Street Interview of the Chinese Gen Z in southern Guangdong province: Would you go to the war if China needs you to fight for the reunification

[jhungary]

Do you understand the DIFFERENCE between MILITARY and POLITICAL defeat? And who lost militarily and who left the war earlier? Can you understand these words? Can you understand english?

dude, let him be, 50 cents really need to earn 50 cents.

If they think US lost the Vietnam war and we don't dare to fight China, you should let him think like that lol, I don't mind, at the end of the day, it will be people like me against people like them who don't even know which end the bullet come out from a gun.

US Army did 1 job, and we did that pretty good, and that is to F up the enemy, how did I know? I used to do that for a living. Leave the political bullshit aside. These people would probably only able to talk tough, when there are call for action, they are probably the first one to turn tail and run. Which mean no point talking about winning a war or losing to these people.

 

[beijingwalker]

. Leave the political bullshit aside. These people would probably only able to talk tough, when there are call for action, they are probably the first one to turn tail and run. Which mean no point talking about winning a war or losing to these people.

Good, you can come and try.

 

[Foinikas]

dude, let him be, 50 cents really need to earn 50 cents.

If they think US lost the Vietnam war and we don't dare to fight China, you should let him think like that lol, I don't mind, at the end of the day, it will be people like me against people like them who don't even know which end the bullet come out from a gun.

US Army did 1 job, and we did that pretty good, and that is to F up the enemy, how did I know? I used to do that for a living. Leave the political bullshit aside. These people would probably only able to talk tough, when there are call for action, they are probably the first one to turn tail and run. Which mean no point talking about winning a war or losing to these people.

Is he trying to gain some extra Yuan by showing absolute devotion to the Party and stubborness? Pretending he doesn't understand english well?

 

[jhungary]

Is he trying to gain some extra Yuan by showing absolute devotion to the Party and stubborness? Pretending he doesn't understand english well?

No idea..,,maybe.

 

[beijingwalker]

Is he trying to gain some extra Yuan by showing absolute devotion to the Party and stubborness? Pretending he doesn't understand english well?

Personal attack again after losing your argument? just take a poll here to find out who poeple think lost the Vietnam, would you? since you are so eager to prove your point.

If I were you, I would rather care about my own country instead of being so hell bent to serve as an US cheerleader.

 

[Foinikas]

Personal attack again after losing your argument? just take a poll here to find out who poeple think lost the Vietnam, would you? since you are so eager to prove your point.

If I were you, I would rather care about my own country instead of being so hell bent to serve as an US cheerleader.

What's the matter? It ruins your propaganda posts?

 

[beijingwalker]

What's the matter? It ruins your propaganda posts?

Thank you for keeping my thread on top.

 

[Mista]

@Foinikas @jhungary

Why do you guys even bother? For the years I've been here I've never seen beijingwalker making a constructive or convincing rebuttal before. All he can come out is some lameass 2 liner post with selective reading and embarrass himself and his countrymen.

I would've put him in my ignore list if he didn't provide me with entertainment by creating 10 threads everyday.

 

[Menthol]

War?

That is stupid.

I already know the story since it's in the prophecy.

At first, Chinese people seem to be very eager to go to war, but after the war, all of them regret it.

The destruction is massive, almost all Chinese great cities are gone, and it's not the worst, the radiation cloud is an even much bigger danger.


But this is necessary because we are going to enter a new chapter of human history, which is what the middle eastern call the Millenium Kingdom.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

In the span of 10 years of war.

Check the casualties:

View attachment 872903

The US had been pulverizing them. They kept coming of course,but they had crazy losses.


Did you notice in my previous posts,that I mentioned the word "militarily"? Not politically? If you didn't,go back and read it again.

losing disproportionate amounts of high end strategic assets in a limited war is the definition of a military loss. not all wars are total wars of survival. losing because you lost too many strategic assets and troops to be sustainable is a military loss.

and you can't just compare North Vietnam casualties vs. US alone, because they had South Vietnamese puppet regime too. North Vietnam vs. US+South Vietnam is almost exactly even.

Vietnam War casualties - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

North Vietnam/Viet Cong military and civilian war dead	533,000	1,062,000	1,489,000
South Vietnam/U.S./South Korea war military and civilian war dead	429,000	741,000	1,119,000

 

[Foinikas]

@Foinikas @jhungary

Why do you guys even bother? For the years I've been here I've never seen beijingwalker making a constructive or convincing rebuttal before. All he can come out is some lameass 2 liner post with selective reading and embarrass himself and his countrymen.

I would've put him in my ignore list if he didn't provide me with entertainment by creating 10 threads everyday.

losing disproportionate amounts of high end strategic assets in a limited war is the definition of a military loss. not all wars are total wars of survival. losing because you lost too many strategic assets and troops to be sustainable is a military loss.

and you can't just compare North Vietnam casualties vs. US alone, because they had South Vietnamese puppet regime too. North Vietnam vs. US+South Vietnam is almost exactly even.

Vietnam War casualties - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

North Vietnam/Viet Cong military and civilian war dead	533,000	1,062,000	1,489,000
South Vietnam/U.S./South Korea war military and civilian war dead	429,000	741,000	1,119,000

You put both ARVN and US casualties in one basket. That's not the way. We're talking about U.S. vs PAVN and NVA. And in comparison,they suffered way more casualties.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

You put both ARVN and US casualties in one basket. That's not the way. We're talking about U.S. vs PAVN and NVA. And in comparison,they suffered way more casualties.

why? US objective was to support its treaty ally ARVN. if it failed to do so, then it was defeated.

By your logic, if Soviets in 1975 rolled over West Germany, killed 500k west Germans, took just 100k casualties, but US military took 50k casualties before retreating from Germany and declaring the Rhine to be the new border between NATO and Warsaw Pact, this is only a 'political defeat', because west German land and lives don't count despite being a NATO ally and it was a "2:1 casualty advantage for the US"

 

[Foinikas]

why? US objective was to support its treaty ally ARVN. if it failed to do so, then it was defeated.

By your logic, if Soviets in 1975 rolled over West Germany, killed 500k west Germans, took just 100k casualties, but US military took 50k casualties before retreating from Germany and declaring the Rhine to be the new border between NATO and Warsaw Pact, this is only a 'political defeat', because west German land and lives don't count despite being a NATO ally and it was a "2:1 casualty advantage for the US"

PAVN and NVA also had support from China and USSR. Don't forget that!

And for the last time,you two Chinese need to notice when somebody says "USA was not militarily defeated in the war" as opposed to politically.

Just like Germany in WWI for example.

 

[jhungary]

@Foinikas @jhungary

Why do you guys even bother? For the years I've been here I've never seen beijingwalker making a constructive or convincing rebuttal before. All he can come out is some lameass 2 liner post with selective reading and embarrass himself and his countrymen.

I would've put him in my ignore list if he didn't provide me with entertainment by creating 10 threads everyday.

Dude is fun to poke, if I want entertainment, I ama gonna poke at him..

Except the time he threatens to kill my family........lol

why? US objective was to support its treaty ally ARVN. if it failed to do so, then it was defeated.

By your logic, if Soviets in 1975 rolled over West Germany, killed 500k west Germans, took just 100k casualties, but US military took 50k casualties before retreating from Germany and declaring the Rhine to be the new border between NATO and Warsaw Pact, this is only a 'political defeat', because west German land and lives don't count despite being a NATO ally and it was a "2:1 casualty advantage for the US"

No, US objective is to stop communism spread outside Vietnam into Indonesia and Philippine, propping up ARVN government is (or was) a mean to do that, and that (Stopping communism spread) is done when US made a backdoor deal with China to contain Vietnam and Soviet. That is the reason why US withdraw from Vietnam.

And do you see communism spread outside Vietnam??

If our job is to prop up ARVN regime, then withdrawing from Vietnam does not make sense at all. because well, we are there to prop them up.

 

[DF41]

Do you understand the DIFFERENCE between MILITARY and POLITICAL defeat? And who lost militarily and who left the war earlier? Can you understand these words? Can you understand english?

The only military won by Murica was in Nicaragua and Panama and Grenada.

Murica should have fought Vatican and Principality of Sealand.
Murica can be assured of resounding military victories