UN refused to interfare between India and Pakistan

[Verve]

India also supported the Sri Lankan govt later once the Tamil Tigers went rogue and no we do not support TTP or BLA or MQM that is some dumb bullshit from your green media, if you have any prove present it to the world!

The international community is well aware of ISI activities as they have evidence.

Pakistan's spy agency ISI accused of kidnapping and killing journalists | World news | theguardian.com

Pakistan intelligence services 'aided Mumbai terror attacks' | World news | The Guardian

The world is aware between the nexus ties between the ISI and it's state proxies but there is no concrete evidence that RAW supports such groups inside Pakistan.

And has Pakistan's ISI ever been convicted in any War Crimes or International Court? If we are green media, you must be orange and so on ... USSR was the world's biggest criminal during the anti-communist era, and you were her strong ally ... times change, medias change, targets change, allies change ... life goes on. Media also said that CIA was behind Kennedy's assassination, did anything happen to CIA? Nope ... so what if ISI is in the media ... all that matters to us Pakistanis is no invaders step in Pakistan, and if they do then we'll butcher them on our soil first before going to theirs.

 

[Kinetic]

It's not like our Khandan never killed bhartis before. We are Muslim and not scared of death.

You are born to kill each other. No one likes a killer. and we punish them.

 

[danger007]

Other than a few money driven politicians, and those are not true patriotic Pakistanis, we don't really give a flying F about UN or you for that matter. RAW/CIA puppets TTP are being dealt with ruthelessly, and we don't even need 600k soldiers in those areas to do that.

Both sides support certain movements across the borders, so no one is a saint. To say one is more to blame than other would be plain foolish as ISI and RAW operate well across the borders and have been for decades. If we are supporting the Kashmiris, you are supporting TTP, BLA & MQM. You supported Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, and we supported Sri Lankan govt!

Next war between us will be the bloodiest, if it happens, and you and I will most likely not survive a nuclear war (conventional war is highly unlikely now). So let us both hope that it doesn't come down to that.

I am not sure about you.. but you don't have enough fire power to wipe out huge India .... if you guys are foolish .... we don't have problem. ... even if you fought Nuke war... i don't think so... anybody in pqk will survive to claim kashmir

 

[janon]

all that matters to us Pakistanis is no invaders step in Pakistan, and if they do then we'll butcher them on our soil first before going to theirs.

Didn't work out too well when invaders cut your country into two, did it? Bravado is easy.

 

[Yeti]

And has Pakistan's ISI ever been convicted in any War Crimes or International Court? If we are green media, you must be orange and so on ... USSR was the world's biggest criminal during the anti-communist era, and you were her strong ally ... times change, medias change, targets change, allies change ... life goes on. Media also said that CIA was behind Kennedy's assassination, did anything happen to CIA? Nope ... so what if ISI is in the media ... all that matters to us Pakistanis is no invaders step in Pakistan, and if they do then we'll butcher them on our soil first before going to theirs.

But the international community is going to penetrate those state backed proxies as they pose a threat to both regional and global security.

Shortly after India and the US announced that they would work together to disrupt financial support for al-Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba, the US Treasury Department designated three Pakistan-based individuals, including Harkat-ul-Mujahideen leader Fazlur Rehman Khalil, as global terrorists.
The action appeared swift, coming close on the heels of a joint India-US statement issued at the end of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit that spoke of the “need for joint and concerted efforts” to counter terrorism in South Asia and West Asia.
More significantly, the statement specifically referred to joint action to “disrupt all financial and tactical support for networks such as al-Qaeda, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, the D-Company, and the Haqqanis”.

 

[@RV]

Divert rivers first, then talk ... indians will be first ever to divert a big river in the history of mankind let alone 6+ rivers entering Pakistan ... you idiot, if India had the landscape for all these rivers to flow to the sea via India, they would have flown as such. You can build all the dams you want to stop water but in full blown war situation all it takes is one missile to destroy a dam!

And yeah, I'll happily be a terrorist and terrorise you twats if you enter my country. Until then I'd rather that you twats stay in your territory, and we terrorists stay in ours.

1. Right we can't divert whole rivers but we can always make canals to divert portion of that water to our mainland.
2. You can't destroy these dams in wartime unless you are a headless Idiot. Natural flow of these rivers are towards Pakistan. Destroy it, then die in floods. So these dams are a strategic asset also. Think about it if you can.
3. We won't enter your country, why would we. We never tried and never will. Can't you see even after winning east Pakistan we vacated it and made a new country.

One thing, stop giving yourself too much importance. We don't want to invade you, you simply don't deserve to be invaded.

 

[ssethii]

You people do realize that Kashmir issue is not going to be resolved in a nutshell.

 

[Verve]

I am not sure about you.. but you don't have enough fire power to wipe out huge India .... if you guys are foolish .... we don't have problem. ... even if you fought Nuke war... i don't think so... anybody in pqk will survive to claim kashmir

Let's not be so foolish here! Both countries are very capable of sending each other to oblivion. In you hyped up case of only Pakistan becoming a no mans land, 70% plus of India will become that too and all of suburban India will be decimated too. So plz don't live in a fool's paradise that India will survive. A 200million populated Pakistan is well capable of leaving India with nothing but 200million farmers/villagers. Is that the future you want of India?

As someone so rightly said, Pakistan is not the only muslim country whereas India is the ONLY hindu country .... india should survive as a piece of a huge patchwork of nuclear wasteland, but will it really be India anymore that you see it today ... very unlikely if nuclear war breaks out. Americans couldn't stop Japanese suicide pilots and had to resort to a nuclear bomb, you think we Pakistanis will just sit back and let you both us without taking you to wherever you believe in afterlife with us? Keep dreaming. Nuclear warfare is not a joke.

 

[Verve]

1. Right we can't divert whole rivers but we can always make canals to divert portion of that water to our mainland.
2. You can't destroy these dams in wartime unless you are a headless Idiot. Natural flow of these rivers are towards Pakistan. Destroy it, then die in floods. So these dams are a strategic asset also. Think about it if you can.
3. We won't enter your country, why would we. We never tried and never will. Can't you see even after winning east Pakistan we vacated it and made a new country.

One thing, stop giving yourself too much importance. We don't want to invade you, you simply don't deserve to be invaded.

Canals are fine with us. Starve us of water and that will lead to war as hungry will prefer death during a fight to survive instead of opting to die without doing anything.

Destroying dams is easier, if there are dams in Pakistan to contain the flood entering.

Yes you have entered Pakistan, stop with the utter lies. Kashmir is an internationally recognised DISPUTED territory, and Pakistani army only entered Kasmir. Whereas India attacked across international borders twice first, in 1965 (sialkot and lahore) and then in 1971 (east Pakistan).

 

[danger007]

Let's not be so foolish here! Both countries are very capable of sending each other to oblivion. In you hyped up case of only Pakistan becoming a no mans land, 70% plus of India will become that too and all of suburban India will be decimated too. So plz don't live in a fool's paradise that India will survive. A 200million populated Pakistan is well capable of leaving India with nothing but 200million farmers/villagers. Is that the future you want of India?

As someone so rightly said, Pakistan is not the only muslim country whereas India is the ONLY hindu country .... india should survive as a piece of a huge patchwork of nuclear wasteland, but will it really be India anymore that you see it today ... very unlikely if nuclear war breaks out. Americans couldn't stop Japanese suicide pilots and had to resort to a nuclear bomb, you think we Pakistanis will just sit back and let you both us without taking you to wherever you believe in afterlife with us? Keep dreaming. Nuclear warfare is not a joke.

I know about nuke war... lol.. it was you guys who bringing nukes everywhere. .. lol ... you are quite lot... you got 100+ nukes ... do you know how much impact it will create ??? are you aware botj countries nukes yeild very low.... No 100 nukes are not enough to cause 70% Damage. .. yoj might target metros but you don't have power to fire all nukes you got... kid..

Canals are fine with us. Starve us of water and that will lead to war as hungry will fight to survive instead of opting to die without doing anything.

Destroying dams is easier, if there are dams in Pakistan to contain the flood entering.

Yes you have entered Pakistan, stop with the utter lies. Kashmir is an internationally recognised DISPUTED territory, and Pakistani army only entered Kasmir. Whereas India attacked across international borders twice first, in 1965 (sialkot and lahore) and then in 1971 (east Pakistan).

if you destroy dams... most of Pakistan will be wiped out with floods... lol

 

[@RV]

Canals are fine with us. Starve us of water and that will lead to war as hungry will prefer death during a fight to survive instead of opting to die without doing anything.

Destroying dams is easier, if there are dams in Pakistan to contain the flood entering.

Yes you have entered Pakistan, stop with the utter lies. Kashmir is an internationally recognised DISPUTED territory, and Pakistani army only entered Kasmir. Whereas India attacked across international borders twice first, in 1965 (sialkot and lahore) and then in 1971 (east Pakistan).

No we won't starve you of water or anything. And why are you so desperate of war, please start some sport and forget about war as a game .

You don't have dams to contain water in Pakistan now, Invalid point.

And about Bangladesh, we didn't had much of a choice. There are a lot of people already here so we can't accommodate additional migrants. It was not invasion, It was a Indian help for Bangladeshis.

 

[Verve]

I know about nuke war... lol.. it was you guys who bringing nukes everywhere. .. lol ... you are quite lot... you got 100+ nukes ... do you know how much impact it will create ??? are you aware botj countries nukes yeild very low.... No 100 nukes are not enough to cause 70% Damage. .. yoj might target metros but you don't have power to fire all nukes you got... kid..


if you destroy dams... most of Pakistan will be wiped out with floods... lol

We bring up the nukes to remind you Indians that conventional wars are a thing of past and that you should stop dreaming that you can break us up. USSR is the only nuclear state that broke, and that too because it expended beyond a manageable size. Pakistan is not on an expanding adventure and yes BD was strategically extremely difficult to contain so it went, good for both PK and BD actually that it happened. If BD had not been East Pakistan, it would've been part of India in 1947! As for Pakistan now, we can defend our bordeds and will go down to nuclear route if any attempts of slicing up are made. And this is what you guys fail to understand even in the pre-independence times when Nehru thought Pakistan won't survive a week and India will take over!

 

[Omega007]

Canals are fine with us. Starve us of water and that will lead to war as hungry will prefer death during a fight to survive instead of opting to die without doing anything.

Destroying dams is easier, if there are dams in Pakistan to contain the flood entering.

Yes you have entered Pakistan, stop with the utter lies. Kashmir is an internationally recognised DISPUTED territory, and Pakistani army only entered Kasmir. Whereas India attacked across international borders twice first, in 1965 (sialkot and lahore) and then in 1971 (east Pakistan).

Well,India didt enter West Pakistan even in 1971.In fact,in 1971,Indian Army captured much more territory in Western sector compared to what it did i 65!!In fact,the total West Pakistani area that India had captured,was almost the same as Bangladesh itself!!

 

[danger007]

We bring up the nukes to remind you Indians that conventional wars are a thing of past and that you should stop dreaming that you can break us up. USSR is the only nuclear state that broke, and that too because it expended beyond a manageable size. Pakistan is not on an expanding adventure and yes BD was strategically extremely difficult to contain so it went, good for both PK and BD actually that it happened. If BD had not been East Pakistan, it would've been part of India in 1947! As for Pakistan now, we can defend our bordeds and will go down to nuclear route if any attempts of slicing up are made. And this is what you guys fail to understand even in the pre-independence times when Nehru thought Pakistan won't survive a week and India will take over!

funny... leave it kid...

 

[Verve]

No we won't starve you of water or anything. And why are you so desperate of war, please start some sport and forget about war as a game .

You don't have dams to contain water in Pakistan now, Invalid point.

And about Bangladesh, we didn't had much of a choice. There are a lot of people already here so we can't accommodate additional migrants. It was not invasion, It was a Indian help for Bangladeshis.

Yes you were helping 'terrorists' revolt (just as we were in Kashmir) and that organisation was disbanded after BD's independence and the leader of that terrorist organisation had rope around his neck. Help!! Yeah!! We are helping Kashmiris ... nothing wrong with that if you were just helping BDs!