We have never said that we're strong as you claimed...you just inflate our capabilities..not us..I just brought up some points to answer about USHawk785's saying that China just talk not walks.
Africa, Middle east are not US enemies, i've never said that but U.S want to counter China's influence...such case of Libya..that they want to remove the disliked Gadafi that give china oil concession...without saying Sudan
As for Asat...I just want to tell this guy..we walk not just talk as we take initiative to demonstrate to U.S that their space asset can be jeopadized in case of conflict with China...Space asset is American military heart and brain...without it...U.S will lost their effectiveness of fighting...regardless if they have defense or not against Asat...they sure know that we have this capability.
For the rest of what I said...it's pretty obvious...China has no obligation to embrace structures and organizations that Western has created such UN ..IMF and WTO...the creation of BRICS and SCO are good example of this world reorganization...that thing will evolve in the future.
as for Indians and Vietnameses...you guys must feel more secure to have an American in this Thread...to backup your claim about Krisna's statement ..with U.S carrier battle group pictures...
Comprehension problem dude? I guess i will have to explain it to you. In your reply to USAhawk you mentioned what China could do against the US. This means you are saying that China has the capability to do all that what you mentioned. That is what i have refuted. Then what makes you think that i am inflating Chinese capabilities? It is you who are exaggerating Chinese capabilities. Anybody who reads your post #400 will probably come to the same conclusion.
Further you mentioned "we walk around your enemies vinesuela (you mean Venezuela), Cuba, Sudan...Africa, Middle-east". Such a statement can lead anybody to conclude that you are calling Africa and Middle-east as US enemies along with Venezuela and Cuba. If that is not the case then you should have put it in a proper manner to indicate what you really meant.
As for A-sat, do you think that Chinese A-sat is as advanced as the US one? I guess not.
consider this eg. US, Russia, Israel all have AESA radars. But Russian and Israeli radars do not match the US ones in capability. As far as Electronic warfare and A-sat capabilities are concerned, US is the tops.
You said that satellites are the heart and brain of US military. Since this is the case it is obvious that they will be having defenses against your A-sat capabilities. In that case how will US lose its war fighting effectiveness if they can defend against your A-SAT? Further what makes you think that US will not use its A-SAT against China? In that case guess what will happen to Chinese war fighting capability? Note that satellites have a very important role in modern warfare and so if the Chinese ones are destroyed, then....you know what.
These rest of what you said is also not obvious as you claim. You are comparing UN, IMF, WTO which are global organizations with BRICS, SCO which are smaller/regional organizations. BRICS and SCO cannot be substitutes to the UN, IMF, WTO. For this to happen BRICS AND SCO would require more members than the UN which is highly unlikely. They may grow in the future but your perception of these bodies taking the place of UN, IMF, WTO is a bit too far-fetched.
As for your claim of Indians and Vietnamese feeling more secure to have an American in this thread to back up our claims, i could say the same thing about Chinese when Pakistanis support them against Indians in this thread. we are quite capable of taking on you Chinese in arguments and don't need anybody's help, although by having the Americans we would be paying you in the same coin.
In the end i would like to point out that your posts will lead a person to probably arrive at the same conclusion as i have. If you think that my conclusions are not as per the intended meaning of your posts then do convey your intended meaning by being more specific.
Also do not be in a delusion that Indians got owned by the Chinese in this thread or in this forum or that we need anybody to feel secure. That is just an illusion that you are harboring.