What's new

US asks India, Pakistan to restrain their nuclear, missile programmes

Just yesterday your Indian official had said India will launch a Nuclear attack in event of a small attack on it.

And today you got this warning from US.

the point is India is trying to divert public attention from Chinese tents
Get your facts straight- the comments came from a RETIRED official and his comments were India would respond with nuclear weapons if attacked with NUCLEAR weapons regardless of the size of the weapon/attack. India has a clear policy of only using nukes when attacked by nukes.


Pakistan has no such policy.
 
.
Get your facts straight- the comments came from a RETIRED official and his comments were India would respond with nuclear weapons if attacked with NUCLEAR weapons regardless of the size of the weapon/attack. India has a clear policy of only using nukes when attacked by nukes.


Pakistan has no such policy.



Shyam Saran, convener of the National Security Advisory Board of INDIA.


and the funniest thing is that when Pakistan is developing small strategic weapons that does NOT mean we are mulling to attack you.

The indians are in a habbit to create tension and then try to add up to the same tension for seeking some attention and diverting attention from local issues
 
.
Just yesterday your Indian official had said India will launch a Nuclear attack in event of a small attack on it.

And today you got this warning from US.

the point is India is trying to divert public attention from Chinese tents

But why your Amrica bhadur has given warning to Pakistan as well.

A nuclear strike will be answered back with a nuclear strike that was the curx of his statement. Don't mislead people with your usual green lies. No Indian has diverted its attention from Chinese Incursion after his statement, so don't write for sake of writing.
 
.
Shyam Saran, convener of the National Security Advisory Board of INDIA.


and the funniest thing is that when Pakistan is developing small strategic weapons that does NOT mean we are mulling to attack you.

The indians are in a habbit to create tension and then try to add up to the same tension for seeking some attention and diverting attention from local issues

Why is everything a conspiracy to you guys? As if everything is running to some great script.


And pray tell me who is that small nuke being developed for of not India? And the weapons is being developed in the size it is so that it can be used on a TACTICAL level which is exactly what the official was talking about- no matter what the size of the nuke, a nuke is a nuke and it will provoke a nuclear response from India.


Let's be honest we all know that Pakistan has created a nuke so as to match India on this front and try and cancel out India's conventional superiority this is common knowledge. Side-stepping the truth isn't going to get you anywhere.
 
.
But why your Amrica bhadur has given warning to Pakistan as well.

A nuclear strike will be answered back with a nuclear strike that was the curx of his statement. Don't mislead people with your usual green lies. No Indian has diverted its attention from Chinese Incursion after his statement, so don't write for sake of writing.

1. We are used to listen to such rants from US. who cares. Its your turn. This US statement came in light of your uncalled for nuclear attack threatening statment against Pakistan, thats what matters.

2. Your statement was nothing but a frustrated try to divert attention. Even idiots know that if he is attacked with nukes he will retaliate in same. Why you Indians even imagine war that too a nuke war on daily basis.

Why is everything a conspiracy to you guys? As if everything is running to some great script.


And pray tell me who is that small nuke being developed for of not India? And the weapons is being developed in the size it is so that it can be used on a TACTICAL level which is exactly what the official was talking about- no matter what the size of the nuke, a nuke is a nuke and it will provoke a nuclear response from India.


Let's be honest we all know that Pakistan has created a nuke so as to match India on this front and try and cancel out India's conventional superiority this is common knowledge. Side-stepping the truth isn't going to get you anywhere.

we have many threats.

1. India. If you attack us we must have some tactical weapon to act rapidly.

2. developing small tactical weapons are also ensuring to fightback any attempt by super power/s to disarm us.

3. Indeed Pakistan developed nukes to nullify Indian conventional superiority. With your Indian army and weapons expanding rapidly its OUR right to develop ours. Whats the issue there? Should we sit still
 
.
Just yesterday your Indian official had said India will launch a Nuclear attack in event of a small attack on it.

And today you got this warning from US.

the point is India is trying to divert public attention from Chinese tents

No it is not, incursion is still a headline in our news.

India just explained its Nuclear doctrine clearly. It becomes a warning to anybody who had intention of using nukes.
 
.
No it is not, incursion is still a headline in our news.

India just explained its Nuclear doctrine clearly. It becomes a warning to anybody who had intention of using nukes.

So again the bottom line is that PI$$ED at China, you Indians opted to issue warning to Pakistan but in reality you wanted the Chinese to hear the warning.

mmmm sissies

oh by the way its Ekta Kapoor house raid that is headline not Chinese camping anymore
 
.
1. We are used to listen to such rants from US. who cares. Its your turn. This US statement came in light of your uncalled for nuclear attack threatening statment against Pakistan, thats what matters.

2. Your statement was nothing but a frustrated try to divert attention. Even idiots know that if he is attacked with nukes he will retaliate in same. Why you Indians even imagine war that too a nuke war on daily basis.

Mate just read what he actually said beige you start over analysing and making assumptions. It's funny that you claim that India is trying to divert attention away from x and y. Let me tell you that outside of S.Asia no one is covering the Chinese incursion, no one is interested, no one is giving it any attention so the idea that all this is cooked up to divert attention away is just nonsense. And do you think if that weren't the case the Indian govt could give two hoots about international attention? Are they a bunch of shy school boys? If they were so scared of attention would they have indulged in the diplomatic tussle over the Italianarines that brought about world-wide attention?

Just so illogical.

And how were the remarks "uncalled for"? This sounds like the comments of a teenage girl.


India's nuclear doctrine is inherently defensive so reiterating this can't provoke anyone and if it does that says more about your insecurities than anything else.

1. We are used to listen to such rants from US. who cares. Its your turn. This US statement came in light of your uncalled for nuclear attack threatening statment against Pakistan, thats what matters.

2. Your statement was nothing but a frustrated try to divert attention. Even idiots know that if he is attacked with nukes he will retaliate in same. Why you Indians even imagine war that too a nuke war on daily basis.



we have many threats.

1. India. If you attack us we must have some tactical weapon to act rapidly.

2. developing small tactical weapons are also ensuring to fightback any attempt by super power/s to disarm us.

3. Indeed Pakistan developed nukes to nullify Indian conventional superiority. With your Indian army and weapons expanding rapidly its OUR right to develop ours. Whats the issue there? Should we sit still

All fair points and all the official said was that any nuke attack on India or its forces would be met in kind- THAT IS ALL. There's nothing alarmist in these comments- is there?
 
.
Shyam Saran, convener of the National Security Advisory Board of INDIA.


and the funniest thing is that when Pakistan is developing small strategic weapons that does NOT mean we are mulling to attack you.

The indians are in a habbit to create tension and then try to add up to the same tension for seeking some attention and diverting attention from local issues


You are correct my dear posters, but many Indian posters will (sadly) ignore this.

Coming back to the thread.

This $tupid @rse Shyam Saran, convener of the National Security Advisory Board of INDIA utters and blabbers,

then

USA said something something something,

And here we go,

$hit shoveling between Indian and Pak posters is on.



Don't we care about each other?

Don't we know that any nukie exchange will destroy our wheat fields, the rice paddies, and above all thousands of years of shared heritage?

What are we?


chimps living in caves, that we don't even fing care about our rivers, our lakes, our forests, and our canals?


Is it because some poster living in America gives two hoots to what happens to his mother-fing-land?


What is this mandness, the jinguism?

You all think that just because there is a line on a map saying country X on this side of line and country Y on the other side, means we have nothing fing in common, not even humanity?


Sure we have done $tupid things in the past.


Must we continue repeating them over and over and over and fing over and over?


Why don't we see Indians and Paks stand up and raise slogans against nukie bombs?

Where is our "smart" ness that we try and try and hope the whole world is impressed with it.

Then the whole world laughs at us the way we treat each other, talk bad about each other, and shovel $hit everywhere we get into some insane tiny argument?

I for one say Pakistan should get rid of the fing nukes.

We have million strong standing army, and equally martial people aka civilians.

Why do we need to fear from anyone, especially from our neighboring country with home we share food, clothing, and every other aspect of this beautiful culture.

Why?

We don't need the nukie bombs

we need peace and prosperity.


And it ain't happening as long as Pakistanis pinch Indians,

or

Indians continue their mad clown-@rse stuff against Pakistan.

Just one thing keeps Indians weak against other big powers in the region. Just one thing. the mean-ness and $tupid rivalry against Pakistan.

And same is true for Pakistan.

It is time to wake up you all $hit shovelers. It is time to wake up.


peace
 
.
Mate just read what he actually said beige you start over analysing and making assumptions. It's funny that you claim that India is trying to divert attention away from x and y. Let me tell you that outside of S.Asia no one is covering the Chinese incursion, no one is interested, no one is giving it any attention so the idea that all this is cooked up to divert attention away is just nonsense. And do you think if that weren't the case the Indian govt could give two hoots about international attention? Are they a bunch of shy school boys? If they were so scared of attention would they have indulged in the diplomatic tussle over the Italianarines that brought about world-wide attention?


TO divert the LOCAL PUBLIC attention in India NOT The world. The World is NOT interested in tents.



And how were the remarks "uncalled for"? This sounds like the comments of a teenage girl.


India's nuclear doctrine is inherently defensive so reiterating this can't provoke anyone and if it does that says more about your insecurities than anything else.



All fair points and all the official said was that any nuke attack on India or its forces would be met in kind- THAT IS ALL. There's nothing alarmist in these comments- is there?

Saran was behaving like a teenage girl when he has to hurled the warning "IF" "IF" you know IF and But are words that are used for weak warning and \these represent weakness of the speaker and his imaginative fears.
 
. .
So again the bottom line is that PI$$ED at China, you Indians opted to issue warning to Pakistan but in reality you wanted the Chinese to hear the warning.

mmmm sissies

oh by the way its Ekta Kapoor house raid that is headline not Chinese camping anymore

India is not worried about some 30 odd brain washed chinese tenting inside Indian territory, we are evaluating our options beyond diplomacy.

Regarding our policy explanation we can also issue warnings to China, why the hell do you think Chinese should be feared.

The recent statements and our defense ministers official statement is that "China is our number one enemy".

By the way you should have pissed of seeing ekta Kapoor with a bh-indi ;)

The Chinese Tents.

Will be packed and be removed by India from our lands.
 
.
You are correct my dear posters, but many Indian posters will (sadly) ignore this.

Coming back to the thread.

This $tupid @rse Shyam Saran, convener of the National Security Advisory Board of INDIA utters and blabbers,

I wasn't expecting you to fall to her level.

He is convener of NSAB of India. His exact statement was:

"India will not be the first to use nuclear weapons, but if it is attacked with such weapons, it would engage in nuclear retaliation which will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage on its adversary. The label on a nuclear weapon used for attacking India, strategic or tactical, is irrelevant from the Indian perspective."

And that was in reply to a specific question. Does stating Indian policy over nukes is considered uttering and blabbering?
No where did he said implied an impending war.
 
.
The Problem is Geographical Area they are very small country and we are conventionally very strong so they just put the First use for deterring us from attacking them .Their Policy is Don't mesh with Us its very simple.

What's the problem? If both India and Pakistan had a "no first use" policy the chances of a nuclear war would be practically non-existent. It is the ambiguity around Pakistan's nuclear threshold and Pakistan's apparent willingness to escalate any conventional war into a nuclear one that keeps the risks of a nuclear apocalypse alive.
 
.
I



And that was in reply to a specific question. Does stating Indian policy over nukes is considered uttering and blabbering?
No where did he said implied an impending war.

Please read the whole article, and you will see it is filled with incorrect assumptions I was complaining about.


Thank you
 
.
Back
Top Bottom