What's new

UN ignores Pakistan bid to seek intervention on Kashmir?

No - requesting a UNGA or UNSC meeting on the issue would "imply" that the intent was for UN intervention.

Quite lame.

Pak seeking UN intervention in Kashmir is no hidden truth. All these letters are meant to get some sort of devoured attention.
Or you mean to say there are relatives of pakistan out there in UN who need to be told home story?
 
.
Quite lame.

Pak seeking UN intervention in Kashmir is no hidden truth. All these letters are meant to get some sort of devoured attention.
Or you mean to say there are relatives of pakistan out there in UN who need to be told home story?
I am pointing out the obvious facts in the letter written to the UN by Sartaj Aziz - there was no request made in the letter of UN intervention nor was any attempt made to call a session of the UNGA or UNSC to address the issues mentioned in the letter.

So the question of whether "inside relatives are providing you with these lame and childish interpretations about the letter to the UN written by Sartaj Aziz, splashed everywhere by the Indian media" is really for you and others who buy into your "interpretations" ...
 
.
I am pointing out the obvious facts in the letter written to the UN by Sartaj Aziz - there was no request made in the letter of UN intervention nor was any attempt made to call a session of the UNGA or UNSC to address the issues mentioned in the letter.

So the question of whether "inside relatives are providing you with these lame and childish interpretations about the letter to the UN written by Sartaj Aziz, splashed everywhere by the Indian media" is really for you and others who buy into your "interpretations" ...

There is a term called "building inning" in cricket.
 
.
There is a term called "building inning" in cricket.
Pakistan's objective is to highlight her position on the recent ceasefire violations, and show the Modi regime as irrational and confrontational, and the communications with the UNSG, P5, foreign legislatures and diplomatic corps (along with Modi and the BJP and Indian media's ranting and raving) all serve that end.
 
.
Pakistan's objective is to highlight her position on the recent ceasefire violations, and show the Modi regime as irrational and confrontational, and the communications with the UNSG, P5, foreign legislatures and diplomatic corps (along with Modi and the BJP and Indian media's ranting and raving) all serve that end.

But the problem is that Pakistan 's position in Global Diplomacy and Economics is weak.. so whatever Pakistan says at global stage holds less or no water against India.. as world does not care about your position or your aspirations.
As of now Pakistan is no more then an insignificant troll for India.. a troll that can irritate for sometime..but cant do much.
 
.
To be fair, India has had its own failures and errors of judgment in dealing with Pakistan, and there is much that it can also do to improve the situation.
You presuppose that a democratic, stable Pakistan making rational decisions is what India is seeking.

What if that were not the case? What if what India wants is an Islamist Pakistan with on and off military rule and Shariah implemented. You know the result of societies with Shariah and no oil wealth - maybe that is what we are looking for.
 
.
You presuppose that a democratic, stable Pakistan making rational decisions is what India is seeking.

What if that were not the case? What if what India wants is an Islamist Pakistan with on and off military rule and Shariah implemented. You know the result of societies with Shariah and no oil wealth - maybe that is what we are looking for.

All I will say is "Be careful what you wish for!" if that were indeed the case.
 
.
All I will say is "Be careful what you wish for!" if that were indeed the case.
Truly.
But that is something to consider is it not. A state that can not be collapsed by external means - by war or other.... has to be collapsed/rendered anemic/cut by internal means.

There is no better weapon we can wield than one which the Pakistani population willingly braces and breathes and is happy to die for. Islam.
 
.
But the problem is that Pakistan 's position in Global Diplomacy and Economics is weak.. so whatever Pakistan says at global stage holds less or no water against India.. as world does not care about your position or your aspirations.
Strengthening a weak position requires hard work and a foundation, Pakistan's diplomatic moves in this regard are part of that process, a process that has been helped by Modi's existing perceptions of being a genocidal maniac and irrational war-monger.
 
.
Strengthening a weak position requires hard work and a foundation, Pakistan's diplomatic moves in this regard are part of that process, a process that has been helped by Modi's existing perceptions of being a genocidal maniac and irrational war-monger.
You screwed around with world for 6 odd decades... and now you are making efforts.. and now you want world to believe you.... thats' called hoping against hope... All your leadership has done so far is get a whiners label attached to you guys...The world does not listen to Pakistan now... as i said... you are insignificant trolls... and no one cares .
 
.
You screwed around with world for 6 odd decades... and now you are making efforts.. and now you want world to believe you.... thats' called hoping against hope... All your leadership has done so far is get a whiners label attached to you guys...The world does not listen to Pakistan now... as i said... you are insignificant trolls... and no one cares .
On the contrary, the UNSG's response and offer to mediate if asked endorsed the Pakistani position on the Simla Agreement, in that it does not prevent third party mediation, and the world has supported the Pakistani position that dialog should be used and violence along the LoC ended, which is a slap in the face of Modi and his "our Army will continue jumping around and firing crackers at Pakistan until my 56 inch chest turns into a 20 foot chest and a crane is needed to lift me in and out of my house".
 
.
On the contrary, the UNSG's response and offer to mediate if asked endorsed the Pakistani position on the Simla Agreement, in that it does not prevent third party mediation, and the world has supported the Pakistani position that dialog should be used and violence along the LoC ended, which is a slap in the face of Modi and his "our Army will continue jumping around and firing crackers at Pakistan until my 56 inch chest turns into a 20 foot chest and a crane is needed to lift me in and out of my house".
I wonder if this is called supporting: UN snubs Pak, says won’t interfere on Kashmir - Hindustan Times
 
. .
No, this is called "Indian Media ranting and raving and concocting imaginary interpretations to puff up Modi's 56 inch chest".
Whatever..... I am still to see a Pakistani News item on recent UN response ... everything died down after UN rejected Pakistani ranting.
 
.
Pakistan's objective is to highlight her position on the recent ceasefire violations, and show the Modi regime as irrational and confrontational, and the communications with the UNSG, P5, foreign legislatures and diplomatic corps (along with Modi and the BJP and Indian media's ranting and raving) all serve that end.

and then not seek intervention?? Your argument is incoherent.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom