Why the stragetic planning shift in the next 5 years is needed and to make it into purely offensive doctrine against India. The price will be heavy from an Indian miscalculation and a complete seizing of India. I don't mean war in 2025 as per say but the planning from there on and the future has to be purely offensive.. The preparation should be purely offensively geared
1. Numbers are deceptive in India's case and in reality it is just a land of peasants and veggies..
2. Pakistan should break the back of the northern Indian territories and the remaining after that will come without much hassle... They don't have stomach for it... They ain't about this life.. It is fragmented country with over 700m living below poverty line.. Their weakness appears to me like an injured gazelle.. They fool nobody..
3. The approach must be purely offensive and the slogan and mindset has to be completely changed to #AllofIndia hashtag allofIndia..
We coming in hard inside India... All or the highway
Enlightened Member,
One pertinent question. If India is a complete walkover and a wimp, what are your
generals waiting for. Why have you not advised the Pak Corps Commanders and the top army brass to immediately invade India and realise Ghazwa - Hind(please correct the term if it is wrongly written).
Do you question the wisdom of your army generals who have been sleeping for decades without realising that India is a piece of cake. Take Kashmir and the whole of India if possible.
Coming to another point. Stereotyping Indians(especially Hindus) as Vegetarians and as a result weak and unable to fight superior meat eating Pakistanis (Muslims).
Do you even know that a very large percentage of Hindus are non vegetarians and meat eaters like the Marathas, many of Tamilian castes etc. The list is quite long and you can Google it.
And how much of a correlation can be made between being non vegetarian and being more battle worthy. Let us discuss further. The non vegetarian diet of most Pakistanis probably consists of mutton, beaf, chicken etc. Now the Chinese have a much more varied non vegetarian diet. Large numbers of Chinese eat snakes, cats, dogs, tiger parts(very expensive no doubt) and other wild animals meat. If you go to meat markets in Shanghai and other Chinese cities, you may find a large variety of non vegetarian food.
So by your logic since the Chinese eat more varied meat all Chinese men should as a rule be stronger and make better soldiers than Pakistanis. So somebody can say that Pak men are inferior to Chinese men.
Many African countries have a very varied meat diet and exceed the normal diet of most Pakistanis. So by logic if they eat more and better meat they also should be superior to Pakistanis.
Now stretching the logic further, there have been reports of the existence of cannibalism in certain tribes and societies in the past. A few tribes in Africa and Central America practised cannibalism. You can Google it for proof. I think you would agree that the most non vegetarian diet would be if a human being ate another human being as food. So by your logic these cannibals should be the best warriors on the planet and should have defeated all others and ruled over the earth.
But to the contrary such societies did not thrive and died out.
Is there anything we can learn from these examples.
To be fair, a meat diet provides more protein and increases muscle strength. But to say that it determines 100% the outcome of any battle is myopic and ill advised.
A 10 year vegetarian Hindu boy with an LMG having a box magazine of 150 rounds of 5.56 or 7.62 ammunition can probably kill a hundred Mohammed of Ghoris coming on horse back armed with swords, spears and shields.
The reality is the nature of war has changed with time. Today's warfare is as much about using your brawn as it about using your brain. If one F16 pilot eats 2kgs of meat and another eats 5kgs of meat. Will the pilot who ate more meat perform better than the pilot who ate less meat. In the cockpit of an F16 do you need to be a pehelwan to read the various instruments and fire an Sidewinder or Amraam missile.
A sniper needs to calculate wind velocity and the probable angle of deviation of the bullet. At very long ranges even a bullet tends to take a parabolic path.
You need to use your brain to make use of today's weapons which are usually of high technology. We can say with honesty that today's soldiers need to be physically fit along with being technologically savvy.
So please don't overrate the importance of a high meat diet.
Calling Hindus vegetarians and cowards is an opium you are addicted to. You cannot digest the fact that the same overwhelmingly Hindu Army has defeated your so called superior meat eating army many times over. You can ignore reality at your peril.
I don't like to stress on religious factors. But the truth is an meat eating Muslim Pakistan soldier will not get immunity from being an non vegetarian. An 7.62 bullet will still pierce his heart if he does not have an bullet proof jacket. It does not matter if an 100% vegetarian Hindu fires that bullet from an assault rifle.
Please don't forget the brutally efficient LTTE group of Sri Lanka. They could probably put even the most battle hardened Talibani to the sword easily. Remember they are Hindus. It is a different matter that we had differences with them. But they were damn good fighters.
