But they are working with RR.@mete bro you know this stuff. Tr motor claims they will turn on engine 2026. İs this possible? Does ts1400 engine give us that much experience?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But they are working with RR.@mete bro you know this stuff. Tr motor claims they will turn on engine 2026. İs this possible? Does ts1400 engine give us that much experience?
Bro; I do not know the details of any type of progress which definetly would not be public. It is possible that some firms and/or military might be working on materials for a time without our knowlage. We might have some material knowlage with cooperation/industrial spying etc.. This is another possibility. I can easily say that we have some turbine knowlage for sure but a fighter engine in 7 years? With RR support a working prototype is possible. I do not think the same for serial production. Even just tests for complicated projects like engines takes significant time.@mete bro you know this stuff. Tr motor claims they will turn on engine 2026. İs this possible? Does ts1400 engine give us that much experience?
thanks broBro; I do not know the details of any type of progress which definetly would not be public. It is possible that some firms and/or military might be working on materials for a time without our knowlage. We might have some material knowlage with cooperation/industrial spying etc.. This is another possibility. I can easily say that we have some turbine knowlage for sure but a fighter engine in 7 years? With RR support a working prototype is possible. I do not think the same for serial production. Even just tests for complicated projects like engines takes significant time.
Efforts of Kale and TEI on turbines is important. Those are basicly same engines but only on principles. Yes; you use some material and production calulations and technologies roughly but fighter engines are in other class. It is like asking a company which only builds light and slow cars if they can produce a high class supercar like lamborghini. Roughly same principles, same parts etc. Producing other types of turbines definetly makes your companies familiar to turbine production and makes your country ready for next steps.
RR cooperation gives me hope. I think they are telling the first tests of a prototype of their calender for pr purposes. We are familiar with calender problems on other complicated projects of both Turkey and other countries' past experiences. I think a few years of dwlay is acceptable as soon as we end up with a good engine.
Note: Extend of RR support is another question.
without their help I think this project would take too long to be ready. But even with RR help 6 years sounds short amount of time.But they are working with RR.
But as i recall, Turkey scrapped the delta and single engine TF-X for a simple F-22 look alike dual engine TF-X design.
This doesn’t fit the equation !!!
After the final case of the JSF project, things are about to get complicated. Who knows, maybe Turkey will also evaluate to involved in Pakistan's AZM project, in addition to MMU(aka TFX) project . So far we're talked about the opposite possibility.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/project-azm-stealth-ambition-project.522011/page-66#post-11878451Ok guys, and @dBSPL as well.
Could you guys summarize me the progress of TF-X, what stage it is at currently, Is design shortlisted yet out of the 3 concepts
- delta
- fixed dual
- fixed single
Last i recall, dual was selected while others were scrapped (or not?) ?
And what happened to the talks of Turkish indigenous turbofan and RR collaboration in that ?
Dear Friends we will must make a this hürjet with 19200 nato standart and licenced version of rd-33 kid engine and +2 light pylon for aselpod and spews pod and with helmet mounted display (oficcial he will have) , aesa radar who used on F-16 ÖZGÜR Project (unofficall), and all national weapons usable with aselpod and spews pod.
Why
Because Hürjet not very important for us because we r&d 5 th. gen stealth fighter and stealth ucavs but a aircraft cost around 25-30 m euro with have aesa, bvr air to air, anti ship and cruise missile capability also long range hgk, kgk capability with 19200 ib thrust (more than jas-39A Gripen) will be great for most of Third world countries. And thrust me most of them still use alpha jet, hawk's like hürjet his own times.
I think we are more be luck in this market. We must do it for export without we use him.
İf he have ej-200 and aesa radar he will better than f-16 block-30, jf-17, gripen a/b (with volvo engine version not ng).I see the drawing of hurjet from top view look like F-5 Tiger, and I think hurjet have same (or better) capability with F-5 but with better technology
Also noted, that Iran develop some fighter from old F-5 platform.
Maybe this hurjet, best for counter Iranian old F-5
IMHO
Interesting image, but the TFX thread is surely wrong!