What's new

Why So Many Pakistanis Hate Their Nobel Peace Prize Winner

.
Why do you think Pakistan already "looks bad enough to the world"? Is it because what is happening there is truly bad? Denial only makes it worse.
:hitwall:
Now when did I deny what's happening there?
I said it looks bad, not that "it's all good and full of angels but evil hindoos make it look bad"

267f840b177a971a72c7aac9dbb74855.jpg
 
. . .
It looks bad because it IS bad.
To the world, It looks worse than it actually is, thanks to media (and media being backed by people like Malala). I have lived in Pakistan for most of my life and really recently too so I know what I'm talking about. All the media says is bad news, bad news, bad news. As if nothing good ever happens in Pakistan. Lots of good happens, it's just that those stories aren't as sensational as bad ones.

Of course, you will now say I'm lying and in denial and Pakistan is actually full of Taliban who burn women and kill children.
Yes, Pakistan has problems. Yes, it's Pakistanis' fault. No, we are not happy about that. Yes, we are trying to improve our country's conditions.
 
.
To the world, It looks worse than it actually is, thanks to media (and media being backed by people like Malala). I have lived in Pakistan for most of my life and really recently too so I know what I'm talking about. All the media says is bad news, bad news, bad news. As if nothing good ever happens in Pakistan. Lots of good happens, it's just that those stories aren't as sensational as bad ones.

Of course, you will now say I'm lying and in denial and Pakistan is actually full of Taliban who burn women and kill children.
Yes, Pakistan has problems. Yes, it's Pakistanis' fault. No, we are not happy about that. Yes, we are trying to improve our country's conditions.

There is no doubt that good happens in Pakistan along with the bad, and that there is a continuous struggle to improve the country's conditions. But there can be no doubt also in that conditions, despite all these efforts, are deteriorating steadily and surely, by all objective measures, not just subjective ones.
 
.
There is no doubt that good happens in Pakistan along with the bad, and that there is a continuous struggle to improve the country's conditions. But there can be no doubt also in that conditions, despite all these efforts, are deteriorating steadily and surely, by all objective measures, not just subjective ones.
Which is precisely why people are protesting for better leaders and better Democracy. More needs to be done, yes, I agree.

The sun shines after the storm. Be a bit optimistic.
 
.
A typical syndrome of conspiracy running around in Malala case ..... She had real bullets in her head which almost took her life .... She might be seen with Rushdie n all cant negate her vigor for right of education for girls .....
Last don't bring her personal choices to ridicule her achievement at this age....
Some who not happy with her recognition are ISIS supporter here in forum.....
 
Last edited:
.
Which is precisely why people are protesting for better leaders and better Democracy. More needs to be done, yes, I agree.

The sun shines after the storm. Be a bit optimistic.

It is hard to be optimistic when the "storm" has raged on for two thirds of a century and shows no signs of abating. Indeed, it is outright delusion and denial to see anything otherwise, given the evidence.
 
.
We consider Abdul Satar Edhi to be a more deserving candidate for this prize but that doesn't mean we hate her.
 
.
I personally have no problem with Malala or her ideals about women's education. My problem is with 2 things:
-The way the media portrays her
-Her book

The media portrays her as a normal girl who was brave enough to stand up to the Taliban and got shot as a result. The truth is that it was all because of her father, who was politically strong in Swat. A normal girl wouldn't have gotten an airlift to CMH. Neither would a normal girl have gotten transferred to state-of the art hospitals in the UK. I'm glad they saved her life, my problem is that the media story is so full of inconsistencies and it is also a slap for all the normal Pakistani girls who would never get that much attention no matter how hard they tried or how many times they got shot.
Sure, its inspirational and all, but I'd prefer it if the media just told us the truth.

Next is her book, which is a lot more about Malala's (or the co-author's/Her father's) misplaced political beliefs than about education or anything. For example, there are 149 instances of "Army" and a lot of "ISI" in the book. And all of those instances are something like this:



And then there's stuff like this:

Well Malala, what did your father want, Pakistan to join Afghanistan? India? Independence?

Now why did this book need to have this stuff in it? If I wanted to read a book about Pakistani geopolitics I would have read one that is not based on the opinions of a 16 year old girl. A very negative portrayal of the Pakistan army, which is similar to what an Indian would write. Now you know why people call her a CIA agent. (No, I don't agree with them. I just think her book could have been a lot better without all this in it)

As for the Nobel Peace Prize, I don't care anything about it especially since Obama, of all people, got one the last time.


Its because she probably didn't write this book. She should stick to her field of campaigning for children's education. I have respect for what she stands for, remember she is just a child, she will be used again and again to malign Pakistan. Her picture with old pervert Salman Rushdie speaks thousand words.
 
.
Dahell man, you are married? i thought you were a teenager?


he is those village type people who prefer sons to daughters
you are utter wrong
first i am marred and happy with wife

second i hate sons i love daughters

@Imran Khan sir is 63 years old :mad:
tujhy kon bola apny top secret public main show kerny ka ?:hitwall:

WHUT WHUT WHUT?
he told me he was a teenager
are you sure about this?
iski batoon main na ana beta ye bakwaas kerta hai aysy 30 ho ge age bus ziada se ziada :frown::angel:
 
.
No one is jealous of her. No one hates her.

I m one of those against how she is being used as a vehicle of western propaganda against Islam. If you fit a profile where you can be controversial at home by aligning yourself with western agenda, even unknowingly, you will be hated at home.

List of Nobel peace prize winners is always controversial. How many of you who are using Malala to bash Pakistan would agree to Obama getting a Nobel Peace prize?
 
.
It is hard to be optimistic when the "storm" has raged on for two thirds of a century and shows no signs of abating. Indeed, it is outright delusion and denial to see anything otherwise, given the evidence.
If everyone thought like you, we'd all be living in caves. Thank God very few people think like you.
How do you expect Pakistanis to develop their country if you keep telling them their hopes and dreams are all delusions?
 
.
Its because she probably didn't write this book. She should stick to her field of campaigning for children's education. I have respect for what she stands for, remember she is just a child, she will be used again and again to malign Pakistan. Her picture with old pervert Salman Rushdie speaks thousand words.

Female education wont be achieved by living in West. It can only be achieved by returning to Pakistan. Education brought in Pakistan with foreign fund will also come with foreign agenda.

Read Malala book to know who is behind her and who is backing her.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom