I am surprised to know from you that how could be a religious factor part of foreign policy!
When constitution based over religious ideology then how will separate foreign policy from religious fact? Whole government system including international relation keep their link with religious status of country.
Why you are mixing religion with radicalization? Why you blame Arab countries in radicalization when incompetence of Pakistan to control external influence, who forced Pakistan not regulate these aspects according to his need & political planes? Even interesting for me when you saying that religion is destroying our country it means you are rejecting ideology of Pakistan & got into hypnosis of western ideology that you have no concern with fundamental constitutional importance. We have our own priorities and regional responsibilities. Religion is not tool to destroy but it is our inability & incapabilities in securing or controlling institutions, media & political activities from this flow.
Religion is a personal matter, the way it has been used in government policy within Pakistan has been extremely detrimental to our country where we are hanging by the thread against the onslaught of religious extremism.
Our constitution is partly based on a man made religious ideology and it has been one that has negated our country in every aspect of life. So we should revert back to the way Pakistan ought to be and that is limited or interference of religion in state decisions.
I am mixing religion with radicalism because its religious radicalism that we are currently facing in Pakistan. Its not the incompetence of Pakistan Government but the foreign policy itself that allowed the Arabs to spread their ideology with in our borders. Simply put, if we did not have such a policy, we would be able to do what is required, keep external influence limited within our borders. The ideology of Pakistan is not a quasi-religious state and should be modern Muslim state but that it is not. So your point of view is obviously biased as your religious leaning is quite clear from the onset.
Religion itself has no role to play in the political sphere, similarly it should not be ascribed to a state policy because if it did like Iran, a nations stands isolated and alone.
I was not about shuja pasha and there was enough intelligence information available in record to prove Israel involvement so i am not the one who will repeat again and again same story & reports for your Highness what on record or not, i think you are informed enough.
You only gave me a couple of old facts but nothing more for recent times and I am not informed of any Israeli involvement in recent years. I can assume from your statement that there isn't any information that can support your argument.
Sorry i was wrong that you have real idea how religion is involved by our generals to stimulate Afghan Jihad and even what there happened in reality. (Off topic)
It was an idea by both out military establishment and the Americans to use religions to defeat the Soviets, that decision was very wrong.
Quite interesting you know results of this war but unaware which force pushed all this into borders.
Which force was it?
Well, but you want that i must believe over your link, not fair.
I gave you a link from a credible source, you gave me brief text without any source.
I refereed you book giving idea what main targets pointed by Israel and how they went to realize they think. So Up to you.
If you aware of raeli plans to attack Pakistans Nuclear facility then what make you close eye & support this idea despite there is no guaranty of security & non aggressive assurance?
My entire point is that with diplomatic relations, the GoP will be privy to more information being channeled through Israel and thus we would be in a batter position to deal with them/
and we have to believe!? in case of Israel????????
Depends, tit for tat.
bold part is place where you want to reach. Look like world is ended for us and we can get nothing if we will not establish diplomatic relations with Israel!!!!
Red part: we can't say that we got nothing from Arab states, totally injustice. What could be balance where our decision over Israel depends over our main Arab partners?
What did we get from the Arab states?
And why does our decision depend upon our Arab partners, we are an independent nation and we should so what is best for our nation.
Blue part: O come one did you think that my non supporting position bases over emotional & religious. Joke for me.
Seems like it.
Being a true Pakistani i only want a security assurance and harmless attitude of Israel toward my country & past ever play important role in establishing relation so this past of Israel force to think even million times in stepping up toward diplomatic ties, Yes if they will give us guaranty & prove that they have no negative agenda toward Pakistan then WE WILL THINK AND BRING UNDER CONSIDERATION
btw we have relations with other western countries too.
So being a true Pakistani you want to let the Arabs harm our nation but not open relations with other countries who we can first discuss all issues with.
It would be a slow process and that is fine, but we need to reconsider our foreign policy which is flawed to say the least.
