Marwari
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 432
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
u just admitted operation shudi karan 1984 took place...which your fellow indians are denying
Can't claim something without proof......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
u just admitted operation shudi karan 1984 took place...which your fellow indians are denying
Also, it is not possible for the Pakistani Army to kill 3 million people in 10 months with 350,000 troops against India's 500,000 troops & 100,000 Mukti Bahinis during the war. If Pakistan managed to kill 3 million people in 10 months with 350,000 troops, how many Kashmiris would have 700,000 Indian troops killed from 1947 to 2011? They would have probably wiped off the whole population, not just the Kashmiris, if you apply the same kill rate for the Indian Army that you did for the Pakistani Army in 1971.
The US has killed 1 million Iraqis since 2003. If the US managed to kill 1 million people in 8 years, how did the Pakistani Army of 350,000 troops manage to kill 3 million people, that too against 500,000 Indian troops & 100,000 Mukti Bahini? You are clearly delusional, at a point of no getting back.
No independent UN investigation has ever been done to verify the 3 million figure. No Pakistani Army official or the Pakistani Army has been charged with war crimes in the international court of justice. If the UN reported human rights violations in Sri Lanka despite Sri Lanka not letting them into their country, why didn't the UN or any independent organization ever verify these figures?
Also, it is not possible for the Pakistani Army to kill 3 million people in 10 months with 350,000 troops against India's 500,000 troops & 100,000 Mukti Bahinis during the war. If Pakistan managed to kill 3 million people in 10 months with 350,000 troops, how many Kashmiris would have 700,000 Indian troops killed from 1947 to 2011? They would have probably wiped off the whole population, not just the Kashmiris, if you apply the same kill rate for the Indian Army that you did for the Pakistani Army in 1971.
The US has killed 1 million Iraqis since 2003. If the US managed to kill 1 million people in 8 years, how did the Pakistani Army of 350,000 troops manage to kill 3 million people, that too against 500,000 Indian troops & 100,000 Mukti Bahini? You are clearly delusional, at a point of no getting back.
What I understand from all these discussion, the change of name is basically because of identity politics, the same reason calcutta became kolkata or bombay became mumbai.
Renaming may not bring anything substantial, but it will certainly make sikhs feel good, at least those who are demanding.
If enough sikhs demand it, I am sure separate line could be added to constitution to make it more clear. I definitely support it.
Its just the name actually, and the constitutional recognition that comes with it. You see, the demand has much deeper roots. If you were to analyze the Sikh psychic, its very fearful for the loss of identity (ill-founded you might say). After all, the community have fought wars and lost lives (right uptill the modern age), so there seems to be an ever present danger to its existence. It is this psychic that is affected by the lack of a Sikh-marriage act.
Our festivities and religious processions that include a display of martial prowess (you must have seen pics of warrior Nihang Sikhs practicing martial arts during processions) alludes in a way to this very sentiment of fight against the dangers to the religion. I might be reading too much into it, but its just my psycho-analysis as a Sikh.
I would say you do not understand it yet. Please read my reply to Kartik below -
Assuming the kill rate of different wars and situations to be the same, particularly of genocides is as logical as you get. You calling others delusional is a compliment.
And you yourself claimed 1 million biharis killed by 100 thousand mukti bahini sometime back on the same thread.
Delusional, you bet.
Mukti Bahini started killing Biharis a long time before the 1971 war.
The Blood telegrams are enough proof of the genocide. No need to break your sweat.Or should I post the Blood Telegrams again here where it was describes as a gruesome genocide of Bengalis ?
proof of this stupid claim
Please dnt put Rupee news type article
The proof of this is 'Dead Reckoning' by Sarmila Bose. Read it.
If the Blood Telegrams are enough proof of a genocide, why isn't the Pakistani Army or any of the accused Pakistani Army Officials at the time tried & convicted of war crimes? Why hasn't the UN verified that 3 million Bengalis had been killed? Most of the telegrams were fabrications by India & Bangladesh post December 1971, showing the pictures of dead Biharis as Bengalis.
The proof of this is 'Dead Reckoning' by Sarmila Bose. Read it.
their are thousand of proof that verify that your army kill thousand of Bengali and rape them but i think that's all propaganda and a article is more credible cause its against India ??????????
and its for you
Bangladesh Demands Apology from Pakistan for 1971 Atrocities |
There is a difference between thousands & millions killed. No one verified a 3 million figure.
---------- Post added at 06:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:13 PM ----------
Come up with all the excuses you want, no one verified a 3 million figure.
Come up with all the excuses you want, no one verified a 3 million figure.