Why can't China have national integration like India?

[TejasMk3]

Prior to the British unification of India. India represent a geographical location composed of various small kingdoms.

Patel organised relief for refugees in Punjab and Delhi, and led efforts to restore peace across the nation. Patel took charge of the task to forge a united India from the British colonial provinces allocated to India and more than five hundred self-governing princely states, released from British suzerainty by the Indian Independence Act 1947. Using frank diplomacy, backed with the option and use of military force, Patel's leadership persuaded almost every princely state. Often known as the "Iron Man of India" or "Bismarck of India", he is also remembered as the "Patron Saint" of India's civil servants for establishing modern all-India services.

Vallabhbhai Patel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

British Raj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Princely State, also called a Native State or an Indian State, was a nominally sovereign entity with an indigenous Indian ruler, subject to a subsidiary alliance.[22] There were 565 princely states when India and Pakistan became independent from Britain in August 1947. The princely states did not form a part of British India (i.e. the presidencies and provinces), as they were not directly under British rule.

"British unification"

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

BS Thread. Without the British India won't even be united. Just think about it. India have hundreds of languages and ethnicity. That two alone is why India will never have a natural union.

 

[INDIC]

Vallabhbhai Patel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

British Raj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"British unification"

Democracy won't work for China, they need someone with Iron fist like communism to keep their country united and keep moving, with democracy situation was like this in China.
List of warlords and military cliques in the Warlord Era - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Arya Desa]

BS Thread. Without the British India won't even be united. Just think about it. India have hundreds of languages and ethnicity. That two alone is why India will never have a natural union.

Diversity is a foreign concept to you hans but it has not been an issue with us.

 

[Shishike]

The China in your mind is only in your mind and on the western new paper.
You may doubt what I am saying, come to China once not on paper, but on your own foot.

and for your question, because China is here for over four thousand years, but India not the old one anymore.

 

[INDIC]

BS Thread. Without the British India won't even be united. Just think about it. India have hundreds of languages and ethnicity. That two alone is why India will never have a natural union.

My Tionghua friend, multilingualism may be issue for Chinese, not for Indians.

Southern Chinese oppose ban on Cantonese TV

 

[Shishike]

Democracy won't work for China, they need someone with Iron fist like communism to keep their country united and keep moving, with democracy situation was like this in China.

and the show is on in India right now, isn't it? Maoist power is working on your land, you may take their opinion first, then we talk about democracy.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Diversity is a foreign concept to you hans but it has not been an issue with us.

I'm Indonesian. We ooze diversity just as you (prob more). Okay, what are the odds that a Punjabi decided to ask a Tamil to form a country?

Let me make it easier for you its going to be the same if a German decided to ask an Italian to form a Country.

Without the British you guys will be split like Europe.

 

[Luca1]

"British unification"

Well, India become a "nation" when the British united the Indian subcontinent. The princely states were subjected to indirect British rule. So the whole India was under British rule except for a Portuguese and a French enclave. This is a widely known fact. So its fair to say that Britain united and created the modern Indian nation.

India did existed as a geographical expression prior to the British control. Examples of geographical expression are Arabia, Balkans, Persia, Anatolia and India. If its not for the British, India subcontinent would be composed of various states prior to British colonization.

I'm Indonesian. We ooze diversity just as you (prob more). Okay, what are the odds that a Punjabi decided to ask a Tamil to form a country?

Let me make it easier for you its going to be the same if a German decided to ask an Italian to form a Country.

Without the British you guys will be split like Europe.

You are totally correct. And history has backed up your statement. However, the prideful Indians in here refuse to accept history.

 

[Arya Desa]

I'm Indonesian. We ooze diversity just as you (prob more). Okay, what are the odds that a Punjabi decided to ask a Tamil to form a country?

Let me make it easier for you its going to be the same if a German decided to ask an Italian to form a Country.

Without the British you guys will be split like Europe.

The difference between us Punjabis and the madrassi is less than that between the Germans and Italians who have had an independent history from one another. They have submitted to North Indian vedic culture and therefore are easily assimilated into India as seen in history.

 

[TejasMk3]

Democracy won't work for China, they need someone with Iron fist like communism to keep their country united and keep moving, with democracy situation was like this in China.
List of warlords and military cliques in the Warlord Era - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The best part is, the very first united empire of China was created by mongols

 

[Shishike]

The best part is, the very first united empire of China was created by mongols

you failed on your Chinese history again.

 

[Luca1]

The difference between us Punjabis and the madrassi is less than that between the Germans and Italians who have had an independent history from one another. They have submitted to North Indian vedic culture and therefore are easily assimilated into India as seen in history.

By study the language of India, Hindi is actually closer to English as its an Indo European language. Southern Indian language are part of a separate language family. This is the legacy of Aryan invasion that brought the caste system into India. So you are correct about "Southern" Indian submit to the Northern Indian invader's Vedic culture. So this part of Indian history is represented by the Aryans dominating and subjugating the conquered Australoid southern Indians with the caste system.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

The difference between us Punjabis and the madrassi is less than that between the Germans and Italians who have had an independent history from one another. They have submitted to North Indian vedic culture and therefore are easily assimilated into India as seen in history.

The Holy Roman Empire begs to differ.

 

[Luca1]

You joking?



Prior to British conquest Mughal and Maratha Empires existed.

Mughal were invaders from central Asia. Another chapter of Indian invasion started with Aryan invasion. And Maratha was just an empire within Indian subcontinent. Did Charlemagne's empire represented the whole Europe? Of course not. Neither would the regional empires within the Indian subcontinent.