What's new

US assures China 38th parallel pullback if North Korean war | Guardian

.
The treaty become invalid when one party don't cooperate and break the friendship
If USA do it, there must be some under table agreement
 
Last edited:
.
Then the US should have no objection to the PLA entering North Korea in the event of hostilities. They might forget where the 38th parallel is and need China's help finding it.
 
. . .
South Korea will reject any possible offensive military action against North Korea, SK can't take the risk of being toasted like a fat goose by cannon storm from the caves of their northern brothers. This will completely destroy their economy. US will have to seriously consider the consequence of such move, small European members of NATO will understand they're probably next toasted goose if there's any escalated collision between Russia and NATO, this will definitely trigger the collapse of NATO.

The best bet of US and South Korea is that North Korea will have an internal coup, the fat Kim understands his rival's intention and psychology very well, that's why North Korea employ a strict isolation policy and national spies are at every corner of North Korea.

This is a game of psychological endurance, if US can't hold, South Korea will lose and hence US will lose, if North Korea can't hold, Kim will lose.

All the news and propaganda are for those North Koreans who have a secret channel to access outside information like this, this will gradually accumulate North Korean's internal force for a potential coup.
 
.
South Korea will reject any possible offensive military action against North Korea, SK can't take the risk of being toasted like a fat goose by cannon storm from the caves of their northern brothers. This will completely destroy their economy. US will have to seriously consider the consequence of such move, small European members of NATO will understand they're probably next toasted goose if there's any escalated collision between Russia and NATO, this will definitely trigger the collapse of NATO.

The best bet of US and South Korea is that North Korea will have an internal coup, the fat Kim understands his rival's intention and psychology very well, that's why North Korea employ a strict isolation policy and national spies are at every corner of North Korea.

This is a game of psychological endurance, if US can't hold, South Korea will lose and hence US will lose, if North Korea can't hold, Kim will lose.

All the news and propaganda are for those North Koreans who have a secret channel to access outside information like this, this will gradually accumulate North Korean's internal force for a potential coup.

South Korea has 0 rights of opposing anything, simply speaking.
 
.
South Korea has 0 rights of opposing anything, simply speaking.

It's true that the authority of military is controlled by USA, however this does not indicate US can do whatever they want, USA has to consider its commitment to its allies. Super powers have commitment to its allies like Russia's protection of Syria. This is why allies exist in the first place, there must be common interest to form a relationship of alliance. South Korea can tolerate many trivial thing dominated by USA, however, war directly decides their fate, they apparently won't agree such move by USA especially North Korea is already a de facto nuclear power.
 
.
Okay, agree America attack North Korea, let's see what benefits America can get from North Korea. I guess finally it's China take over the post war mess and control North Korea again. Thanks America in advance, Merry Chiristmas.

May the force be with you!
 
.
You can always tell when China opposes a US invasion of a country.

China has vetoed THREE TIMES the US proposal to attack Syria. (China cast a Permanent Veto on February 4 2012, July 19 2012, and May 22 2014)

No Chinese UN Security Council Veto for Saddam. Saddam gave Iraq's best oil fields to western countries and gave China sub-standard oil fields. No point in expending Chinese political capital to save Saddam.

No Chinese UN Security Council Veto for Gaddafi. Gaddafi gave his best oil fields to an Italian company. Gaddafi also criticized Chinese business transactions in Africa. Good riddance to Gaddafi.

To date, I don't recall any Chinese UN Security Council Veto for North Korea's Kim Jong Un.

Kim Jong Un has ignored China's suggestions of modernizing North Korea.

China would be better-off with a more pro-business North Korean leader.

Why not let the Americans bomb Kim Jong Un? As long as the US Army returns to the 38th parallel, a new North Korea would be stable and a long-term business partner for China.


No. Atomic weapons will not deter a mature thermonuclear power.

Saddam had chemical weapons. He was too afraid to use them on the invading US Army. The US threatened to nuke Saddam's hometown if chemical weapons were used.

The US has already nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Playing hardball with the US will only get all of North Korea nuked.

North Korea can cause damage to South Korea, Japan, and US bases. However, the cost could be extinction. The US has the power to erase North Korea from the map with a single Ohio-class SSBN.

One Ohio-class SSBN carries 24 Trident II SLBMs. Ignoring treaty limitations, the maximum number of MIRV warheads is about 10 per SLBM. That's 240 warheads per Ohio submarine. Each W-88 warhead is 475 kilotons.

Say goodbye to North Korea.

There is one problem Martian, China still has mutual defense treaty with NK that will expired in 2020. If they let US attack NK before that year, nobody will trust China again in the future. But this cooperation is not impossible. As the surgical attack can be happen after the 2020. That's it, unless China and NK renew the treaty.
 
.
Do not trust the Americans, especially the Trump administration. I believe the US will renege on their "promise".
If all oil are cut, the North will launch a nuclear war against the US/Japan/SK!

Trump is a trustworthy guy, unlike Obummer. He always keeps the promises. NK's regime is like a cancer that need to removed through surgical operation!
 
.
There is one problem Martian, China still has mutual defense treaty with NK that will expired in 2020. If they let US attack NK before that year, nobody will trust China again in the future. But this cooperation is not impossible. As the surgical attack can be happen after the 2020. That's it, unless China and NK renew the treaty.

Until this day, There is NO statements from China that they are agree to let US troops cross 38th Parallel to attack North Korea.
And also they never ever make a statement, They will attack North Korea.

And I believe, Chinese will never trust US.
America already have very bad reputation when it comes to an agreements.
They try to tell and convince, that Iraqi have WMD and they need to attack.
But after that, we all know they are a LIAR
 
.
War fanatics should stop illusion. North Korea is not a threat to USA, USA defense system can shoot down NK's missile, whether or not NK's missile can accurately hit target is still a pending problem, NK has no geographical condition to test such capability. However, NK does have the capability to destroy South Korea and Japan, the close distance make it possible.

USA can't get any positive output from attacking North Korea, China already passed the stage that a regional war can stop growth of China. So forget it waging a war can effectively stop China's growth. In fact, the output may be positive for China and negative for South Korea, Japan and USA. South Korea has many overlapped industrial sectors competing with China, e.g. shipbuilding, semiconductor, chemical, machine tools etc, unless USA want to 'donate' China a chance to swallow all the industries South Korea already built in the past few decades, this also have negative impact on Japan's industries due to integration of supply chain, it does have negative impact on China's relevant industries in short term, however China can recover from this crisis very fast. South Korea will lose their market share for ever.

As I mentioned earlier, all the news are broadcast to impose psychological pressure to North Korean who have secret channels to access outside information.
 
Last edited:
.
There is one problem Martian, China still has mutual defense treaty with NK that will expired in 2020. If they let US attack NK before that year, nobody will trust China again in the future. But this cooperation is not impossible. As the surgical attack can be happen after the 2020. That's it, unless China and NK renew the treaty.
I think China should adopt the US policy on mutual-defense treaties.

The US position is that a mutual defense treaty is a shield, not a sword. In other words, a defense treaty is purely defensive.

When a country like North Korea abuses a treaty, it is on its own.

Refusing to talk to China is not a sign of an ally. Implicit in a mutual defense treaty is an obligation to meet and strategize with your benefactor.

Here, we have the tail wagging the dog. North Korea does whatever it likes and expects China to assume the responsibility of an international crisis.

To me, that is a ridiculous interpretation of a mutual defense treaty. Either North Korea listens to China or the defense treaty becomes just a piece of paper. Being treated as a fool (when Kim Jong Un refuses to meet with China's special envoy for an entire four days) is no way to honor a mutual defense treaty.
----------

A piece of paper (mutual defense treaty) does not authorize Kim Jong Un to put tens of thousands of Chinese soldiers' lives at risk.

Kim Jong Un is eager to fight the Americans. His provocations continue non-stop. Let him fight the Americans alone.

If any of you disagree, I would like to see you prove it and volunteer to protect Kim Jong Un's rogue regime. He doesn't listen to China. He refuses to meet with China. That is no ally.
 
.
You can always tell when China opposes a US invasion of a country.

China has vetoed THREE TIMES the US proposal to attack Syria. (China cast a Permanent Veto on February 4 2012, July 19 2012, and May 22 2014)

No Chinese UN Security Council Veto for Saddam. Saddam gave Iraq's best oil fields to western countries and gave China sub-standard oil fields. No point in expending Chinese political capital to save Saddam.

No Chinese UN Security Council Veto for Gaddafi. Gaddafi gave his best oil fields to an Italian company. Gaddafi also criticized Chinese business transactions in Africa. Good riddance to Gaddafi.

To date, I don't recall any Chinese UN Security Council Veto for North Korea's Kim Jong Un.

Kim Jong Un has ignored China's suggestions of modernizing North Korea.

China would be better-off with a more pro-business North Korean leader.

Why not let the Americans bomb Kim Jong Un? As long as the US Army returns to the 38th parallel, a new North Korea would be stable and a long-term business partner for China.


No. Atomic weapons will not deter a mature thermonuclear power.

Saddam had chemical weapons. He was too afraid to use them on the invading US Army. The US threatened to nuke Saddam's hometown if chemical weapons were used.

The US has already nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Playing hardball with the US will only get all of North Korea nuked.

North Korea can cause damage to South Korea, Japan, and US bases. However, the cost could be extinction. The US has the power to erase North Korea from the map with a single Ohio-class SSBN.

One Ohio-class SSBN carries 24 Trident II SLBMs. Ignoring treaty limitations, the maximum number of MIRV warheads is about 10 per SLBM. That's 240 warheads per Ohio submarine. Each W-88 warhead is 475 kilotons.

Say goodbye to North Korea.
Wiping out North Korea totally may cause affects on China. Such a huge bomb will definitely affect the neighbors so definitely, China won't let it happen.

Saddam had nothing. US only accused him of possessing chemical weapons. It was all cooked B.S. Had he developed chemical weapons, he would have used them. He was least afraid of being dead. Just watch his video moments before he was hanged. If he had something powerful, he would have certainly used them. He would have gone down fighting rather them surrendering just like that.

US lies, just like they lied Pakistani government knew Usama was in Pakistan. A few days back, Obama said in India, Pakistani government didn't know about Usama's presence in their country. Either way, one of the statements here is blatant lie.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom