What's new

US requests NATO supply route from Iran.

Idiots think US will give something to Pakistan.

Pakistan did more than what it has done now in previous Afghan war. What did we get in the end? sanctions!

Strategic interests are not bread crumbs that Pakistan can gather. Pakistan will have to be in a position to get any of its interests protected. It will have to think to revive its eceonmy. Taking moeny from IMF will not put it in a position of strength.

US may get its supplies from where ever. Fact remains Pakistan can only get what it wants by its own position in the region, not as some hand out.

The position that Pakistan has currently is that it takes money to run its govt, it also wants a pole position in the affairs in Afghanistan. Its government and its sympathizers dont have courage to stand up as they are corrupt people. They have money to hide in foreign capitals.

In the last decade, Pakistan has become worse. Instead of putting it in a position of strength, it has been attacked from both western and eastern border. Despite sacrificing thousands, it has no say and no one wants to listen to it. At the same time, it expects that while its economy and its pride will keep taking hits, it will be given a key position.

Letting NATO supplies through or cooperating with them will never get you anything at all. This is a wrong policy and an approach based on fear. And fear does not take you far, it restricts you. This is dilemma of Pakistan and it has been put in it by those who fear for their assets and family more than the country while wanting to claim its leadership.
 
. .
Y

You do have the letter "K" in the name PA"K"ISTAN as well...has not changed anything ..has it?

lol , i think you dont know but that 'K' i Pakistan stand for Kashmir anyway ... so its pointing to same thing again
 
.
Y

You do have the letter "K" in the name PA"K"ISTAN as well...has not changed anything ..has it?

Well if you do not know , the Islamic Republic of Pakistan has almost 84,000 sq km or 37 percent of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir in its possession , the area whose defense is under actual control of Pakistan . So there's a " K " .

lol , i think you dont know but that 'K' i Pakistan stand for Kashmir anyway ... so its pointing to same thing again

Maybe , its time , people start to learn some history and maybe a little of geography .
 
.
Well if you do not know , the Islamic Republic of Pakistan has almost 84,000 sq km or 37 percent of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir in its possession , the area whose defense is under actual control of Pakistan . So there's a " K " .



Maybe , its time , people start to learn some history and maybe a little of geography .
thank you and No thanks!. I already know my History and Geography....(Kashmir is still part of India..the Indian Part..63%)...we don't want your part. You can keep 37% and lets move on...Would you prefer if we change the name of the 67% that we have to something else so that you can rightfully use the K in Pakistan with no one challenging it?
 
.
thank you and No thanks!. I already know my History and Geography....(Kashmir is still part of India..the Indian Part..63%)...we don't want your part. You can keep 37% and lets move on...Would you prefer if we change the name of the 67% that we have to something else so that you can rightfully use the K in Pakistan with no one challenging it?

No , you do not . Because its not sixty three percent still , you should subtract twenty more percent from it to get an accurate figure - which places 47% of the former princely state under Indian control because the Chinese control the other twenty percent under the " Aksai Chin and assorted territories " . That is another debate of course what is the solution of that dispute , but I had to explain to you that the letter " K " in Pakistan's name wasn't without a reason and it wasn't added later . Isn't that a really childish question since the usage of a letter in my country's name is not dependent on India in anyway ?
 
.
And what about dear TTP at home?

Deprives them of a reason to fight the state of Pakistan , though they can always find any other excuse but it will result in a decrease in their popularity and " justified cause " syndrome .
 
.
No , you do not . Because its not sixty three percent still , you should subtract twenty more percent from it to get an accurate figure - which places 47% of the former princely state under Indian control because the Chinese control the other twenty percent under the " Aksai Chin and assorted territories " . That is another debate of course what is the solution of that dispute , but I had to explain to you that the letter " K " in Pakistan's name wasn't without a reason and it wasn't added later . Isn't that a really childish question since the usage of a letter in my country's name is not dependent on India in anyway ?
@Secur..I always agree when I am wrong, which I am on this topic....Now Having said that I was just trying to make a point to the the post by @Leviza."you will see, we will turn it to TTPK where K stands for Kashmir"..He was trolling and so was I. You are one of the more sane people on PDF and I respect you for that.
 
.
@Secur..I always agree when I am wrong, which I am on this topic....Now Having said that I was just trying to make a point to the the post by @Leviza."you will see, we will turn it to TTPK where K stands for Kashmir"..He was trolling and so was I. You are one of the more sane people on PDF and I respect you for that.

Dude, if you read the whole thread before hitting reply or anything , you will see that TTPK was ment to be a joke ... so on this thread at least i doubt 'sane' word used for you ... you need to prove it again all over mate ..
 
.
Dude, if you read the whole thread before hitting reply or anything , you will see that TTPK was ment to be a joke ... so on this thread at least i doubt 'sane' word used for you ... you need to prove it again all over mate ..
If you really meant it as a joke....I Apologize. And lets move on and discuss the topic on hand.
 
. .
thank you and No thanks!. I already know my History and Geography....(Kashmir is still part of India..the Indian Part..63%)...we don't want your part. You can keep 37% and lets move on...Would you prefer if we change the name of the 67% that we have to something else so that you can rightfully use the K in Pakistan with no one challenging it?


Kashmir is not part of India. Kashmir is for Kashmiris, which has been invaded by India and is u der its illegal occupation. Kashmiris have made it quite clear they do not want foreign Indians in their land. Whole occupied Kashmir by Indian is shut down in protest when ever a high level official India enters Kashmir.
 
.
Kashmir is not part of India. Kashmir is for Kashmiris, which has been invaded by India and is u der its illegal occupation. Kashmiris have made it quite clear they do not want foreign Indians in their land. Whole occupied Kashmir by Indian is shut down in protest when ever a high level official India enters Kashmir.
No problem. It is still ours.

Any cyberkid can't change the fact. Thanks for the concern.
 
.
Kashmir is not part of India. Kashmir is for Kashmiris, which has been invaded by India and is u der its illegal occupation. Kashmiris have made it quite clear they do not want foreign Indians in their land. Whole occupied Kashmir by Indian is shut down in protest when ever a high level official India enters Kashmir.

No it still belongs to India. Now go and cry me a river. The foreigners living in Indian Kashmir are free to leave.
 
.
No it still belongs to India. Now go and cry me a river. The foreigners living in Indian Kashmir are free to leave.

face_desk_by_shadowtorres-d3qy79i.jpg


No problem. It is still ours.

Any cyberkid can't change the fact. Thanks for the concern.
Neither can keyboard crusaders like yourself. So take it easy and enjoy the drama!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom