What's new

T90 Compared with Al Khalid

. .
updated version has it. The basic S (Bhishma) version has 840.
Bhisma is Modified Version of T-90S. These tanks were made by Uralvagonzavod and the updated 1,000 hp (750 kW) engines were delivered by Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant.
T-90 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

there two version of Bhisma S and M.All In future, the HVF is expected to retrofit all 987 T-90 MBTs with active protection systems (APS) for which Army HQ on April 24 last year issued requests for proposals to six companies (Israel Military Industries, RAFAEL, BAE Systems, Raytheon, Rosoboronexport, Saab, and Germany’s IBD Deisenroth Engineering) for procuring 1,657 active protection systems (APS) worth $270 million.
 
Last edited:
.
As I said..it is not tank vs tank. Tanks are not used in a battle field that way. The real enemies of tanks are helicopters, anti tank missiles, fighters and bombers.
thats one of the reasons why i said its about how one uses weaponry in a battlefield that makes the difference. But since the thread is abt tank vs tank so focus.

Bhisma is Modified Version of T-90S. These tanks were made by Uralvagonzavod and the updated 1,000 hp (750 kW) engines were delivered by Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant.
T-90 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
read my comparison post fully first. Wikipedia info doesnt really matter.
 
.
thats one of the reasons why i said its about how one uses weaponry in a battlefield that makes the difference. But since the thread is abt tank vs tank so focus.


read my comparison post fully first. Wikipedia info doesnt really matter.
Your comparison is Totally on wrong grounds All T-90 are Mean to be upgraded to T-90 M Bhisma
TRISHUL: India’s ‘Born Again’ T-90M MBT
 
.
Your comparison is Totally on wrong grounds All T-90 are Mean to be upgraded to T-90 M Bhisma
TRISHUL: India’s ‘Born Again’ T-90M MBT
An idiot will remain an idiot. Let me re-post for u.

Propulsion

The T-90S will be powered by a 1,000 hp V-92S2 four-stroke V-12 diesel engine. This new engine, fitted with a turbo-supercharger, offers impressive specific power and specific fuel consumption characteristics. The tank can carry up to 1600 litres of fuel in the main, armour plated fuel tanks and fuel drums. The tank is provided with a snorkel for deep fording (up to 5 metres of water) with equipment which can be deployed in 20 minutes. The mechanical transmission includes primary reduction gear, two planetary final gearboxes and two planetary final drives. The running gear features torsion bar suspension with hydraulic shock absorbers at 1, 2 and 6 road wheel stations and tracks with rubber-metallic pin hinges.

T
hese stats are from 2009 and is a comparison on basic versions of both tanks.
 
Last edited:
. . .
An idiot will remain an idiot. Let me re-post for u.

Propulsion

The T-90S will be powered by a 1,000 hp V-92S2 four-stroke V-12 diesel engine. This new engine, fitted with a turbo-supercharger, offers impressive specific power and specific fuel consumption characteristics. The tank can carry up to 1600 litres of fuel in the main, armour plated fuel tanks and fuel drums. The tank is provided with a snorkel for deep fording (up to 5 metres of water) with equipment which can be deployed in 20 minutes. The mechanical transmission includes primary reduction gear, two planetary final gearboxes and two planetary final drives. The running gear features torsion bar suspension with hydraulic shock absorbers at 1, 2 and 6 road wheel stations and tracks with rubber-metallic pin hinges.

T
hese status are from 2009 and is a comparison on basic versions of both tanks.
Only a Idiot Compare Tank vs Tank Like This.:hitwall:
 
. .
Then ask the OP kid, why cry on my door? The thread is abt tank vs Tank so focus......


I wasn't comparing anything. Read the thread, i was pushing a certain member to answer questions he made regarding the T-90.
 
. .
I wasn't comparing anything. Read the thread, i was pushing a certain member to answer questions he made regarding the T-90.
no no friend i was not exactly accusing u of anything, im myself a big Russian and socialism admirer. But was just trying to shhuuuuuu offf this indian who was posting without reading my post fully.

AK in the end is made for Pakistan's deserts by keeping in mind our own climatic and terrain conditions while same is true for T90 and Russia.
 
.
I think the tank comparison discussion can be closed by having capable attack helicopters. No matter how good a tank is, a good attack helicopter can take care of it.

T-90 is an upgraded T-72. T-72 burnt like a wood house when it was confronted by Americans in Iraq.

I m not even sure how even most capable tanks can survive when the adversary has a fleet of gunship helicopters. Just my two cents.
 
.
I think the tank comparison discussion can be closed by having capable attack helicopters. No matter how good a tank is, a good attack helicopter can take care of it.

T-90 is an upgraded T-72. T-72 burnt like a wood house when it was confronted by Americans in Iraq.

I m not even sure how even most capable tanks can survive when the adversary has a fleet of gunship helicopters. Just my two cents.
Gunship in enemy's airspace will require a complete SEAD and total air superiority.Neither India or Pakistan currently can achieve that in case of a war.So it will come down to tank vs tank in Thar.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom