which of his policies do you have a problem with ?
It's that he doesn't have any that's more concerning to me. I can overlook his conservative traits. I'm as liberal as you'll find in Europe, so that's just a matter of ideology, which is fine to me. We all have different views on money, business, and so on. Though I find the common stance on climate change to be worthy of ridicule.
He flip-flops on his policies even during debates, proposes outlandish and illegal reforms like making the military return to torture - which they refuted and struck down as ineffective - Trump flip-flopped on that too. His "border wall" is a fantasy that's pandering to nationalistic sentiments. He's in favor of increasing taxes on the middle class and lowering them for the upper class, which isn't popular with Americans either.
His incitement of violence and refusal to disavow racists isn't exactly comforting either.
Rather then take responsibility for and onus for reducing, Trump has pinned the violence at his rallies on others.
Ironically, having Ben Carson endorse him probably lost Trump the KKK vote
.
The man has no concrete policies that'd actually work, beyond bigotry. He's just pandering to Nationalism, which never turns out well. His movement has a lot of parallels with the rise of German Nationalism in the 1930s. And no, I don't think that's an extreme comparison.
Here's a better question; what do you like about him and his policies? As popular as it is on this forum, there's nothing to suggest Trump would be good for India either. No matter his pro-business stance, he's also noted that returning US jobs from overseas, including from China and India, is in the US' best interest... though he doesn't have the authority to do that either. He may be hard on Pakistan or China, more likely China, but that doesn't mean he'd be good for India either.
And no, I don't consider any of the other candidates to be any better. Sanders would be good if running in Europe, and just another Labor Party member, but he's yet to demonstrate how his socialist platforms would translate to a nation the size of the US. Clinton's a hawk, Cruz is too evangelical and Rubio is done.
Europe considers Clinton or Sanders the best case scenario. I'd favor Sanders in Europe and Clinton in the US.
...
Once again, Polandball has a great take on Trumpism.
Discipline is great so long as it is fair and you are not at the receiving end.
The best discipline is that imposed on people we don't agree with.
Ironically, a disciplined nation doesn't need their government forcing discipline upon them.
Where does disciplined end and repressed begin?
...
@F-22Raptor @Desertfalcon @Hamartia Antidote Any points to add? Critique? Correct?
Takk.