What's new

This was how they got the figures of One million Uyghurs Incarceration in China?

Ever heard of anecdotal evidences? You can post as many tik tok videos about someone's grandma being a liar but it still doesn't change the fact on the ground. That even the international community are calling concern on China's treatment of the uighur.
You can have you "own" facts, but nothing changes what's happening on the ground. if Xinjiang has a large portion of its population being locked up and implemented persecution policies, the region can never develop this fast. The great peace and prosperity Xinjiang achieved in very recent years is self explanatory for its policies.
 
.
Wow with that logic that means nothing else matters. So therefore why don't you just kill yourself & be done with it then. After all human life are subject to interpretation?

You now see why people need to call someone else's bullshit. Otherwise people will start questioning whether or not rat poison can actually kill people.
We interpret facts based on our worldview. You can believe in your opinions are "facts". At the same time, I can also believe you're peddling bullshit. Now here are some facts, subjected to whether you believe them or not.

- Uyghur population increased from 3.6 million in 1953 to 12 million in 2017 (Or is it fake Chinese census?)
- There has not been a single terrorist attack in Xinjiang since 2016. (Or is it fake Chinese crime statistics?)

Now go jump off a rooftop while you ponder about reality.
 
.
You can have you "own" facts, but nothing changes what's happening on the ground. if Xinjiang has a large portion of its population being locked up and implemented persecution policies, the region can never develop this fast. The great peace and prosperity Xinjiang achieved in very recent years is self explanatory for its policies.
Ever heard of manifest destiny?
 
.
Ever heard of anecdotal evidences? You can post as many tik tok videos about someone's grandma being a liar but it still doesn't change the fact on the ground. That even the international community are calling concern on China's treatment of the uighur.

Indonesia is an actual genocidal nation with multiple anti-Chinese holocausts. Nobody has ever accused China of doing to Uighurs what Indonesia actually did in history to Chinese Indonesians. Chinese Indonesians are subject to cultural genocide by being forbidden to learn Chinese characters and have Chinese names.

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Your reckoning approaches.
 
.
We interpret facts based on our worldview. You can believe in your opinions are "facts". At the same time, I can also believe you're peddling bullshit. Now here are some facts, subjected to whether you believe them or not.

- Uyghur population increased from 3.6 million in 1953 to 12 million in 2017 (Or is it fake Chinese census?)
- There has not been a single terrorist attack in Xinjiang since 2016. (Or is it fake Chinese crime statistics?)

Now go jump off a rooftop while you ponder about reality. Or slit your wrist, whichever is the halal way.

Jesus are you this dense?

A population increasing doesn't mean they are treated well. Just look at how African-Americans populations increase before emancipation. I like how your entire argument are lynched at "we at least letting them breed." Like somehow doing the bare minimum of human rights is an accomplishment.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1010169/black-and-slave-population-us-1790-1880/
 
. .
Indonesia is an actual genocidal nation with multiple anti-Chinese holocausts. Nobody has ever accused China of doing to Uighurs what Indonesia actually did in history to Chinese Indonesians. Chinese Indonesians are subject to cultural genocide by being forbidden to learn Chinese characters and have Chinese names.

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Your reckoning approaches.
Who cares about chinese-indonesian they ain't people them still subject to interpretation dontcha know? Thx to the guy above for basically giving everybody a free pass to do whatever because morality doesn't exist apparently.
 
. .
You anti-Chinese elements are really ugly and disgusting.

打印机一台,核平发展的工具,随时可以赠送给东南亚某国

proxy-image
 
. . .
Jesus are you this dense?

A population increasing doesn't mean they are treated well. Just look at how African-Americans populations increase before emancipation. I like how your entire argument are lynched at "we at least letting them breed." Like somehow doing the bare minimum of human rights is an accomplishment.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1010169/black-and-slave-population-us-1790-1880/
So now you don't dispute Chinese census data? What about this supposed "genocide" that's happening? How did China fail so hard at genocide that Uyghur population quadrupled in the span of six decades? You know the whole purpose of genocide is to wipe out a particular religious or ethnic group right?

Is the region growing economically? Yes.
Have terrorist attacks stopped? Yes.
Are Uyghurs finally learning Mandarin and marketable job skills? Yes.

Then I'm perfectly fine with the current policy. For one thing, most thieves in Guangzhou's train station disappeared when I went back to China last year. A decade ago, it used to be filled with Uyghurs gangs and people avoided them like plagues. Now I actually see them running legitimate businesses and holding reputable jobs. Of course, that's my subjective experience so I can't say it's a fact across China.

You jumped off a roof yet?
 
.
So now you don't dispute Chinese census data? What about this supposed "genocide" that's happening? How did China fail so hard at genocide that Uyghur population quadrupled in the span of six decades? You know the whole purpose of genocide is to wipe out a particular religious or ethnic group right?

Is the region growing economically? Yes.
Have terrorist attacks stopped? Yes.
Are Uyghurs finally learning Mandarin and marketable job skills? Yes.

Then I'm perfectly fine with the current policy. For one thing, most thieves in Guangzhou's train station disappeared when I went back to China last year. A decade ago, it used to be filled with Uyghurs gangs and people avoided them like plagues. Now I actually see them running legitimate businesses and holding reputable jobs. Of course, that's my subjective experience so I can't say it's a fact across China.

You jumped off a roof yet?
Look up the definition of genocide you would be surprised that mass culling are just one aspect of it.

Also oppressing people on the basis of economic progress are very capitalistic thinking don't u know. What would uncle Mao say to that I wonder? Also I thought the only thing that matters are math & physic not economic.

ZENZ: I have long argued that the atrocity in the region is a cultural genocide, not a literal genocide. I do continue to believe that, generally speaking, the Chinese government does not intend to physically eradicate the Uighurs and Kazakhs, just to integrate, subjugate, dominate and assimilate them. However, this is coupled with a policy of ethnoracial domination, as the government has brought millions of Han Chinese settler in the regions with promises of high salaries, jobs and free housing.

The reason why now this has changed - we do need to probably call it a genocide - is quite simply because the evidence now, for the first time, very specifically meets one of the five criteria set forth by the United Nations Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide from 1948, which specifically says the suppression of birth.


BTW this is from your government source:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/01/china-documents-uighur-genocidal-sterilization-xinjiang/

If the uighur are the majority & did half the things you people did to them you will not be saying this to be a good thing.
 
.
Look up the definition of genocide you would be surprised that mass culling are just one aspect of it.

Also oppressing people on the basis of economic progress are very capitalistic thinking don't u know. What would uncle Mao say to that I wonder?

ZENZ: I have long argued that the atrocity in the region is a cultural genocide, not a literal genocide. I do continue to believe that, generally speaking, the Chinese government does not intend to physically eradicate the Uighurs and Kazakhs, just to integrate, subjugate, dominate and assimilate them. However, this is coupled with a policy of ethnoracial domination, as the government has brought millions of Han Chinese settler in the regions with promises of high salaries, jobs and free housing.

The reason why now this has changed - we do need to probably call it a genocide - is quite simply because the evidence now, for the first time, very specifically meets one of the five criteria set forth by the United Nations Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide from 1948, which specifically says the suppression of birth.


BTW this is from your government source:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/01/china-documents-uighur-genocidal-sterilization-xinjiang/

If the uighur are the majority & did half the things you people did to them you will not be saying this to be a good thing.
Assimilation was precisely why China preserved its civilization through the ages. It's while we have large and centralized dynasties in history rather than squabbling city-states like the Greeks. It is also the reason we can rise time and time again after turmoil, while other ancient civilizations disappear into history. In fact, China grown from a patch of land on the banks of Yellow River into what it is today largely through cultural assimilation. My father's side of the family is Manchurian, but we've fully taken up Han culture. I believe in "夷狄而华夏者,则华夏之;华夏而夷狄者,则夷狄之". Since you claim to be Chinese, I'm sure you don't need Google translate to help you with that. If you're trying to convince me assimilating the Uyghurs culturally is a bad thing, you're barking up the wrong tree.

You assumed I liked CCP or Mao. For the record, I like capitalism and I think Mao is a failure at administering the country. He was a good at gaining power, but a giant mess once he actually gets it.

The suppression of birth thing is just funny. From 1970's onward, One Child Policy had been imposed on Han population. You don't call that genocide. Now you get your panties in a bunch because Uyghurs are no longer exempt. For once, I am glad CCP decided to apply their policies equally. If we continue the current policy in Xinjiang, we won't have to worry about ethnic problems in two decades.
 
.
for the first time, very specifically meets one of the five criteria set forth by the United Nations Convention for the Punishment and Prevention of the Crime of Genocide from 1948, which specifically says the suppression of birth.
.
Do you mean China has been genociding Han Chinese for 4 decades already?

Most police officers and soldiers in Xinjiang are Uighurs themselve, they are heavily armed with all kinds of weapons, If China persecuted them, why not even one Uighur officer or solider fights back and turn their weapons against the government??
 
.
Back
Top Bottom