Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The life of such a design will be severely limited because a huge fraction of satellite mass is usually fuel that is used to adjust the attitude of satellite throughout its life. Did you know the only factor determining the life of satellite is the amount of fuel it carries for corrective maneuvers!
And lastly I couldn't find a link to ofeq satellite, maybe you can help?
I got the link of ofeq and As I predicted the life was 1-3 years!
N. Korea is a bold statement...
Dont know about China or Pakistan .
But ISRO in India is totally under the control of PMO like that of DAE .
Totally governed by civilian institution .Some products and services have dual use but ISRO would always keep a distance from military and always reluctant in military use. .That is why you cant see a uniform in live telecast of our missions .They are not welcomed in there as one from military .
Pakistani Military Generals already run the place, perhaps they are the ones who are incompetent?
looks like suparco is run by military generals rather than Scientists and Engineers.
@amardeep mishra you brought up the patent discussion again. Last time in the same discussion I asked you to share with us the list of all the patents filed under any xtz defence project in India but haven't got any response from you. I'll try again, this time with a much simpler query, what do you think is the purpose of a patent?
even if there is no one will tell youAnybody from suparco in PDF ?
even if there is no one will tell you
A very typical example of butt-printed pseudo facts....any credible source...of course not....how are you referring to diameters ...is there any official source?
It can not be denied, that the Pakistani solid fuel rockets Ghaznavi and Shaheen-1 are similar to the Chinese DF-11 missile type.
On photos is recognizable, that the Chinese DF-11 and DF-11A by set of some solid fuel segments are built. The DF-11 uses two segments. For the DF-11A is a third segment added.
For the Pakistani Shaheen-1 is a further half segment added. All rocket types have the same diameter of 0.88 m. The Shaheen-1 have however a striking extended skirt in the nozzle area, because the missile has another control system and a larger nozzle (?).
On photos is clearly recognizable, that also the Chinese DF-15 and DF-15A by set of several short solid fuel segments are built. Four segments uses the DF-15, and the extended DF-15A uses five segments. All rockets have a diameter of ~1.10 m. The DF-15 missile type is obviously not exported.
Unknown are the Chinese rocket variants M-9 and M-18. They are referred as export variants. So is suspected that the Pakistani Shaheen-1 corresponds to the M-9. The M-18 probably corresponds to the Pakistani Shaheen-2. The Chinese M-18 was allegedly shown at the 1987 Beijing air show. Now I have found Photos of the M-18 missile ! (see below)
The Shaheen-2 is totally different to the DF-11 and DF-15 missile types. The diameter is significantly 1.40 m. China Hexi Chemical & Mechanical Company presents solid motors for first stages with the name L-SpaB. Very capable for the Shaheen-2 is the motor L-SpaB-140B with 1.40 m in diameter and a length of 7.15 m. For the second stage is a shorter solid motor SpaB-140 capable. A candidate for the M-18 is the completely unknown DF-25.
It is also not known whether the Iran from China have bought M-9 or M-18 missiles. This is unlikely. The new Iranian Sejil (syn. Ashura, Ghadr 110) missile is not of Chinese origin. It is not known that China have builded solid rockets with a diameter of 1.25 m.
Nozzle comparison
DF-15/DF-11
ask nicely and you may get a reply
A very typical example of butt-printed pseudo facts....any credible source...of course not....how are you referring to diameters ...is there any official source?
ask nicely and you may get a reply
thats it...... now wait for a reply
& there is no similarities !?
Like this ?