South China Sea Forum

[cochine]

haha, a book with NO consistent name, and no one knows what the author said exactly in the original version! you even cite this as the core historic evidence for vn claim on the south China sea islands! what a strong and convincing proof! haha, enjoy your book.

btw, if you can pay me 100k dollar, I can create 10 similar books for you in one week.

ancient Vietnam book is written on special paper and material. You can not do like this.

one more old map of Vietnam wiht Paracel and Spratly in near by..

 

[GS Zhou]

Any case, the ancient book has stated clearly that the Islands does belong to Vietnam territory, part of Quang Ngai Province Vietnam.



westerner scholars had recognized that Paracel and Spratly is part of territory Vietnam from long time ago.

according to this fancy map:
1. north vietnam and south vietnam are two separate countries, because they painted in different colours.
2. a largr part of Guangxi province belongs to north Vietnam. look at the border between China and North Vietnam, the border line even close to the Leizhou Peninsula. you can use this map to claim your right on guangxi as well.

ancient Vietnam book is written on special paper and material. You can not do like this.

one more old map of Vietnam wiht Paracel and Spratly in near by..

I dont care the socalled special paper or material. show me the original version, not the replicated version created by later generation.

another trash map. with basic PS skill, even a young kid can create such credible and reliable map.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

stop lie here my dude. Spratly and Paracel was controlled and part of Vietnam sovereignty from long time in the past .

claim and occupation of china is illegal.

Full map òf China KMT printed in China 1936. No where ís Spratly and Paracel Islands.

atually i stopped bothering replying to Kecho's post when the map shows Taiwan in white colour conisdering that the map states Zhonghuaminguo Quan Tu- and an authentic unedited KMT map would had showed taiwan as part of China

 

[cochine]

according to this fancy map:
1. north vietnam and south vietnam are two separate countries, because they painted in different colours.
2. a largr part of Guangxi province belongs to north Vietnam. look at the border between China and North Vietnam, the border line even close to the Leizhou Peninsula. you can use this map to claim your right on guangxi as well.


I dont care the socalled special paper or material. show me the original version, not the replicated version created by later generation.

another trash map. with basic PS skill, even a young kid can create such credible and reliable map.

Vietnam is one country under Le Dynasty Vietnam, but two area was controlled by two warlord, there is our history.

atually i stopped bothering replying to Kecho's post when the map shows Taiwan in white colour conisdering that the map states Zhonghuaminguo Quan Tu- and an authentic unedited KMT map would had showed taiwan as part of China

Taiwan was part of Japan Imperial in 1936. Japan annexed Taiwan to her after first Sino-Japan war 1895.

when we would like to claim back Guanxi to us, we no need this map becaues Gunagxi is ancient land of us, later on there was part of Nan Yue in the past. Nan Yue land is ancient land of Vietnam. The land of Jiao Zhou when China illegally had occoupated in the past.

 

[GS Zhou]

when we would like to claim back Guanxi to us, we no need this map becaues Gunagxi is ancient land of us, later on there was part of Nan Yue in the past. Nan Yue land is ancient land of Vietnam. The land of Jiao Zhou when China illegally had occoupated in the past.

This guy is keeping posting suspicious maps about the South China Sea, although the maps are proved unreliable. But now this guy even throws out more trash map to claim even Guangxi Province of China belongs to Vietnam. I have to say he trolls toooooo far.
Will be great if the admin. team can take some actions to stop this guy's violation on PDF rule. Many thanks!

 

[艹艹艹]

Vietnam is one country under Le Dynasty Vietnam, but two area was controlled by two warlord, there is our history.



Taiwan was part of Japan Imperial in 1936. Japan annexed Taiwan to her after first Sino-Japan war 1895.

when we would like to claim back Guanxi to us, we no need this map becaues Gunagxi is ancient land of us, later on there was part of Nan Yue in the past. Nan Yue land is ancient land of Vietnam. The land of Jiao Zhou when China illegally had occoupated in the past.

Tang Dynasty

Han Dynasty

 

[ahojunk]

This guy is keeping posting suspicious maps about the South China Sea, although the maps are proved unreliable. But now this guy even throws out more trash map to claim even Guangxi Province of China belongs to Vietnam. I have to say he trolls toooooo far.
Will be great if the admin. team can take some actions to stop this guy's violation on PDF rule. Many thanks!

Okay, going forward no more posting of maps more than 100 years old.
I will issue warnings and bans.

 

[GS Zhou]

Okay, going forward no more posting of maps more than 100 years old.
I will issue warnings and bans.

thank you sir!

@kecho be cautious to your PDF membership.

 

[艹艹艹]

westerner scholars had recognized that Paracel and Spratly is part of territory Vietnam from long time ago

French? Vietnam used to be a colony of France.

 

[cochine]

French? Vietnam used to be a colony of France.

how about China in the past ?

(my last answer for you is deleted by mod).

 

[艹艹艹]

how about China in the past ?

Vietnam used to be a China's vassal state.

 

[cochine]

DUTERTE WELCOMES POSSIBLE JOINT EXERCISES WITH JAPAN
Posted on October 27, 2016

Photo by Tomohiro Ohsumi.
Share on FacebookTweet on Twitter


Philippines is open to have joint exercises with Japan, President Rodrigo Duterte said in a chance interview after he visited the Japan Coast Guard on Thursday afternoon.

“Joint exercise with Japan in general terms is not a problem. Stationing of Japanese troops was not discussed and with the Americans, it’s problematic,” Duterte told reporters one day after saying he wanted foreign troops out of his country “maybe in the next two years”.

Duterte also said the patrol vessels from Japan would be used within the territorial waters of the Philippines, including the West Philippine Sea.

In July, the Coast Guards of both countries conducted their sixth Joint Maritime Law Enforcement (MARLEN) Exercise.

However, Duterte said there was no mention of visiting forces agreement during his meeting with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

“Specifically, walang mention ang Japanese diyan eh,” he explained.

http://tankler.com/duterte-welcomes-possible-joint-exercises-with-japan-9234

 

[GS Zhou]

There was diplomacy gift between two kingdom's Emperor paid for Turkis (Tang), Mongolian (Yuan) and Tungus (Qing) who invaded and ruled you in China.

how is the feeling in jail? hope you can survive longer this round.

 

[cochine]

how is the feeling in jail? hope you can survive longer this round.

I will stop to say it here, when your guys could shut up about "colony" or "vassal state" to insult us on this forum.

Look at how chinese people had suffered and survived in your history. The elite chinese had said that, there is humiliation century of China.

 

[terranMarine]

I will stop to say it here, when your guys could shut up about "colony" or "vassal state" to insult us on this forum.

Look at how chinese people had suffered and survived in your history. The elite chinese had said that, there is humiliation century of China.

Is a century humiliation worse than a millennium humiliation? Being a vassal state of China for 1006 years , then ruled by the French for couple of decades and briefly became Japanese vassal state. As if that wasn't worse enough you guys suffered at the hands of the Yankees for nearly 20 years. The aftermath proved to be even disastrous when your people had to deal with the consequences of chemical warfare and international sanctions placed by the US. So i suggest you to learn to shut up about century of humiliation because it looks much worse on your side than it is on our side.