Awesome
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,023
- Reaction score
- 5
I think such comments like "They can never be Muslims" helps embarrass these groups and their popularity amongst locals dwindles when they SEE them acting against Islam and blowing up Islamic buildings. Otherwise Shias and Sunnis have targeted each other's mosques for a long time. However no indication yet of any sectarianism over here.Denial, a river in Egypt?? You decide
Editorial: Jamrud attack: read the message!
A mosque housing nearly 300 people who were saying their Friday prayers was attacked by a suicide-bomber, killing 70 and crippling 125. The reaction of the political agent of Khyber was that the attackers could not be Muslims because Muslims would never attack a mosque and that a Muslim would never spill the blood of a Muslim, especially when he was saying his namaz. This statement flies against the worldwide evidence of Muslims at sectarian and national war with and against each other in many different places and at different times in history. Most regrettably, the conclusion thereafter drawn by some TV anchors was that a foreign non-Muslim power had staged the attack to destabilise Pakistan. Of course, one can only read India into this allegation, which is not very original.
The political agent said something else of interest without making the necessary connections himself, possibly for reasons of simplicity of mind or just fear. He said the attack came because the mosque was next to the checkpost of Baghiari and that among the people killed were many khasadars, or local levies, standing guard at the checkpost, a number of whom had been killed in the attack while praying. Later, a government official, who was less opaque about what had happened, clearly accused the Taliban of having done the job in retaliation against a recent operation by the khasadars and other security personnel targeting a militant group in Khyber that owed allegiance to Baitullah Mehsud, the self-proclaimed leader of the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan.
When Pakistanis say that Muslims cant do this or that in or out of Pakistan, they are being hypocritical. There are all sorts of Muslims, moderates and extremists, Sufis and Wahabis, and so on. The fact also is that some sorts of Muslims have been killing other sorts of Muslims from Algeria to Iraq to Afghanistan and Pakistan for the past two decades. They dynamite sacred mausoleums, they blow up mosques and routinely kill other Muslims in the act of praying. What is happening in Pakistan today is serious violence against the state of Pakistan by local warlords who are affiliated with the Taliban who in turn are linked up with Al Qaeda. We may have weak resolve to take on the enemy but there is no validity in the assertion that we dont know who is killing us.
I do think the grunt involved in the suicide attack WAS associated with these terrorists groups of ours. But going after them is like trimming the branches of a bad fruit tree. The next few batches would still be bad. You need to chop it off from the roots.
I don't think its the CIA or something like that.
1) They don't gain a tactical advantage.
2) If we do buy the theory that they are working to reduce Pakistan to that map they once made, then this doesn't really help their resolve as it has sort of united the people of Pakistan.
India on the other hand just wants to keep Pakistan boiling. The best situation for India is not a stable Pakistan, nor a collapsed one. They need a Pakistan that is always simmering. The mosque was a Jamia mosque of an obscure border town. There were much bigger targets in Pakistan where the security just isn't any better. It fits.
Its a border town. Meaning there would be an Indian terrorist camp near by.