What's new

‘Too upset and angry’: Muslim teen barred from top London school for wearing veil quits

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol. Not heard.crap. Yet maximum terrorism by islamic terrorists since decades.
Study: Threat of Muslim-American terrorism in U.S. exaggerated

Study: Threat of Muslim-American terrorism in U.S. exaggerated - CNN.com

(CNN) -- The terrorist threat posed by radicalized Muslim- Americans has been exaggerated, according to a study released Wednesday by researchers at Duke University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

A small number of Muslim-Americans have undergone radicalization since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the study found. It compiled a list of 139 individuals it categorized as "Muslim-American terrorism offenders" who had become radicalized in the U.S. in that time -- a rate of 17 per year.

That level is "small compared to other violent crime in America, but not insignificant," according to the study, titled "Anti-Terror Lessons of Muslim-Americans."

To be included on the list, an offender had to have been wanted, arrested, convicted or killed in connection with terrorism-related activities since 9/11 -- and have lived in the United States, regardless of immigration status, for more than a year prior to arrest.

Of the 139 offenders, fewer than a third successfully executed a violent plan, according to a Duke University statement on the study, and most of those were overseas. Read the report:"Anti-Terror Lessons of Muslim-Americans"

"Muslim-American organizations and the vast majority of individuals that we interviewed firmly reject the radical extremist ideology that justifies the use of violence to achieve political ends," David Schanzer, an associate professor in Duke's Sanford School of Public Policy and director of the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, said in the statement.

In the aftermath of 9/11, however, as well as terrorist attacks elsewhere in the world, the possible radicalization of Muslim-Americans is a "key counterterrorism concern" -- magnified by heavy publicity that accompanies the arrests of Muslim-Americans, such as that seen in the wake of the November shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, in which 13 people were killed. Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan, a Muslim born in Virginia, is charged in connection with that incident.

Other high-profile incidents include the charging of eight Somali-American men on charges related to what authorities say are efforts to recruit youths from the Minneapolis, Minnesota, area to fight for al-Shabaab, a Somali guerrilla movement battling the African country's U.N.-backed transitional government. At least two young men from Minnesota have been killed in Somalia, including one who blew himself up in what is believed to have been the first suicide bombing carried out by a naturalized U.S. citizen.

In addition, five Americans were arrested last month in Pakistan, and police have said they are confident that they were planning terrorist attacks. A Pakistani court Monday gave police two weeks to prepare their case against the five; authorities have said they plan to prosecute the youths under the country's anti-terrorism act.

But it is the Muslim-American communities themselves who play a large role in keeping the number of radicalized members low through their own practices, according to the study. Leaders and Muslim-American organizations denounce violent acts, for instance, in messages that have weight within communities.

In addition, such communities often self-police -- confronting those who express radical ideology or support for terrorism and communicating concerns about radical individuals to authorities. Some Muslim-Americans have adopted programs for youth to help identify those who react inappropriately to controversial issues so they can undergo counseling and education, the researchers said.

"Muslim-American communities have been active in preventing radicalization," said Charles Kurzman, professor of sociology at UNC, in the statement. "This is one reason that Muslim-American terrorism has resulted in fewer than three dozen of the 136,000 murders committed in the United States since 9/11."

However, "since 9/11, there has been increased tension among Muslim-Americans about their acceptance in mainstream American society," the study said. Muslim-Americans report feeling a stronger anti-Muslim bias from the media as well as from day-to-day interactions.

"While Muslim-Americans understand and support the need for enhanced security and counterterrorism initiatives, they believe that some of these efforts are discriminatory, and they are angered that innocent Muslim-Americans bear the brunt of the impact of these policies."

Steps can be taken to minimize radicalization among Muslim-Americans, the study said. The most important is encouraging political mobilization among Muslims, which helps prevent radicalization and also demonstrates to Muslims abroad "that grievances can be resolved through peaceful democratic means." Policymakers should include Muslim-Americans in their outreach efforts, and public officials should attend events at mosques, as they do churches and synagogues, the study recommended.

Also, Muslim-American communities should widely disseminate their condemnation of terrorism and violence, and those statements should be publicized, the study said. Law enforcement has a role to play as well, by making efforts to increase the level of trust and communication with such communities. This could include the cultivation of Muslim-American informants, the study suggested, a policy that could be developed and openly discussed with community leaders.

Governments can promote and encourage the building of strong Muslim-American communities and promote outreach by social services agencies, the study said. "Our research suggests that Muslim-American communities desire collaboration and outreach with the government beyond law enforcement, in areas such as public health, education and transportation."

And the Muslim-American community can promote enhanced education about its religion and beliefs, the study said. Increased civil rights enforcement can also be an important tool.

However, policies that alienate Muslims may increase the threat of homegrown terrorism rather than reducing it, the study said.

"Our research suggests that initiatives that treat Muslim-Americans as part of the solution to this problem are far more likely to be successful," said Schanzer.

Schanzer, Kurzman and Ebrahim Moosa, associate professor of religion at Duke, co-authored the study, which summarized two years of research involving interviews of more than 120 Muslims in four different communities nationwide -- Seattle, Washington; Houston, Texas; Buffalo, New York; and Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The study was funded by a grant from the Department of Justice.



..... The first available such report was for the year 2006. The data from 2006,2007, and 2008 showed that about 0.4% of terrorist attacks in the European Union were committed by Muslims–less than 1% (actually, less than half of 1%).

Today, I’d like to update our readers with new Europol data: the data for 2009 and 2010 is now available.

Once again, a minuscule percentage of terrorist attacks in Europe were committed by Muslims. In 2009 and 2010, there were a grand total of 543 terrorist attacks, of which only 4 were committed by Muslims. This means that only 0.7% of terrorist attacks–again, less than 1%–were committed by Muslims.


So I guess the theory being fed to you by your super natural brain is flawed....either put forward proof or please speak with sense not phobia!

As for that letter, its damage control.
Propagating lies is not damage control it is what it is ....instilling fear and phobia! Only a psychopath with a phobia can push in fear into other people at large scales!
 
.
Why do Muslims, if they have so much problems following laws of the country or the simple laws of school, even live in non Muslim countries? Why should everyone bend laws according to their whims and cries? Get out of this medieval mentality, we are living in modern world..
 
.
Daft and dangerous: Muslim scholar's plan for a militia to fight global jihad

So much for muslim scholars being against isis .Many of them support these thugs.
So one one mental retard from India is MANY OF THEM? nice!

.An influential theologian and author of numerous scholarly tomes in Urdu and Arabic, Nadvi is Dean of the Faculty of Shariah at Darul Uloom Nadwa, Lucknow, whose reputation as a premier institution of Islamic teaching ranks in the same class as Darul Uloom, Deoband. He is also a member of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board and Aligarh Muslim University’s court, its highest decision-making body.
 
.
Study: Threat of Muslim-American terrorism in U.S. exaggerated

Study: Threat of Muslim-American terrorism in U.S. exaggerated - CNN.com

(CNN) -- The terrorist threat posed by radicalized Muslim- Americans has been exaggerated, according to a study released Wednesday by researchers at Duke University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

A small number of Muslim-Americans have undergone radicalization since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the study found. It compiled a list of 139 individuals it categorized as "Muslim-American terrorism offenders" who had become radicalized in the U.S. in that time -- a rate of 17 per year.

That level is "small compared to other violent crime in America, but not insignificant," according to the study, titled "Anti-Terror Lessons of Muslim-Americans."

To be included on the list, an offender had to have been wanted, arrested, convicted or killed in connection with terrorism-related activities since 9/11 -- and have lived in the United States, regardless of immigration status, for more than a year prior to arrest.

Of the 139 offenders, fewer than a third successfully executed a violent plan, according to a Duke University statement on the study, and most of those were overseas. Read the report:"Anti-Terror Lessons of Muslim-Americans"

"Muslim-American organizations and the vast majority of individuals that we interviewed firmly reject the radical extremist ideology that justifies the use of violence to achieve political ends," David Schanzer, an associate professor in Duke's Sanford School of Public Policy and director of the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, said in the statement.

In the aftermath of 9/11, however, as well as terrorist attacks elsewhere in the world, the possible radicalization of Muslim-Americans is a "key counterterrorism concern" -- magnified by heavy publicity that accompanies the arrests of Muslim-Americans, such as that seen in the wake of the November shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, in which 13 people were killed. Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan, a Muslim born in Virginia, is charged in connection with that incident.

