What's new

when Indian and Pakistani citizens are asked 'what are your opinions of your neighbouring country'

Christian ruled India including you lot. Same logic dude same logic.

Just because you cowards converted, now start claiming yourself as rulers just because some Mongol/Afghani or Turk ruled India. :lol:

The difference between us and your Brahmin overlords is that they consider you shudras, while we consider them as shudras.
 
.
Sorry dear, your rest of the post doesn't matches your first line.

I do not understand how can you belittle Indians by telling how muslims dominated the region. It is as equal as Kerala Christian boast of british rule.

The good thing is Indians hate you for a reason which can be removed very easily. Rest they dont differ you from themselves, its very easy to be allies helping each other. Just think of tourism industry itself, every Indian would love to visit Pakistan some day.

These points are only to be brought up if one of you guys starts slandering us, otherwise, we should remain amicable. There are far fewer Hindustanis than Pakistanis following this rule, especially on the Internet.

No it's not. The Muslim Empires gave us our language, clothing, food, religion, etc. These empires also settled down and intermarried with the locals (Shah Jahan, Ghazi Malik, Sikander Lodi, etc, all these guys had mixed ancestry), and as a result many Muslims across the region are descended from them and the people that migrated to the region with them (Syeds, Qureshis, Ansaris, Barlas, even other common folk may have some ancestry from these guys).
 
.
Christian ruled India including you lot. Same logic dude same logic.

Just because you cowards converted, now start claiming yourself as rulers just because some Mongol/Afghani or Turk ruled India. :lol:
The British were an army that claimed the region from their predecessors, the Sikhs and prior to the Sikhs the Moguls. India cannot deny its Muslim heritage which ruled for hundreds of years nor the land of Pakistan can deny Sikhs and Hindus once ruled. Rather Pakistanis especially from Punjab acknowledge the era under Ranjit Singh, the Sikh Empire.
 
.
All these mongol/afgani or turk are convertees too and why were indians or so called brave indians not able resist them ???

True, Indians were not brave enough. Reason - being living in resource full land, they need to get into war mode very often unlike those battle hardened warriors who require to kill to survive coming from tougher lands.
 
.
Right but the British didn't give Hindustani Christians their language, culture, food, etc and there are only a couple of Hindustani Christians descended from them.
There were well established Christian, Jewish and Muslim communities in the South long before the whole fiasco happened in the North. I don't know much about the origins of Muslim communities in Kerala, but the Jewish communities were well established before Christianity came along. Most of the current Catholic communities in Kerala were followers of the old Syrian church and followed its rites in Aramaic before the Portuguese arrived and told them about the Pope. It became more standardized after the Portuguese.
 
.
I never knew religion demands language or culture similarity.

Can you see how lastofthe patriot claiming himself ruler without being descendant of Mugals?

Anyways, dont get serious with my replies to him.....

It doesn't, but for a Hindustani Christian to claim pride over the British, their has to be some cultural similarity since Christianity doesn't quite have as much of a brotherhood between it's members as Islam does.

He could very well be related to some of these Muslim Empires, you can't quite tell unless he had numerous ancestors that came from these Muslim Empires, if he had just one the genes could get diluted pretty quick.
 
.
The difference between us and your Brahmin overlords is that they consider you shudras, while we consider them as shudras.

Brahmin consider you even lesser than shudras. They wont eat at your house, wont use the glass you ever use to drink water.

While muslims are happy to have a meal from brahmin house.

So spare me with your delusions.
 
.
Brahmin consider you even lesser than shudras. They wont eat at your house, wont use the glass you ever use to drink water.

While muslims are happy to have a meal from brahmin house.

So spare me with your delusions.

Why would we ever be happy to eat at a brahmin's house? We don't like to eat ghaas puss.
 
.
If I could be completely honest, there is absolutely nothing Pakistanis like about Indians except for Bollywood. And that's not even all Pakistanis.

Asalamu Alaikum

Sometimes I wish a war would break out just so Pakistan has an excuse to blow up that giant piece of excrement.
 
.
These points are only to be brought up if one of you guys starts slandering us, otherwise, we should remain amicable. There are far fewer Hindustanis than Pakistanis following this rule, especially on the Internet.

No it's not. The Muslim Empires gave us our language, clothing, food, religion, etc. These empires also settled down and intermarried with the locals (Shah Jahan, Ghazi Malik, Sikander Lodi, etc, all these guys had mixed ancestry), and as a result many Muslims across the region are descended from them and the people that migrated to the region with them (Syeds, Qureshis, Ansaris, Barlas, even other common folk may have some ancestry from these guys).
The Indus region was a wash of empires. The Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Syrians, Mongols, Afghans, Turks and Sikhs all came and settled over the centuries. Pakistanis could belong to any of these ancient groups of people that came and settled.
 
.
It doesn't, but for a Hindustani Christian to claim pride over the British, their has to be some cultural similarity since Christianity doesn't quite have as much of a brotherhood between it's members as Islam does.

He could very well be related to some of these Muslim Empires, you can't quite tell unless he had numerous ancestors that came from these Muslim Empires, if he had just one the genes could get diluted pretty quick.

No dear, there is not much of the cultural similarity between a punjabi muslim and the those mongol, Mughals and Turk. There is no cultural similarity needed either. The phrase "Muslim ruled you for 1000 years" doesn't need that, just religion similarity.

Do you know you dont speak their language but a language generated in Lucknow for convenience? You will find more cultural affinity with me, than a Arab.
 
.
While muslims are happy to have a meal from brahmin house.

LOL yeah right.

The Indus region was a wash of empires. The Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Syrians, Mongols, Afghans, Turks and Sikhs all came and settled over the centuries. Pakistanis could belong to any of these ancient groups of people that came and settled.

Pretty much.
 
. . .
LOL yeah right..

We have muslims in India as well. :)

By the way I dont think there is anything in Islam to belittle people based on their caste, so no shame in having a meal at brahmin house, right?

Sometimes I wonder why some people on this platform act like Brahmins themselves. Be good muslims. :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom