Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
If calling street dog as our national animal made our life better, eased our problems then I have no problem with it.So lets street dogs as national animals they are larger in number than tigers and also crows as national bird.
Similarly, Tamil is a language spoken by a few people in India, it cannot become a language equal in importance to Hindi which is spoken by nearly 600 million people.
I explained already. Using Hindi gives us far more advantages than using Tamil.Its not about quantity but authenticity and originality , some one had used the analogy of dog vs tiger, let me reiterate, using your logic a crow which is the most common animal the dog should be India's national animal.
So yes, if making the common dog the national animal of India made the lives of Indians better, made it easier, increased trade, then by all means make the dog as the national animal.
As a matter of fact, I request you to substantiate your claim.please provide support to substantiate your claim ?
Sri Lanka is your south Asian neigbhour and are you dismissing Tamil's political, economical role in the region ?
You said Tamil was a more international language compared to Hindi.
Whereas Tamil is not even half as important as Hindi as an international language.
Pakistan to Nepal to Bangladesh to Afghanistan - all can understand Hindi.
The majority of Indian diaspora all across the world understands Hindi.
So please, do provide some proof of your claim.