Banglar Lathial
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,583
- Reaction score
- 1
It's clear that you have mental problems with Turkey but its also clear that you have no idea about what sarcasm stands for. I'm sure you are stupid enough to understand what I will say, but I'll try to explain;
If you want to sell arms to any other nations, first you must develop something. If you want to develop something, you must conduct research. For things like this, you need engineers, technicians, institutes and knowledge. I don't care why the fu*ck Arabs and Iranians can't enter the list, but there is a success, so please shut up and do something useful for the community.
The only thing you have shown is that you lack intelligence.
Many firms are not listed in that f*cking American list because that list is made by f*cking ignorant American b*stards. So please shut up and reply when you have the brains to understand what it is that I responded to. I did not even mention Turkey once in that post.
If you do not have the brains to understand my earlier post, come back so I can break it down into even simpler bits so that perhaps kindergarten students can understand, or maybe so that they can help you understand.
Edit:
Let me repeat my earlier post. If you fail to understand it and respond with idiocy, it only shows that your intelligence is at the same level as that of Indian Idiots. Not surprisingly, it is those Indian Idiots that thank your post.
1. This list only calculates using revenues in US$.
2. Countries with huge "defense" (offense, actually) budgets like USA compared to their 'rivals' are bound to have more companies in the list. Even if country X, Y or Z has some of the most advanced scientific, industrial and technological basis but no political decision to spend much on military, not many companies from those countries will be on such lists.
3. USA, for example, finds a disproportionately high number of companies in this list because no Chinese companies are listed, because they 'extort' huge sums of money from idiotic despotic rulers in certain desert kingdoms for pretty much useless and downgraded weapons that can never be used against USA or even Europe. At the same time, most European countries, Japan, or similar countries spend much less on 'defense' than USA as % of their gov't budget because they are politically 'aligned'/'dependent' on USA.
4. US based firms are able to snare many more contracts from almost all countries around the world due to their strong media, propaganda and political departments. Examples are Rafale vs F-16 in Morocco. Morocco chose F-16 even though Rafale was better in almost every performance indicator simply because of American political 'clout'. France is not even half as powerful in global politics today. I reckon the same was the case in Singapore and South Korea.
5. Again, the problem with 'revenues' is that it only calculates the amount earned, not necessarily whether equipment provided by that company is necessarily of a higher quality than its counterparts. As a result, Dassault would earn 0 euro for selling 0 rafaleabroad, but Lockheed Martin/Boeing would earn billions for selling the much worse F-16/F-15 to Morocco, Korea or Singapore, perhaps.
6. I think Iranian, Kazakh, or maybe some Arab and similar firms were omitted from the list on purpose, as their earlier publications also did because they could not find data, or for some political reasons.
7. In short, this list is just an interesting list to pore over but one should not read too much into it.
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/turkey...e-institute-list-83th-rank.html#ixzz1yXgo8qSL