Why can't China have national integration like India?

[Yogijaat]

Only basic stuff. (No one ever pick Indian history as their 1st choice. On the account they never bother written most of their history.) My spec remain in European history especially the 18th century.

so stop shytting on this thread, this isn't your toilet.

 

[INDIC]

Do u know anything about history of india??

He once adviced us to read about Max Mueller's starting a chicken vs egg story, you can understand how much he know about Indian history.

 

[Snomannen]

We are an independent nation. BTW can you tell me by using your skyrocketing high IQ how land conquered by foreign 'barbarians' Mongols and Manchus become historical Chinese land.

Because unlike British India, 'barbarians' Mongols and Manchus both consider themselves as Chinese 中國人 and their Empires the "Middle Land" 中國. It is not a fact that can be changed by some Han chauvinist.

Besides Sun himself found the mistake they had made earlier. He then abandoned Han chauvinism and back to the concept of "the Republic of the Five Ethnics (Han, Manchu, Mongols, Hui, Tibetan).

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

so stop shytting on this thread, this isn't your toilet.

Then will "India" ever come into existence without the British?

 

[INDIC]

Then will "India" ever come into existence without the British?

I believe you shouldn't comment on India related topics since you conceded you know nothing about India's history.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

I believe you shouldn't comment on India related topics since you conceded you know nothing about India's history.

I know some basic stuff, but even I know that is the FACT. Compared that to your revisionist theory that India just "magically united itself hands in arms singing koombayah to Indian unity without foreign help."

China on the other hand have one language, one culture, one government to unify them. India is just isn't possible to have a "natural union" with all their differences. That's just common sense.

 

[INDIC]

I know some basic stuff, but even I know that is the FACT. Compared that to your revisionist theory that India just "magically united itself hands in arms singing koombayah to Indian unity without foreign help."

telling us fact without knowing any of it like you told me read about a controversial historian Max Mueller after a simple google search.

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

telling us fact without knowing any of it like you told me read about a controversial historian Max Mueller after a simple google search.

Max Mueller is not a controversial historian. In India probably with all the bias toward him. The rest of the world sees his works as an introduction to learn about India's culture & history.

Go to a library I bet you never been to one.

 

[Kloitra]

30% reservations in jobs and education for starters

30% reservation to 15% population. Than what, 30% to Sikhs, and remaining to Jains and Buddhists?

 

[Reashot Xigwin]

Ahem...

The often perceived and frequently quoted racial division in India between the fairer Aryan
North and the darker Dravidian South is pernicious and dangerous. The British gave currency to
this view of racial divide in India. It was part of their “divide and rule” strategy.

An Aryan invasion of India from the outside around 1,500 B. C. did not occur. People of North
and South India have lived together in peace as two branches of one family since antiquity.
People who talk of an Aryan conquest of India parrot the 19th century British viewpoint and do
disservice to the cause of unity of India

http://uwf.edu/lgoel/documents/amythofaryaninvasionsofindia.pdf

This seems to be a clear bias to me.

This is why an Inferior (you) should bow to their superior (namely me)

 

[Yogijaat]

Ahem...




This seems to be a clear bias to me.

This is why an Inferior (you) should bow to their superior (namely me)

please dude take your shyte somewhere else we are not interested in it.

 

[OrionHunter]

in india, hindi is the national language for a northern caucasian, a southern dravidian or a northeastern mongolian, they all have to learn hindi to get government jobs and interact with each other
in china, why chinese can't be the official language for a han, a uyghur and a so called tibetan?

There's no such thing as 'Chinese language'! It's Mandarin which is spoken by possibly more people than any other language: over 1.3 billion. It is the main language of government, the media and education in China and Taiwan.

 

[INDIC]

Ahem...




This seems to be a clear bias to me.

This is why an Inferior (you) should bow to their superior (namely me)

Seems you still dwell in Hitler's time.

There's no such thing as 'Chinese language'! It's Mandarin which is spoken by possibly more people than any other language: over 1.3 billion. It is the main language of government, the media and education in China and Taiwan.

30% Chinese or 400 million Chinese can't speak Mandarin, its the Chinese pictograph that's unite China, not the Mandarin language.

 

[BigDaddyWatch]

There is no such thing as national integration in India. India is also in part held together with force. Just think about the insurgencies in Assam, amongst the Bodo people and of course Kashmir. That is just a few example of the Indian state needs to use violence in order to keep the country together. The Indian state need to use force to suppress these people's and there nationalist aspirations. Indian national integration is just another fantasy from the Indians just like their supposed superior economic model to China or their ability to innovate.