US should declare that Pakistan has no claim on Kashmir:US Expert.

[Bang Galore]

As far as I have heard him, he will use all diplomatic means to end these strikes. His solution to end these drones is as under:

1 - Guarantee the US (and by extension, India) that no terrorist attack will originate from Pakistan's soil.

Fair enough?

How will he provide a guarantee? Does he have influence? Is he suggesting that the Pakistani state can stand guarantee for terrorist behaviour?

 

[Rafael]

Well you have pointed out a crucial and important issue. Its important for them to declare which Kashmir are they talking about. If they include Pakistan admin. Kashmir, then situation will be more different. But if they mean that Pakistan can't claim Indian admin. Kashmir and supports LOC to be made IB, then things will be pretty interesting.

Well, I will be waiting for some concrete and clear official message from US as no one can be certain of US when their Foreign Policy is concerned.

Indeed its not clear as of now.

I just hope that we turn LOC as International border and be content with what we have.

No more wars please!

 

[Bang Galore]

I just hope that we turn LOC as International border and be content with what we have.

No more wars please!

Hear, hear ! Why more people don't get this common sensical message is very hard to understand.

 

[Rafael]

Why can't he?

What sort of leadership is he going to give you guys then?

Where any terrorist plot can be hatched on your soil and perpetrated on another country?

That's a recipe for disaster.

Because the motivation to attack will still be there. While he can have all kind checks and balances, but if the root cause is not addressed, nothing will change.

How will he provide a guarantee? Does he have influence? Is he suggesting that the Pakistani state can stand guarantee for terrorist behaviour?

By improving governance, providing jobs, education and counter brain washing of the militants.

PS. I gotta go. Will address your queries later.

 

[surya kiran]

US anyway can say what it likes. The dispute is bi-lateral and that's how its going to be solved.

The slow process of declaration of P-occup-K as part of Pakistan has started. Once this is done, the plebiscite is out of the window. This is what the Indian establishment and hence the foreign office is waiting for. The issue is practically dead after this. The LoC will become the IB. Then what will remain is purely Siachen.

But, this will cause tremendous internal upheavels, because this is not a tactical withdrawal, but, a strategic change in state policy. How will the internal stakeholders, (the PA may be in sync, but the rest??) respond to a proposal like this? How to control the fallout if they decide to create a problem?

Somehow, I thinkk, the PA is realising there are more priorities in the western front and it needs peace on the eastern front for this. Also, rationalisation that the insurgency has back fired with the internal state of Pakistan, including ordinary people being effected by this.

It is in the best interests that, we hail the declaration of P-occu-Kashmir as a part of Pakistan. Peace, finally in South Asia, will seem achievable.

 

[karan.1970]

Indeed its not clear as of now.

I just hope that we turn LOC as International border and be content with what we have.

No more wars please!

Quoted for Respect...

 

[KRAIT]

Quoted for Respect...

Oye, you are back ? How was your trip ?

 

[vsdoc]

Quoted for Respect...

It is not in India's best interest to have the LOC turned into an IB at this stage.

Because the motivation to attack will still be there. While he can have all kind checks and balances, but if the root cause is not addressed, nothing will change.

26/11 happened because of Kashmir?

 

[WAR-rior]

Indeed its not clear as of now.

I just hope that we turn LOC as International border and be content with what we have.

No more wars please!

But there is a problem. Your this attitude wont be taken as an intent of peace but as an action of weak and dishearted and an action of submission towards India. Some mite also quote it as repeat of 1971. This wud be the case on both sides of the border. Do u really think majority of awaam is ready for this sentiment ?

 

[Rafael]

26/11 happened because of Kashmir?

Pretty much. Hafiz Saeed (if guilty) was a product of Kashmir liberation movement.

But there is a problem. Your this attitude wont be taken as an intent of peace but as an action of weak and dishearted and an action of submission towards India. Some mite also quote it as repeat of 1971. This wud be the case on both sides of the border. Do u really think majority of awaam is ready for this sentiment ?

Pakistan has got no other choice at this stage. It can either fight for Kashmir or survive!

 

[INDIC]

Pretty much. Hafiz Saeed (if guilty) was a product of Kashmir liberation movement.

But he is not a Kashmiri but a Punjabi.

 

[Don Jaguar]

this could be the final nail in the coffin of usa-pak ties.

For Pakistanis the final nail was injected in 1999 i mean in kargil war.

 

[INDIC]

For Pakistanis the final nail was injected in 1999 i mean in kargil war.

I believe its Abottabad raids that was a final nail.

During Kargil it was Musharraf who sent Nawaz Sharif to Washington to plea for ceasefire with India after the fall of Tololing peak, so how is it final nail in US-Pak relations.

 

[SamranAli]

Just Do it...

If they do, what will happen? Kashmir issue solved?

 

[lightoftruth]

For Pakistanis the final nail was injected in 1999 i mean in kargil war.

then those pakistanis never had any say in pak govt.could be the musharraf effect.