What's new

Turks down 'Russian plane violating their airspace'

He meant that Babur, the first Mughal King who established Mughal Empire to rule for 500-600 years, came from Farghana in Uzbekistan, which is a Turkic country. Plus Turkic people played a vital role in establishment and strengthening of Dehli Sultanates for hundreds of years before Mughal Empire. Along with Mahmud Ghaznavi who was again Turkic ethnically !!!

Well, I was telling Indians that Hindi contains lots of borrowed Turkic words as it was dominated by Turks for a long time. Once Britain created India and allow India to rule themselves, Indians screw their own country up so badly that it's now notorious for being a rapist country.
 
Well, I was telling Indians that Hindi contains lots of borrowed Turkic words as it was dominated by Turks for a long time. Once Britain created India and allow India to rule themselves, Indians screw their own country up so badly that it's now notorious for being a rapist country.

Technically it was in 1947, that Hindu community was able to rule India after a 1000 year domination by Muslim elites and then the British. They couldn't handle it and now we have the likes of Mr Modi, who , with the world's 40% malnourished children in his country, thinks he is a super power !!!
 
@MadDog

@Luca1

I wrote before
Turkey, Iran, Pakistan and most Central Asian countries and occupied Turkestan are
relatives.

Timur - Turkish Emperor

was a Turco-Mongol conqueror and the founder of the Timurid Empire in Persia and Central Asia. He was also the first ruler in the Timurid dynast

Timur - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yes definitely, there are certain ethnic groups of Western and Norther Pakistan which are turkic, eg: Hazaras and ethnics groups in the Northern part. Along with that there are certain tribes/families (such as Qizalbash ) who are descendants of those turkic people who settled in subcontinent , here is an example
Karlugh Turks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Urdu also shares a lot of words with Turkish !!!
 
I was wondering if those jets are turkish jets bombing Kurdish terrorists
 
Lol its useless arguing with someone who believes Russia stands any chance in case of an conventional expeditionary war with NATO(U.S&E.U combined.+ Turkey). No point going into details. Its a huge joke.:coffee:

After seeing NATO's pathetic performance against ISIS and how badly NATO is dependent on Russian logistics abilities in terms of Il-76 and An-124's ,NATO is very overrated. A properly placed blow and NATO will be gone and collapse like a pack of cards.



Go in your Ashram aq



MIG-29 is scrap, our Pakistan brothers shot down many MI and SU along Afghan boarder and lost only one F-16 with friendly accidentally fire



Greetings to our Albanian friends

Pakistani shot down mig-23 and mig-21 ,su-22 of afghans and russians not mig-29. Soviet and Afghan pilots were ordered not to engage Pakistani aviation forces during the course of the war .
 
The hell are you talking about.

Same shit which you are talking about

@jamahir this puny nation under control of NATO thinks that they can take over Russia. Russia don't give a **** to NATO or USA, forget about Turkey. Don't live in Ottoman era. You were playing with a war torn Syria and you could have done anything when Al Asad was all alone and that too under the umbrella of NATO.Now you know your dad is near by and will rain hell shit on you if you play dirty games. Stay in your sense if you want to see Turkey alive.
 
Anyway , it's not the time for nukes .. Turkey respond to Russian violation to their airspace can be really hard , not to mention economic response , Gas line which was transfered to Turkey instead of Bulgaria

Wouldn't Turkey be spiting its own nose if it disallows Russian gas transit though its territory or forces a shift in the transit pipeline plan? Yes, the ceasing of gas flow would harm Russia, and the rest of Russia's customers but considering Turkey would collect a toll for every X amount of time or quantity of gas moved through its territory, same as other transit countries like Ukraine, it would deprive itself of a reliable source of revenue. Abandoning the pipeline project would simply shift it elsewhere and again, Turkey would be deprived of both revenue and leverage. Turkey isn't the only alternative Russia has for its pipeline project in Europe.

Turkey can cause economic damage to Russia, especially now that Russia needs Turkey more than ever as Europe (Russia's main export market) and Russia feud, but Turkey cannot do so without harming itself either. The best way to respond is simply to put up a strong front, increase your defenses and push forward with your military modernization to dissuade future action or aggression. Not everything or every action requires an ill-planned response. That's how these conflict start in the first place.

According to Gazprom there are no political affairs holding up or interfering with the proposed Turkish Stream project. UPI reports in an article titled Russia: No political issues with Turkish pipeline.

*I can't post links.
 
Pakistani shot down mig-23 and mig-21 ,su-22 of afghans and russians not mig-29. Soviet and Afghan pilots were ordered not to engage Pakistani aviation forces during the course of the war .

Bull F***** Crap, Russians even bombed areas inside Pakistan and Pakistani border posts, they were ordered to engage but got a thrashing by PAF !!!
 
Wouldn't Turkey be spiting its own nose if it disallows Russian gas transit though its territory or forces a shift in the transit pipeline plan? Yes, the ceasing of has flow would harm Russia, and the rest of Russia's customers but considering Turkey would collect a toll for every X amount of time or quantity of gas moved through its territory, same as other transit countries like Ukraine, it would deprive itself of a reliable source of revenue. Abandoning the pipeline project would simply shift it elsewhere and again, Turkey would be deprived of both revenue and leverage.

Turkey can cause economic damage to Russia, especially now that Russia needs Turkey more than ever as Europe (Russia's main export market) and Russia feud, but Turkey cannot do so without harming itself either. The best way to respond is simply to put up a strong front, increase your defenses and push forward with your military modernization. Not everything or every action requires an ill-planned response, that's how these conflict start in the first place.

According to Gazprom there are no political affairs holding up or interfering with the proposed Turkish Stream project. UPI reports in an article titled Russia: No political issues with Turkish pipeline.

*I can't post links.

Welcome back Captain Sven. Missed your posts on here. Hope the family is well.:D
 
Back
Top Bottom