While most Indians claim, intentionally or unintentionally, all over the place that Arunachal Pradesh (South Tibet) is an integral part of India, (see in
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...china-not-reality-says-pm-manmohan-singh.html ) I actually find, with factual truth, that
Arunachal Pradesh (South Tibet) is NOT an integral part of India.
Friends, the following is why Arunachal Pradesh (South Tibet) is NOT an integral part of India. And there is no legal ground for Indians to claim so.
While it is true that there are some traces of Indian cultural relics found in AP, it had been more that Tibetans who ruled ZN before the British took it over.
For simplicity, just get a rough picture from wiki:
Simla Accord has been trashed by the very UK itself:
Thus, India has only recently (after 1962) occupied the territory illegally, and there is no legal ground for Indians to claim that ZN(AP) is an integral part of India.
Dissidents from India or Tibetans in exile who want to be indian, voice your different/opposing opinions.
No jingoism, no slogans, as they count nothing in a legal argument among matured grown-ups.