A.P. Richelieu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 7,724
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
All these uprisings started after continuous propaganda by some western govts.
Syrian crises started as a result of many western govts creating isis. This is similar to Afghanistan crises when terrorists were trained to destroy ussr. Till now Pakistan is facing the heat as many refugees from Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan flooded Pakistan. Not to mention terrorism Pakistan faced from 2007 to 2014 and still few incidents. At minimal Pakistan lost 123Billion $ and almost 90,000 lives. All for some western ungrateful govts who now miss no chance to accuse Pakistan. What did Pakistan got in return of help? Pakistan has learned it's lesson the hard way.
The refugees from Syria doesn't want to go to Eastern Europe but to the Western one, East is as poor as Middle East but it is in the way.
It is easier to blame Muslims, but do you blame those govts who destroyed their countries and created terrorists?
There is more killings because some western govts are creating troubles. When some fascists in the west doesn't like the govt, they try to create proxy groups who are supplied weapons and trained to fight govt forces. They later become terrorists once the objectives of destruction is acheived.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/trump-ends-regime-change-war-in-syria-passes-the-bill-to-saudi-arabia-big-blow-to-mic.573420/
ISIS was created by Sunni extremists, which recruited all over the world,
with the majority of the recruit coming from Arab countries.
Maybe one third of the recruits came from MUSLIM communities in Europe.
ISIS declared themself to be the Caliphate in 2014, and the Syrian uprising started in 2011.
It is 100% a Muslim creation, even if most of the recruits are losers, drug addicts and criminals.
You are engaging in the typical whining approach of blaiming the West for all the misdeeds by Muslims. Each Muslim is responsible for his own deeds, noone else.
In Afghanistan, the US trained the Afghanis which fought the USSR.
After the war was won, the US left, a government was set up by the Mujahedin, but
quickly went south due to internal strife, with Gülbuddin Hekmyatar revolting against the government, besieging Kabul.
That became a stalemate, until the Taliban, armed and funded by PAKISTAN (according to Benazir Bhutto) overran the country. The Taliban proved to be uncontrollable, and invited Al Qaeda.
Pakistan and KSA warned the Taliban about this, but they did not listen.
Some former Mujahedin certainly joined the Taliban, but it is essentially a Pakistani creation turned raving monster. Many Pakistanis on PDF are certainly happy about every perceived success of the Talibans, and several has claimed that Pakistan has defeated NATO.
This has been discussed several times on PDF, so you can easily find the sources.
Basically Pakistan made their own bed, and is now forced to lie in it.
After 9/11, Bush forced Pakistan to do lip-service, fearing an attack by the US.
Pakistan certainly has to be dragged into any activity against the Taliban from the US point of view. Only when the Taliban started to attack also targets within Pakistan, real activities started.
The Syrian Uprising started because of the Arab Spring.
The Arabs are living in countries run by dictators.
Due to globalisation, Arabs are exposed to DEMOCRACY in media.
They can see for themselves how it works.
A significant part of the Arab world want the same. Are You blaiming them?
The Arab Spring succeeded in overthrowing the dictators in Tunisia, and in Egypt.
In Egypt they then elected Morsi, who totally failed to understand democracy.
He did not realize that a true democrat refuses to rule a country, unless he feels the popular support. After one year, the Egyptians had enough and got rid of him.
The endresult is not a big difference from the days of Mubarak.
The West including USA complained about how this was handled, after which relations between the US and Egypt went sour.
In Libya and Syria, the dictators started killing their citizens.
In Libya, NATO intervened due to pressure from the public.
The former dictator/rapist was killed by his own after capture.
Syria was considered a hopeless case from start. NATO did not intervene,
because Russia has vetoed all actions against Assad in the UNSC.
If NATO had wanted to overthrow Assad, you would have noticed.
KSA and Turkey tried and failed, but since they are Muslim,
you refuse to give them credit.