US asks India, Pakistan to restrain their nuclear, missile programmes

[class over]

indian defence against current threat perceptions shldnt be influenced by foreign pressure..

 

[newdelhinsa]

1. We are used to listen to such rants from US. who cares.

You people care that is why you were quick on tagging statement of S. Saran with this American statement. But the point remains why Pakistan was asked to do the same, what you guys have done lately ?

Its your turn. This US statement came in light of your uncalled for nuclear attack threatening statement against Pakistan, that is what matters.

It matters to us zero, because we are true to minimum credible nuclear deterrence and our numbers hasn't gone up. It is good that our threatening has been heard three oceans away. Good Job Mr. S.Saran. Now USA will tell Pakistan not to do any misadventure of using nukes against India cause they know India will only use after been attacked.

2. Your statement was nothing but a frustrated try to divert attention. Even idiots know that if he is attacked with nukes he will retaliate in same. Why you Indians even imagine war that too a nuke war on daily basis.

Either you are naive or do not read comments of your own Pakistani crowd when they boast about tactical nukes, Nassar and strategies against CSD.

People are not fool they know what you guys have been doing and thinking, we even know how much income tax your scientists pay.

we have many threats.

1. India. If you attack us we must have some tactical weapon to act rapidly.

You do not know about Tactical nukes, NATO and Russia are done away with it. The threat Europe had from Russia is nothing what you people exaggerated against India.

And Since you people are sponsoring Jihad in Kashmir you are going to be threatened by us all the time.

2. developing small tactical weapons are also ensuring to fightback any attempt by super power/s to disarm us.

Respected member, this is not how things work.

3. Indeed Pakistan developed nukes to nullify Indian conventional superiority. With your Indian army and weapons expanding rapidly its OUR right to develop ours. Whats the issue there? Should we sit still

You guys should be now back to massive punitive nuclear strike, why get pounded with nukes deterring your population and military centers for tactical nuke with high probability that they will miss moving IBG by miles ?

 

[JayAtl]

I expect ignorance from " some" groups here but to see silly comments from Indians is surprising. This is a vanilla statement, if at all really aimed at pakistan who is going to have a bigger arsenal than EU soon vs. India , but has India named in the mix just to not come off one sided.

It is a vanilla statement sent out as a " global " concern. Try to read the bigger picture vs. silly little chest thumping.

 

[Spring Onion]

India is not worried about some 30 odd brain washed chinese tenting inside Indian territory, we are evaluating our options beyond diplomacy.

evaluating other options indeed a wise step BUT only if the Indian Govt is doing so out of wiseness NOT under pressure from warmongering media here the case is later one and that is something that can be with stupid outcome

Regarding our policy explanation we can also issue warnings to China, why the hell do you think Chinese should be feared.

The recent statements and our defense ministers official statement is that "China is our number one enemy".

)))))))))))))) who is NOT your enemy?

By the way you should have pissed of seeing ekta Kapoor with a bh-indi



Will be packed and be removed by India from our lands.

bhenddiiii? i thought that is oversized cow

I expect ignorance from " some" groups here but to see silly comments from Indians is surprising. This is a vanilla statement, if at all really aimed at pakistan who is going to have a bigger arsenal than EU soon vs. India , but has India named in the mix just to not come off one sided.

It is a vanilla statement sent out as a " global " concern. Try to read the bigger picture vs. silly little chest thumping.

global concern got India at bottom of US stick.

Why doesnt India first take care of its own concern rather than finding shoulders of others to shoot

 

[Srinivas]

evaluating other options indeed a wise step BUT only if the Indian Govt is doing so out of wiseness NOT under pressure from warmongering media here the case is later one and that is something that can be with stupid outcome

There is no such thing as a stupid here, these stupid guys came to bully us and they have to go back, when it comes to defending our lands , call is war mongering or anything it is justified".

We are not attempting to claim anything here, we are defending our lands.

Calling our media in this aspect as war mongering is not justified.

)))))))))))))) who is NOT your enemy?

Yes Chinese have problems with all its neighbors Its a long List , Pakistan too have problems with all its neighbors Pakistan has also enemies like Israel who do not share or harm anything Pakistan has

India has only two Pakistan and China.

bhenddiiii? i thought that is oversized cow

May be an oversized Ninja is ok for you.

 

[Psyops]

Follow your daddy boys

 

[Sergi]

Follow your daddy boys

You are doing pretty fine to be a troll. I am just wondering why Chinese members are not considering you one of them. Any ideas ???

 

[FaujHistorian]

We [Indians] true to minimum credible nuclear deterrence and our numbers hasn't gone up.


It is good that our threatening has been heard three oceans away. Good Job Mr. S.Saran. Now USA will tell Pakistan not to do any misadventure ...

If INdia has the deterrence, then why would an Indian need to threaten anyone?
If India has the deterrence, then why would Indians need anyone else to come save their @rses?

The logic my dear poster does not make sense at all.

Please revise.

Thank you

 

[newdelhinsa]

If INdia has the deterrence, then why would an Indian need to threaten anyone?
If India has the deterrence, then why would Indians need anyone else to come save their @rses?

The logic my dear poster does not make sense at all.

Please revise.

Thank you

I don't think you have capability to have intelligent discourse on strategic military issues.

I have answered Spring Onion member why It was needed and things need to be made clear, threatening is on condition of being attacked in backdrop of what Pakistan is doing vis a vis it's nuclear weapon program. Don't pretend innocent.

As far as asking anyone to save our *** is concerned then no one has asked anyone but we know Americans will be more then happy to curb Pakistan's nuclear itch during any conflict, every assistance is welcomed. At the end of the day the asymmetrical war (to put it in nice words) you are running needs to be fixed.

 

[JayAtl]

global concern got India at bottom of US stick.

Why doesnt India first take care of its own concern rather than finding shoulders of others to shoot

I don't with which face you go have the chutzpah to make such claims about India having " bottom of US stick" , when you are being pounded by US drones and your sovereignty is laughed at by the US. It's like you guys live in another universe .

 

[whitefox011]

Follow your daddy boys

holy **** i visit this site 2-3 times a day and i see you online every time i guess you are unemployed? oh wait you must belong to the ***** army how much did you earn this month?

 

[Kloitra]

Please read the whole article, and you will see it is filled with incorrect assumptions I was complaining about.


Thank you

The article is rhetoric, and need to be ignored.

My question was that Shyam Saran answered a query related to use of tactical nukes, which BTW are meant against India, and thus require a policy from Indians. How does it makes him stupid @rse?

If INdia has the deterrence, then why would an Indian need to threaten anyone?
If India has the deterrence, then why would Indians need anyone else to come save their @rses?

The logic my dear poster does not make sense at all.

Please revise.

Thank you

How is it threatening? Pakistan developing tactical nukes, and India saying they would be treated the same way as strategic.

"India will not be the first to use nuclear weapons, but if it is attacked with such weapons, it would engage in nuclear retaliation which will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage on its adversary. The label on a nuclear weapon used for attacking India, strategic or tactical, is irrelevant from the Indian perspective."

This has been Indian policy, accept for the added part that it wont differentiate between tactical and strategic. Average Pakistani poster takes pride in its tactical nukes/Nasr, but ridicules any doctrine against it, is that your stand too?

I don't with which face you go have the chutzpah to make such claims about India having " bottom of US stick" , when you are being pounded by US drones and your sovereignty is laughed at by the US. It's like you guys live in another universe .

So what if I am drowning in a hole full of sh*t, look, you stepped in mud ha ha ha...

 

[Spring Onion]

I don't with which face you go have the chutzpah to make such claims about India having " bottom of US stick" , when you are being pounded by US drones and your sovereignty is laughed at by the US. It's like you guys live in another universe .

come again with some solid argument. Your post shows you have lost it already.

so much so for your global concern

 

[Pakistanisage]

This is typical US HYPOCRISY as it leans on South Asian powers to restrain their nuclear stockpile while maintaining tens of thousands of highly advanced Nuclear Weapons.

 

[JayAtl]

come again with some solid argument. Your post shows you have lost it already.

so much so for your global concern