Other high-profile incidents include the charging of eight Somali-American men on charges related to what authorities say are efforts to recruit youths from the Minneapolis, Minnesota, area to fight for al-Shabaab, a Somali guerrilla movement battling the African country's U.N.-backed transitional government. At least two young men from Minnesota have been killed in Somalia, including one who blew himself up in what is believed to have been the first suicide bombing carried out by a naturalized U.S. citizen.

In addition, five Americans were arrested last month in Pakistan, and police have said they are confident that they were planning terrorist attacks. A Pakistani court Monday gave police two weeks to prepare their case against the five; authorities have said they plan to prosecute the youths under the country's anti-terrorism act.

But it is the Muslim-American communities themselves who play a large role in keeping the number of radicalized members low through their own practices, according to the study. Leaders and Muslim-American organizations denounce violent acts, for instance, in messages that have weight within communities.

In addition, such communities often self-police -- confronting those who express radical ideology or support for terrorism and communicating concerns about radical individuals to authorities. Some Muslim-Americans have adopted programs for youth to help identify those who react inappropriately to controversial issues so they can undergo counseling and education, the researchers said.

"Muslim-American communities have been active in preventing radicalization," said Charles Kurzman, professor of sociology at UNC, in the statement. "This is one reason that Muslim-American terrorism has resulted in fewer than three dozen of the 136,000 murders committed in the United States since 9/11."

However, "since 9/11, there has been increased tension among Muslim-Americans about their acceptance in mainstream American society," the study said. Muslim-Americans report feeling a stronger anti-Muslim bias from the media as well as from day-to-day interactions.

"While Muslim-Americans understand and support the need for enhanced security and counterterrorism initiatives, they believe that some of these efforts are discriminatory, and they are angered that innocent Muslim-Americans bear the brunt of the impact of these policies."

Steps can be taken to minimize radicalization among Muslim-Americans, the study said. The most important is encouraging political mobilization among Muslims, which helps prevent radicalization and also demonstrates to Muslims abroad "that grievances can be resolved through peaceful democratic means." Policymakers should include Muslim-Americans in their outreach efforts, and public officials should attend events at mosques, as they do churches and synagogues, the study recommended.

Also, Muslim-American communities should widely disseminate their condemnation of terrorism and violence, and those statements should be publicized, the study said. Law enforcement has a role to play as well, by making efforts to increase the level of trust and communication with such communities. This could include the cultivation of Muslim-American informants, the study suggested, a policy that could be developed and openly discussed with community leaders.

Governments can promote and encourage the building of strong Muslim-American communities and promote outreach by social services agencies, the study said. "Our research suggests that Muslim-American communities desire collaboration and outreach with the government beyond law enforcement, in areas such as public health, education and transportation."

And the Muslim-American community can promote enhanced education about its religion and beliefs, the study said. Increased civil rights enforcement can also be an important tool.

However, policies that alienate Muslims may increase the threat of homegrown terrorism rather than reducing it, the study said.

"Our research suggests that initiatives that treat Muslim-Americans as part of the solution to this problem are far more likely to be successful," said Schanzer.

Schanzer, Kurzman and Ebrahim Moosa, associate professor of religion at Duke, co-authored the study, which summarized two years of research involving interviews of more than 120 Muslims in four different communities nationwide -- Seattle, Washington; Houston, Texas; Buffalo, New York; and Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The study was funded by a grant from the Department of Justice.

..... The first available such report was for the year 2006. The data from 2006,2007, and 2008 showed that about 0.4% of terrorist attacks in the European Union were committed by Muslims–less than 1% (actually, less than half of 1%).

Today, I’d like to update our readers with new Europol data: the data for 2009 and 2010 is now available.

Once again, a minuscule percentage of terrorist attacks in Europe were committed by Muslims. In 2009 and 2010, there were a grand total of 543 terrorist attacks, of which only 4 were committed by Muslims. This means that only 0.7% of terrorist attacks–again, less than 1%–were committed by Muslims.

So I guess the theory being fed to you by your super natural brain is flawed....either put forward proof or please speak with sense not phobia!

Propagating lies is not damage control it is what it is ....instilling fear and phobia! Only a psychopath with a phobia can push in fear into other people at large scales!


Yet ,terrorism research website list almost all muslim nations as global sponsors of terror.
Countries that sponsor and accept terrorist presence


6 nations that are state sponsor of terror .Though now ,we can add jordan,turkey,saudi arabia,UAE,Israel ,USA to the list also.But still majority are islamic nations.

So one one mental retard from India is MANY OF THEM? nice!

And a very high level one. if high level mullahs think like this ,it is a big concern .Hence the subversive ,fifth column title.
 
.
Why do Muslims, if they have so much problems following laws of the country or the simple laws of school, even live in non Muslim countries? Why should everyone bend laws according to their whims and cries? Get out of this medieval mentality, we are living in modern world..
The girl was born and raised in UK ....

we can send your types packing home but not those who are as much British as any British can be!

Who is asking for everyone to bend their laws? They already bend it for provocative clothes being allowed...

how is that not medieval mentality to go towards cavemen dressing?

Yet ,terrorism research website list almost all muslim nations as global sponsors of terror.
Countries that sponsor and accept terrorist presence
6 nations that are state sponsor of terror .Though now ,we can add jordan,turkey,saudi arabia,UAE,Israel ,USA to the list also.But still majority are islamic nations.
Majority of Indians are Hindu so India is a Hindu nation not secular? Wow what logic!


And a very high level one. if high level mullahs think like this ,it is a big concern .
Well that is the problem in India...You people raring mental retards and throwing the blame elsewhere....
 
.


The girl was born and raised in UK ....

we can send your types packing home but not those who are as much British as any British can be!

Who is asking for everyone to bend their laws? They already bend it for provocative clothes being allowed...

how is that not medieval mentality to go towards cavemen dressing?


Majority of Indians are Hindu so India is a Hindu nation not secular? Wow what logic!



Well that is the problem in India...You people raring mental retards and throwing the blame elsewhere....

lol, if we started killing them ,then its murder, terror according to ummah ,if not then its retards according to ummah .
 
.
Wow looks like every Indian loves Anjem Ch. if forced to a corner they pick up the trash who isnt even a scholar but a self educated self proclaimed wanna be....he has no degree relating to Islam but is often called an expert on the issue...wonder why and how...and Indians just love to quote him and give him the attention he is crying for and the clicks on his videos that he can show off he is famous :rolleyes:

lol, if we started killing them ,then its murder, terror according to ummah ,if not then its retards according to ummah .
Well, there are other measures to control them like send them to jail instead of interviewing them and asking for their bigoted opinion and then going amok with it...
 
. .
That maybe true....but are you an expert to deduce that? Can you bring me proof that it is not something god wants? coz I can go to a website and pick quotes to counter those ....

Assumptions dont mean a thing to me....I would never paint EVERYONE with the same "assumption"



That is fine...
I can give you both arguments for and countering this particular practice..and in the end it is based on what the person prefers...



Not really....it is listed in Hadith....but I do agree it is not a fundamental part of faith it is a part which is a choice to be better and also because a girl literally has to swallow her pride to cover her beauty (it is nature of women to want to be appreciated) hence it is sort of a humility exercise or also can be considered a challenge to humble one's self...

I do agree those who force it on women should get their mentality checked and also their hormone levels...just coz they cant control themselves gives them no rights to impose something on women to help stop the over production of THEIR hormones...



Like I said that may be true and I gave both POV

I am not generalizing, I am saying some. Never said all.
 
.
She has left the school. She didn't adhere to the dress code, tough! It was her choice.

What I don't understand is that according to these women the face veil is meant to draw attention away from the woman, but wearing it in a Western country such as the UK you attract nothing but cold hard stares, negative glances and comments. It is actually easier not to wear it.

wouldn't a headscarf be more appropriate?
 
. . . .
wouldn't a headscarf be more appropriate?
Yes...but there are other sects too....some actually think that the niqab is obligatory coz men cant control themselves so women have to protect themselves (I myself have read 2 of these sects up out of curiosity and practiced the niqab also out of curiosity)
 
.
isn't that bit of an exaggeration :/

No, this is not a medieval society we live in. Head scarf is fine, but no premier institution should entertain face veil. The sole purpose of mass surveillance in British streets will be lost.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom