What's new

The only mystery I failed in.....Plz help

My sentiments are irrelevant. You are posting rubbish about the Hindu beliefs and that shows lack of respect.

You are covering up your ignorance with half baked theories built on generous assumptions and faulty logic. Then you are spreading that ignorance thus further disrespecting the beliefs.

You can very well have told him you do not know the real reason rather then invent your own version of Hinduism.


When I post something, I know about it.

What you posted is crap straight from books .. hinduism is neither a religion nor a fixed quantifiable religion. If it is, you will be hard pressed to reconcile the Aghoris in the overall picture as described by you. Or even Draupadi in the overall picture of Hinduism.

Namaz was offered towards Jerusalem, then shifted to Mecca. Everything has a rationale. A practicality to it.

Intellectualization will not render you in a position wherein you earn appreciation for basing your statement on your perception of things.

So, again, do not quote me to post crap. Not here to speak religion. Unfortunately for you, neither do you know the background of the interaction nor do I care to elaborate it for you.

If you feel unable to resist the temptation to quote me and post crap, be my guest. This is my last communication with you on the subject.
 
.
When I post something, I know about it.

Yet the evidence says otherwise.

What you posted is crap straight from books .. hinduism is neither a religion nor a fixed quantifiable religion. If it is, you will be hard pressed to reconcile the Aghoris in the overall picture as described by you. Or even Draupadi in the overall picture of Hinduism.

I will not be hard pressed because I know the facts, you are hard pressed because you do not know, only guess. Hinduism flows from its scriptures and practices, not from fantasy and taxed imagination of an arrogant mind.

Aghori's practice hatha yoga and one of the methods of shorting the Yama, Niyama principles is to force your mind into extremes. That is why they practice extreme form of perversion to strengthen the mind.

They are sanyasis who have renounced the world and are seeking Samadhi and an end to the cycle of rebirth. They risk all to walk that path, go to a point of no return.

Similarly there is no contradiction in Draupadi in Hinduism since morality in Hinduism does not stem from Christian morality. It stems from Dharma.


Namaz was offered towards Jerusalem, then shifted to Mecca. Everything has a rationale. A practicality to it.

Intellectualization will not render you in a position wherein you earn appreciation for basing your statement on your perception of things.

And yet you have explained the reasons muslim bury the dead wrongly. If practicality was the foundation then the shortage of land in burial grounds would have eliminated burials by now :lol:

Did you know that old bodies are dug out of the limited ground available while fresh graves are prepared ?

Muslims bury their dead because the christians bury their dead. Did the pharos of Egypt had any shortage of firewood ? Why did they build the prymid and got buried under that ? Why did they preserve their organs ? The arabs have just borrowed that tradition.

The real reasons is the belief that they will wake up from the dead and THAT is what drives practices today.

The christians and muslims believe that their bodies will be restored back to full health on the day of 'qayamat' or 'end of the world' and they will wake up from the graves and face 'god'. The same way 'jesus' woke up from the dead.

So, again, do not quote me to post crap. Not here to speak religion. Unfortunately for you, neither do you know the background of the interaction nor do I care to elaborate it for you.

If you feel unable to resist the temptation to quote me and post crap, be my guest. This is my last communication with you on the subject.

I do not care about any of the 'background', it not my concern. If you are not going to post rubbish on Hinduism then I have no reason to trash you posts.
 
.


You never add up the running balance column. It's already an adjusted "as of position".

That is why the lower salaried class is taxed more in Pakistan. :D

That's not correct.
 
.
You are trying to create and solve a wrong equation. Total of remainder balance has no relation to total of actual amount. if you spend 15 again instead of 9, your balance total would come to 45? There is no solution to a wrong question, and bold part is your answer.


 
.
Bro i wont go through all the posts as i am sick and tired of trying to explain this stupid problem and even more to see people making such basic mistake that makes this a "problem" to begin with :lol:

So i hope you have already been explained about this but if it is not i will do it for you. It is very simple, YOU CANNOT ADD the balance amount and expect it to be the same as total. It is the BALANCE about. You can add the amount sepnt and that will be equal to total not the balance.

To explain by example, consider having these 50 $ and then spend one each day. You will be left with balance of 49, 48, 47, 46 and so on!! No if you add these balances see what you get :P

Understand?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom