What's new

Some of you really don't understand what Mera Jism Meri Marzi stands for, and it shows

It is... Unless you you into the Western FemiNazi propaganda ..

Feminism Tricked Women Into Giving Up Their Power

May 21, 2019

BROWN-OBIT-popup.jpg
(l. Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown in her office in 1965)

Women want love, marriage and family.

Men want Sex.

Before second-wave feminism, the watchword for
women was "No sex before marriage."


Feminists like Brown duped women into giving
sex in exchange for
NOTHING. Thanks partly to her,
almost 50% of American women are childless today.


She deprived women of their honoured natural and social roles
as wives and mothers. Feminism pretended to empower women
while doing exactly the opposite.


"For every genuine case of men sexually harassing women, there are probably ten cases of women using sex for advancement. Helen Gurley Brown made that strategy explicit." -Reader


Cosmo Editor Helen Gurley Brown, (1922-2012) was called "champion of the single girl". She taught them to sell their bodies rather than demand love, courtship and marriage first. She was an Illuminati social engineer, a satanist whore who made prostitution seem chic.

In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and had sex with a 50-year-old man for $5 (worth $80 today.) Page 4 She also boasted she slept with 178 men before her marriage.




Illuminati Taught Young Women to Trade in Sex
From Aug. 14, 2012

By Henry Makow Ph.D.


In 1965, Helen Gurley Brown, the editor of Cosmopolitan, said that a housewife was "a parasite, a dependent, a scrounger, a sponge or a bum." She didn't call them whores because she respects whores.

Her sister-in-arms, Betty Friedan, compared homemakers to "concentration camp inmates" because of the lack of stimulation and opportunity for advancement in concentration camps. (The Feminine Mystique, p. 306)

These mid boggling attacks typify the vicious psychological war against society by Illuminati Satanists. Their program to degrade women, destroy families, arrest heterosexual development, create dysfunction and reduce population has been devastatingly successful.

"The scale of marital breakdown in the West since 1960 has no historical precedent," says historian Lawrence Stone. In 40 short years, the marriage rate is down by one third, the divorce rate has doubled, the birth rate is one half, and single-parent families per capita have tripled. Forty per cent of all children born in the US in 2007 were out of wedlock compared to 4% in 1957. (Bennett, The Broken Hearth, p.10)

In 1952, the Rockefellers controlled $250 million dollars of media advertising annually. They hyped Helen Gurley Brown's 1962 book, "Sex and the Single Girl" and the movie. Single women were told they should have career and sex instead of family. At the same time, the Rockefellers were also funding and lobbying for population control and eugenics.

As editor of Cosmopolitan (1965-97), Brown was a role model for career women the world over (36 foreign editions.) She married her manager at age 37 and remained childless. Along with Communist activist Betty Frieden, and CIA agent Gloria Steinem, Brown belongs to the triumvirate of modern feminist social engineers. When she died, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said, "New York City lost a pioneer who reshaped not only the entire media industry, but the nation's culture. She was a role model for the millions of women whose private thoughts, wonders and dreams she addressed so brilliantly in print."


cos-ashley-greene-cosmo-cover-mdn-37543620.jpg
(left, every issue is a HO issue)


WHAT HOUSEWIVES ARE NOT...


Brown respects whores because prostitution is her program for women. In her autobiography, "I'm Wild Again" (2000) she tells us right away that in 1941, at age 19 she joined an "escort service" and made out with a 50-year-old man for $5 ($80 today.)

"Why wasn't I revolted? I was a little but not utterly. I think even then I was a practising realist... I tried to do whatever you needed to do to survive." (4)

She got a secretarial job on the understanding that she would sleep with her married boss and he would "take care" of her in return. This arrangement lasted for a few years. She describes the routine:

"After cocktail hour we did go to my flat to make love. The lovemaking? ...This was two people copulating -- he seemed to have a good time...Moi learned to fake often and well." (15)

Brown's excuse is that she was a helping a mother and invalid sister back in Arkansas. (Prostitutes generally don't come from wealth.)

Her only regret: she never really got the promised financial payoff: "I needed somebody to tell me how to treat a man in this situation, how to flatter and cuddle and coo. I should have done it better." (19)

Helen Gurley Brown became that tutor. She taught women how to parlay sex appeal into profit and control. She helped to transform feminine nature from love and devotion to calculated predation.

at-home.jpg

(At home with husband, producer David Brown)

Here is how she got her husband to marry her.

"You get the hook in. The darling, charming, delicious, sexy you has to have sunk into him so seriously; the hook [is] buried so deep he can't get it out without severe pain, i.e. can't live without you. You then close in and deliver your ultimatum. I had to deliver mine twice."(27)

While Brown claims she was loyal, she thinks adultery is just fine. The man's wife is to blame if he strays. Sex, Brown says, "is a physical feeling" "it feels good... one of the best things we have...." not to be subjected to "a moral imperative."

Suffocating a sexual urge can lead to "twitches, tension or depression" and driving "off a cliff some night." (52) But, like a practised madam, she cautions "never sleep with someone who has less money or more troubles than you." (225)

Office romances and even sleeping with the boss is just fine as long as you're discreet. (107) She tells her readers to make the boss "look good," let him take credit for their work, and don't complain about putting in extra hours.

Feminism, it seems, has removed wives and mothers from their families, and put them to work for corporations. Instead of serving husbands and children who love them, women now obey bosses who pay for their services and fire them in a downturn.

In Brown's view, if a loving husband provides for a devoted wife, she is a "parasite." But if she is a corporate slave or whore, then she is "independent" and "liberated."

This quote from the review of a new biography reiterates her contempt for marriage and family: "When "Sex and the Single Girl" came out in the early 1960s, the most shocking thing ... was Brown's matter-of-fact attitude toward affairs with married men."

Feminism is an excuse to sell yourself:

"...she recommended that her readers take advantage of the situation, milking a guilty and grateful married lover for gifts, money and workplace advancement, which Brown regarded as fair recompense for the fact that men got paid more than women and kept the best jobs for themselves."


220px-Sexandsinglegirl.jpg
FAMILY vs. FEMINISM: THE BATTLE LINE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER


The message that sexual urges were not to be denied, that promiscuity was "cool" and "modern," was instilled in women to degrade them and undermine marriage. The state is intended to replace the family.

In reality, women achieve fulfilment through self-sacrifice. It is a vicious slander to portray devoted hardworking wives and mothers as "bums" and "parasites."

The assumption that only work performed for cash (state/economy) is of value is sick. They want to denigrate the personal and spiritual realm, the private life of the family and the effort that this entails.

Brown says, "Whenever you live through someone else, they want someone else." This is simply not true. We love mom because she put us ahead of becoming the top producer at Century 21. Love is self-sacrifice.

Beyond a certain point, worldly ambition in a woman is masculine and impersonal. America is full of bitter neutered women and befuddled emasculated men.

Making a lot of sense as I see here the toxic effect of feminism everyday at workplace.
 
These are Muslim women yes?

Why don't they ask for their Rights clearly stated by Allah in Quran. And at the same time commit to give the men's rights too!

Anyways these liberals are a small minority trying to speak for a large silent majority of Muslim women who will eventually shut them up.

Cut their NGO funding firstly. Then we will see how many come out to march.

As Khalil-ur-Rehman said, we make dua for all liberals in this march to have daughters just like Marvi Sarmad.
Why do they need to ask for their Rights as clearly stated by Allah in Quran?
Why is it not part of the so called Islamic culture as a matter of course?
Why is it only the parts that keep women in their place as an oppressed group that are implemented?
Why have they been denied these rights for so long?
If Muslim men had been fair and God fearing they would have given women the rights to which they are entitled and then Muslim societies across the world would be transformed. They haven't so you get women fighting for their rights on whatever platform they can.
Hypocrisy much?
You bet.
 
I do not understand why certain people think ... legislation equals rights? Is there no violence against women in the west? Perhaps the single largest crime category... believe you me that the guy who commits an act of violence against women is not looking to educate himself at women's march... and demands/rights being made. A more comprehensive education at early age and a cultured person wouldn't vent using his full might on frail women.
 
Contrary to popular belief, it's not about how you dress —although it does include that too!
This statement remains inherently contradictory. Do these aurat marchers want to be allowed to parade their bodies in general public or not?

Most men I know simply self-censor and willingly surrender their "human right that they're born with to parade their body publicly". Why should females not do likewise, for all sorts of perfectly sensible reasons? I'm sick of attention-seeking female implied victimhood whereby they rightly rally against fgm, forced marriage, honour crime, illegality of abortion etc but then in the same breath yell "Mera jism meri marzi" which negates the positive messages they're advocating for.

This nakedness equating to freedom was an idea dreamt up in some NGO think tank funded by malevolent foreign organisations and governments, the same types of colonial orientalist perversionists who feel no queasiness when white foreigners run over Pakistani citizens and skip arrest but suddenly cry and moan when Pakistani citizens feel obliged to dress modestly. The pleasant humility observed by non-attention-seeking males AND females with traditional Pakistani values is a breath of fresh air in this confused world. Certainly some of the messages about increasing opportunities for females emanating from events like aurat March are worthy of everyone's support....but "mera jism meri marzi" is pollution of that message.
 
No one has a problem with the issues women face, we all understand it. We DO have a problem with their champion:

View attachment 611441 View attachment 611442 View attachment 611443 View attachment 611444 View attachment 611445

True people dont treat her as a worthless bag of trash bcz of her looks but her filthy mouth and her hypocrisy. She blurts about freedom of speech 24/7 but when someone doesn't talk her tune she throws worst kind of abuse at them. Body shaming came after she started abusing other people on live talk shows.

You shitting me, the guy deserves highest medal living with a creature like that.
And now you know why she is obsessed with other peoples sperms. That guy's on left is her husband.
Dnvjcc7WsAAGQhK
 
Don't fret, we got you as long as you read with an open mind and to understand and not to pointlessly argue.

5e60cbb72d699.jpg

Don't fret, we got you as long as you read with an open mind and to understand and not to pointlessly argue.

It comes as no surpise that the word jism in our society is packed with negative connotations and embedded with vulgar undertones, which makes the message of Mera jism meri marzi seem overtly sexualised, when in reality, it is anything but.





Clearly, we need to do all the emotional labour around here so let us break it down for you. Mera jism, meri marzi literally means that womxn want bodily autonomy and have the right to make decisions concerning their bodies.

Aurat March's Instagram account put it beautifully when they said, "it means an enforcement of a human right every individual is born with, but women, trans, and non-binary person are robbed of."

If this man has learnt from history, why can't you?


Contrary to popular belief, it's not about how you dress —although it does include that too!


It means no to forced pregnancies


And sexual assault and rape


Have we forgotten how many women are victims of acid attacks?


Or genital mutilation that happens behind closed doors?


For anyone who thinks it advocates for obscenity...


Spoiler alert: it doesn't


OKB knows the problem... okay? okay.


Shehzad Roy gets it. Why don't you?




Problem is not that.
Problem is most of the dumb women who participate in this march don't even get the meaning and put dumb shit on their cards, as if they were despos waiting for a chance to show off their vulgarity to the world.

And if they had a bit of brain, they would know Islam covers everything they want and even more in the rights for women. And if they were to practice that, understand that, and take up Husbands who knew that too. They won't have to go around suffering. Suffering happens when you are ignorant and then choose another ignorant as your partner.

And above all.
Mera Jism Meri Marzi does not mean you go and show off your nakedness and vulgarity to the entire world. Where is your marzi then when every stray dog can see you?
Your marzi happens when you have control on who sees and who is not allowed.
And a Muslim woman, with her modesty and piety is in complete control of her body than these ignorant fools will ever comprehend.
 
Why do they need to ask for their Rights as clearly stated by Allah in Quran?
Why is it not part of the so called Islamic culture as a matter of course?
Why is it only the parts that keep women in their place as an oppressed group that are implemented?
Why have they been denied these rights for so long?
If Muslim men had been fair and God fearing they would have given women the rights to which they are entitled and then Muslim societies across the world would be transformed. They haven't so you get women fighting for their rights on whatever platform they can.
Hypocrisy much?
You bet.

Fight for rights, I'll support too. But not with banners cursing men including their grandfather who kissed them when they were 4! "Mere Nana ne mujhe KISS kya' - WTH!!

Read the paper of demands by JI for women. Very sound.

It's the implementation of the law, the curse is the lack of it, that needs fixing.
 
True people dont treat her as a worthless bag of trash bcz of her looks but her filthy mouth and her hypocrisy. She blurts about freedom of speech 24/7 but when someone doesn't talk her tune she throws worst kind of abuse at them. Body shaming came after she started abusing other people on live talk shows.


And now you know why she is obsessed with other peoples sperms. That guy's on left is her husband.
Dnvjcc7WsAAGQhK

No Offense but that is one ugly women ..Allah ki lanat aur phitkaar waazeh nazar a rahi hai :D
 
No Offense but that is one ugly women ..Allah ki lanat aur phitkaar waazeh nazar a rahi hai :D

:lol: Yeah you should see some of her latest pics. She has fully bloomed and totally dateable :rofl: so i am sure there are plenty of singles here up for challenge.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom