objectionable and/or hate material punishable, Mr Chaudhry stated: “Islam in Pakistan is neither facing any danger from TikTok nor from books. We are facing a danger because of the division on the basis of sectarianism and extremism.

“Those living in palaces must exercise caution and do not fan the fire that burn themselves.”



In a statement, National Party’s Punjab president Ayub Malik said the new law would fan sectarianism besides stoking hatred against minorities in the largest and most populous province of the country that had a history of religious hatred against the marginalised sections of society.

Minister says such trends will plunge nation into extremism

Mr Malik said the country had already suffered a lot due to the retrogressive policies of military dictator General Ziaul Haq that encouraged obscurantist elements of society to badly damage the vision of Jinnah’s Pakistan.

“Now with this new law, the concept of Jinnah’s Pakistan has been pushed towards the verge of complete destruction, paving the way for more hatred against minorities and other sections of society,” he added.

He questioned the rationale of enacting the law when Islamic injunctions of 1973 Constitution along with Section 505(2) of the PPC and Section 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act already penalise racial and sectarian hatred.

Chief of Tehreek Nifaz Fiqh Jafaria Agha Syed Hamid Ali Shah Moosavi in a statement termed the bill contrary to Quran and Sunnah and an attack on the Constitution.

He also announced that peaceful protests would be held across Pakistan on Friday against this law. “We will not shy away from taking any big step to save the foundations of the religion and the motherland,” he said, demanding that “this vicious bill be withdrawn forthwith”.

Agha Moosavi said the passage of the bill just before Muharram was aimed at thwarting the efforts of the government to maintain law and order during the month.

The Women Democratic Front (WDF), a civil society organisation working for women’s rights, also expressed deep concerns over, what it called, “the blatant attempt at increased state censorship through the Tahaffuz-i-Bunyad-i-Islam Bill”.

It said the bill was a transparent ploy to attack the already shrinking space for intellectual independence and religious freedom by threatening to monitor and censor books, magazines, pamphlets and other reading material published and imported into Pakistan in the name of protection of religion.

Through the passage of this bill, it said, the state wished to trample even further on freedom of thought and expression in the country and stifle any dissenting discourse.

The WDF called upon the Punjab governor to not ratify the bill and condemned those political parties which claimed to fight for the rights of minorities and yet voted for the bill.

“It is no secret that religious, intellectual, academic and political freedoms are under attack in Pakistan. Efforts to silence academics, journalists and political workers through force have been increasing while rightwing forces are making it harder for non-Muslim Pakistanis to practice their religion freely,” the statement said. It called upon all progressive forces in the country to join hands in calling upon the legislators to repeal this bill with immediate effect and stand with the forces of freedom rather than against them.

The law passed on July 22 makes “desecration” of any prophet, any of the four divine books, family and companions of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), as well as abetting or glorification of terrorists, and promoting sectarianism in any book punishable with a maximum of five-year jail terms and up to Rs500,000 fine. It makes the use of the words “Khatam-un-Nabiyyeen” mandatory whenever the name of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is mentioned.

Published in Dawn, July 27th, 2020

https://www.dawn.com/news/1571343/widespread-criticism-over-rationale-for-new-law-to-protect-islam
 
Last edited:
. . . . .
Because it has name 'Islam' in it, and any law deemed for Islam is bad in the minds of secular liberals ruling elites of ours.
as a person living in the US, you of all people should understand how bad of an Idea this is.

How would you feel if the US passed a "Christian Protection law"?

furthermore, Was Islam "in danger" before this law?
Last I checked this law has not existed for 1400 years and there are more then a billion Muslim. Not exactly extinct territory.

This is just caveman control syndrome by men who feel powerful by controlling others.
Poverty, disease, hunger, etc... naw man those are not real problems... this is.
 
.
as a person living in the US, you of all people should understand how bad of an Idea this is.

How would you feel if the US passed a "Christian Protection law"?

furthermore, Was Islam "in danger" before this law?
Last I checked this law has not existed for 1400 years and there are more then a billion Muslim. Not exactly extinct territory.

This is just caveman control syndrome by men who feel powerful by controlling others.
Poverty, disease, hunger, etc... naw man those are not real problems... this is.
Which people failed to understand ...!!!!!!!!!!
 
. .
According to this law no one can pronounce Ashaba name without R.A means Shia got big butt hurt along with some others....


Bhai tu rayn dey..ja jakey sasti sharab pi......te so ja

Do you not understand why pissing off 20% of a population, FOR NO REASON, is a bad idea?
It is literally shooting yourself in the foot and then saying "There was nothing I could have done to not shoot myself in the foot"

Tell you what, once we solve Pakistan's: education, health, economy, slavery (yes slavery), child brides, batcha bazi, mafias, etc etc etc problem, we then then come back to this needless law and shoot ourselves in the foot with it.

until then, lets focus on real issue and not made up ones.
 
.
According to this law no one can pronounce Ashaba name without R.A means Shia got big butt hurt along with some others....


Bhai tu rayn dey..ja jakey sasti sharab pi......te so ja
Shia has only objection about no writing Alihas salam for the Holy Prophet progeny in this law. For example, Hazrat Ali a.s or Hazrat Fatima a.s ... means god blessed them. Ahlulbait ....rest they can do whatever they like. Otherwise this is totally uncalled situation from assembly, may be more troubles for Imran Khan , a new front open by PMLq .
 
Last edited:
.
Do you not understand why pissing off 20% of a population, FOR NO REASON, is a bad idea?
It is literally shooting yourself in the foot and then saying "There was nothing I could have done to not shoot myself in the foot"

Tell you what, once we solve Pakistan's: education, health, economy, slavery (yes slavery), child brides, batcha bazi, mafias, etc etc etc problem, we then then come back to this needless law and shoot ourselves in the foot with it.

until then, lets focus on real issue and not made up ones.
These 20% needs to learn how to live with majority just like Sunnis of Iran learned to live in Iran.

Shia has only objection about no writing Alihas salam for the Holy Prophet progeny in this law. For example, Hazrat Ali a.s or Hazrat Fatima a.s ... means god blessed them. Ahlulbait ....rest they can do whatever they like. Otherwise this is totally uncalled situation from assembly, may be more troubles for Imran Khan , a new front open by PMLq .
What about Hazrat Umar R.A, Hazrat Abu Bakar R.A and Hazrat Usman R.A?
 
. .
These 20% needs to learn how to live with majority just like Sunnis of Iran learned to live in Iran.


What about Hazrat Umar R.A, Hazrat Abu Bakar R.A and Hazrat Usman R.A?

As a suni, I fully reject your majoritarianism.
India does this to its minorities and look how much a pariah they are.

There is NO REASON for this.
At the end if you believe in God, then he will judge you for what you did, it is not the Job of humans to judge.

To push this along a little.
If you truly believe in forcing people to follow your version of Islam then why are you not bent out of shape over all the batcha bazi that goes on?

How about Pakistani customs of women giving dowry to men?
Islamic tradition is firmly that the men should be giving the dowry.
Interest? Interest is so incredibly haram yet here we are charging it, giving it, basing our entire society on this.
I can go on for days.

The hypocrisy is endless.

So again, this law is not based on Islam, as I have established many anti Islamic things that happen in Pakistan.
This is about caveman control where people get their jollies out of the feeling of power over others.
 
.
These 20% needs to learn how to live with majority just like Sunnis of Iran learned to live in Iran.


What about Hazrat Umar R.A, Hazrat Abu Bakar R.A and Hazrat Usman R.A?
Not an issue, no need for this bill anyway and don't compare Pakistani shia with Iranian shia please.
 
.
Widespread criticism over rationale for new law to ‘protect’ Islam
The Newspaper's Staff ReporterUpdated 27 Jul 2020
Facebook Count
Twitter Share

14
5f1e5af0025b8.jpg

Rights group condemned those political parties which claimed to fight for the rights of minorities and yet voted for the bill. — APP/File
ISLAMABAD: Various sections of society, including a federal minister, have criticised the passage of the Punjab Tahaffuz-i-Bunyad-i-Islam (protecting the foundation of Islam) Bill 2020 by the Punjab Assembly, warning that such trends would fan extremism.

Federal Minister for Science and Technology Fawad Chaudhry in a tweet stated: “An environment has been created in the Parliament, particularly in the Punjab Assembly, where every [other] member comes up with a motion on a daily basis warning that Islam will be in danger if it is not passed. This is a dangerous trend and it will plunge us deep into sectarianism and religious extremism.”

In response to another tweet criticising the act of passing the bill making publishing of objectionable and/or hate material punishable, Mr Chaudhry stated: “Islam in Pakistan is neither facing any danger from TikTok nor from books. We are facing a danger because of the division on the basis of sectarianism and extremism.

“Those living in palaces must exercise caution and do not fan the fire that burn themselves.”



In a statement, National Party’s Punjab president Ayub Malik said the new law would fan sectarianism besides stoking hatred against minorities in the largest and most populous province of the country that had a history of religious hatred against the marginalised sections of society.

Minister says such trends will plunge nation into extremism

Mr Malik said the country had already suffered a lot due to the retrogressive policies of military dictator General Ziaul Haq that encouraged obscurantist elements of society to badly damage the vision of Jinnah’s Pakistan.

“Now with this new law, the concept of Jinnah’s Pakistan has been pushed towards the verge of complete destruction, paving the way for more hatred against minorities and other sections of society,” he added.

He questioned the rationale of enacting the law when Islamic injunctions of 1973 Constitution along with Section 505(2) of the PPC and Section 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act already penalise racial and sectarian hatred.

Chief of Tehreek Nifaz Fiqh Jafaria Agha Syed Hamid Ali Shah Moosavi in a statement termed the bill contrary to Quran and Sunnah and an attack on the Constitution.

He also announced that peaceful protests would be held across Pakistan on Friday against this law. “We will not shy away from taking any big step to save the foundations of the religion and the motherland,” he said, demanding that “this vicious bill be withdrawn forthwith”.

Agha Moosavi said the passage of the bill just before Muharram was aimed at thwarting the efforts of the government to maintain law and order during the month.

The Women Democratic Front (WDF), a civil society organisation working for women’s rights, also expressed deep concerns over, what it called, “the blatant attempt at increased state censorship through the Tahaffuz-i-Bunyad-i-Islam Bill”.

It said the bill was a transparent ploy to attack the already shrinking space for intellectual independence and religious freedom by threatening to monitor and censor books, magazines, pamphlets and other reading material published and imported into Pakistan in the name of protection of religion.

Through the passage of this bill, it said, the state wished to trample even further on freedom of thought and expression in the country and stifle any dissenting discourse.

The WDF called upon the Punjab governor to not ratify the bill and condemned those political parties which claimed to fight for the rights of minorities and yet voted for the bill.

“It is no secret that religious, intellectual, academic and political freedoms are under attack in Pakistan. Efforts to silence academics, journalists and political workers through force have been increasing while rightwing forces are making it harder for non-Muslim Pakistanis to practice their religion freely,” the statement said. It called upon all progressive forces in the country to join hands in calling upon the legislators to repeal this bill with immediate effect and stand with the forces of freedom rather than against them.

The law passed on July 22 makes “desecration” of any prophet, any of the four divine books, family and companions of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), as well as abetting or glorification of terrorists, and promoting sectarianism in any book punishable with a maximum of five-year jail terms and up to Rs500,000 fine. It makes the use of the words “Khatam-un-Nabiyyeen” mandatory whenever the name of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is mentioned.

Published in Dawn, July 27th, 2020
Such hypocrisy. Muslim countries can pass bills to protect Islam but these same muslims will have problems when Europe, India, Sri lanka, etc will pass laws to protect Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom