What's new

Taimur: Pakistan's ICBM?

David Ben Gurion, the first Israeli Prime Minister. His words, as printed in the Jewish Chronicle, 9 August 1967, leave nothing to imagination:

"The world Zionist movement should not be neglectful of the dangers of Pakistan to it. And Pakistan now should be its first target, for this ideological State is a threat to our existence. And Pakistan, the whole of it, hates the Jews and loves the Arabs.

"This lover of the Arabs is more dangerous to us than the Arabs themselves. For that matter, it is most essential for the world Zionism that it should now take immediate steps against Pakistan.

"Whereas the inhabitants of the Indian peninsula are Hindus whose hearts have been full of hatred towards Muslims, therefore, India is the most important base for us to work therefrom against Pakistan.

"It is essential that we exploit this base and strike and crush Pakistanis, enemies of Jews and Zionism, by all disguised and secret plans. ____:sniper:

As far as I know,
These awere the words:
"The world zionist movement should not be neglectful of the dangers of Pakistan to it. Whereas the inhibitants of India are Hindus whose heart have been full of hatred towards Muslims...Therefore India is the most important base to work from.It is essential for us to crunch Pakistan by all disguise and means"

David Ben
Jewish Chronicles
9/8/1967


I guess these things are still going on.
Is this why Indo-Israel ties are maintained strong?
 
Last edited:
.
David Ben Gurion, the first Israeli Prime Minister. His words, as printed in the Jewish Chronicle, 9 August 1967, leave nothing to imagination:

"The world Zionist movement should not be neglectful of the dangers of Pakistan to it. And Pakistan now should be its first target, for this ideological State is a threat to our existence. And Pakistan, the whole of it, hates the Jews and loves the Arabs.

"This lover of the Arabs is more dangerous to us than the Arabs themselves. For that matter, it is most essential for the world Zionism that it should now take immediate steps against Pakistan.

"Whereas the inhabitants of the Indian peninsula are Hindus whose hearts have been full of hatred towards Muslims, therefore, India is the most important base for us to work therefrom against Pakistan.

"It is essential that we exploit this base and strike and crush Pakistanis, enemies of Jews and Zionism, by all disguised and secret plans. ____:sniper:

1) 1967, this is 2010 mate.
2) Credible source please.
 
.
As far as I know,
These awere the words:
"The world zionist movement should not be neglectful of the dangers of Pakistan to it. Whereas the inhibitants of India are Hindus whose heart have been full of hatred towards Muslims...Therefore India is the most important base to work from.It is essential for us to crunch Pakistan by all disguise and means"

David Ben
Jewish Chronicles
9/8/1967


I guess these things are still going on.
Is this why Indo-Israel ties are maintained strong?

Indo-Israel ties are "maintained strong" because both India and Israel have much to gain from each other.

In the case of India: Hi-tech military equipment at reasonable prices.
In the case of Israel: Access to India's space programme.
 
.
@ DELETEDUSER

oh stop being a ponce
the poster was only saying what David Ben Gurion
 
. .
okay guys, heres another one, i have copied it from another blog.... the newspaper is more authentic (buissness recorder)

An ICBM with 7,000-km range on its way?
ISHFAQULLAH SHAWL
ISLAMABAD (August 13 2009): Pakistan is contemplating developing an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) with a 7,000 km range to make the country's defence impregnable and strengthen the armed forces of the country against any offence. The plan was evolved after successful test fire of Agni IV, the Indian ICBM system with a target range of 6000 km, which caused an imbalance of power in South Asia, extremely well informed defence sources told Business Recorder here on Wednesday.

Sources maintained that preparations are underway for the development of this long range ballistic missile and very soon it would be test fired. It would have the capacity to carry conventional and nuclear war heads. This missile, if successfully test fired, will be a milestone in the history of the country and a major achievement of scientists and engineers of Pakistan.

The possession of this ICBM not only will make Pakistan's defence impregnable but will also help create a balance of power in the region, which defence analysts believe was disturbed by the Indian test firing of Agni IV missile with a range of 6000 kilometres.

This scribe contacted high officials of the Defence Ministry who claimed ignorance of this development and refused to comment on this matter. The Director General of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), when contacted by this scribe also said that he was not aware of the development of the ICBM with a range of 7000 kilometre. It is pertinent to note that India recently test fired the 6000-kilometer Agni IV Missile with a capacity to hit and destroy targets deep in China.



but, there is a flaw, the following online link is no more active :(

Business Recorder [Pakistan's First Financial Daily]

you can also check out this thread which has refered to aaj.tv, but again the page is no more there.

An ICBM with 7,000-km range on its way? - Pakistan Talk Forums

there is definitely something brewing :)

brecorder is much better than mushy website daily.pk. :)
 
.
i think a missile shield is more of a necessity rather than an ICBM!!! after all who are we trying to target with an ICBM? the bloody americans? our enemy is our neighbor!! let's just keep it simple!!

You mean something like this?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . . .
Inspite of having 1500 km range missiles , Why Pakistan is very behind in launching satellites.
India to launch 30 communication satellites in a decade that means, every year 3 satellites.

because the government never arranged funds for space program. They are least interested in competing with other nations when it comes to space and satellite launching.

Only recently they started allocating some funds to SUPARCO and finally we are witnessing some movement in this field too. Its still too low comparing to other nations
 
.
No, he means something that will actually work against enemy missiles.

Yeah, that's right because evil hindus obviously cannot possibly invent something that works!

India announced in January 2008 that it has developed a two-layered ballistic missile defence (BMD) system to counter enemy missiles. The system, comprising 'exo' and 'endo' atmospheric interceptors, destroys incoming ballistic missiles at altitudes above 40km and below 25km, respectively.
This followed a surprise announcement by the Indian Ministry of Defence in November 2006 that it had successfully destroyed a simulated incoming enemy ballistic missile while it was 78km above the Bay of Bengal, still outside the earth's atmosphere, which was greeted with scepticism.

Most analysts did not believe that India's missile defence programme was that far advanced.

However, another 'exo-atmospheric' interception was successfully completed in November 2007, and a further trial demonstrating the interception of a live ballistic missile was held in December last year. It now seems clear that India does indeed have the military capabilities to join an elite club of countries – the US, Russia and Israel – that have the technology to destroy incoming missiles.


EDIT: Think of it what you will, however the message is clear: While Pakistan spends it's time trying to nuke India, India spends it's time trying not to get nuked. Speaks volumes of who the aggressor is here.

This will be my last post here to avoid being accused of off-topic posts. I might as well stop here. And I'm sure you'll get a lot of thanks for that clever line of yours.
 
Last edited:
.
Inspite of having 1500 km range missiles , Why Pakistan is very behind in launching satellites.
India to launch 30 communication satellites in a decade that means, every year 3 satellites.
Priorities. Every country has their own. Your life may revolve around the capabilities of Pakistan and China, but ours obviously doesn't.

Pakistan's geopolitical position makes it more important for us to develop an ICBM than an SLV, hence that is the first choice. Also, Pakistan has always focused on an incremental model, whereas India seems to focus on a spiral model of development. These are project engineering terms, you should Google them.
Yeah, that's right because evil hindus obviously cannot possibly invent something that works!
Umm... Before this fit, you should have gone and researched the capabilities of the AAD and the PAD vis-a-vis Pakistan's missiles. Neither one of these will help against Pakistan's top-notch ballistic missiles (Shaheen and Ghauri), and China's missiles will be launched from beyond the detection range, so what, then, is the purpose of these systems? I mean, all you've got is upgraded Israeli tech built to counter Iraqi and Iranian ballistic programs.
 
. .
I mean, all you've got is upgraded Israeli tech built to counter Iraqi and Iranian ballistic programs.
Being a moderator we expect you to post some sensible posts so that we could learn from you. Posting baseless stuff just for the purpose of argument is of no worth. How have you come to a conclusion that AAD and PAD are upgraded Israeli systems? Atleast spare India on this issue..Indian efforts are Indigenous and if you dont agree...i'd expect you to provide a source.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom