Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[925boy]

The Biden packages seem to be getting smaller and less frequent.

America is broke, what else is the truth here?

 

[Hack-Hook]

Lmfao, if merely mounting unguided munitions on a drone is making it a UCAV, then the first UCAV would TDN-1 from 1942, that could drop a 1000lb bomb.

Also, the RPG-7s you mounted on that drone were basically useless

never fielded and used in war

Bruh, TDN-1 is from 1942, falls under the definition of a drone, and dropped a bomb, so garbage Iranian drone strapped with rockets wasn't even the first UCAV, not by a long shot.

never fielded and used in war

 

[Viet]

Ah cool

Military verhicles are seen before Russia confederation council.

Putin seems to plan something.

Probably he wants to dissolve the parliament and declare martial law over Russia.

The next stage on escalation ladder

"Russland wird anscheinend in Kriegssituation versetzt"

In der Nacht fahren vor dem Gebäude des Föderationsrats in Moskau Militärfahrzeuge vor. Offiziell heißt es, es handle sich um eine Übung. Für ntv-Reporter Rainer Munz passt das zu dem Eindruck, der Kreml wolle eine Kriegsstimmung im eigenen Land unter dem Motto "wir gegen den Westen" herstellen.

www.n-tv.de

 

[JackTheRipper]

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/yf7lbi

 

[Hack-Hook]

An UCAV is a combat drone.
Show proof that the Iranian ”UCAV” actually hit anything.

”The modern military drone as known today was the brainchild of John Stuart Foster Jr., a nuclear physicist and former head of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (then called the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory).[8] In 1971, Foster was a model airplane hobbyist and had the idea this hobby could be applied to building weapons.[8] He drew up plans and by 1973 DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) built two prototypes called "Prairie" and "Calera". They were powered by a modified lawn-mower engine and could stay aloft for two hours while carrying a 28-pound (13 kg) load.”

Don’t bother answer, as You are on ignore from now on.

those were RPG-7 with fragmentation warhead , we didn't need to hit anything , we fired those at barracks and areas there were chance of personnel gathering , and let the fragmentation do the work . the drone was a line of sight controlled drone , and usually several operator penetrated behind enemy lines and handed the control of the drone to each other and the last one approximated where the rocket will hit and fired it when he think it land near enemy and let the fragmentation warhead do the damage .

 

[Hack-Hook]

irst you say "your mistake is that because its above water line you think its above the ground"

Then I explained that water collect at the lowest spot on the ground, which is simple physics. Which mean if it is above waterline, then it is above ground."

let make it simpler , you think because its above water line its in sky , no its on top of the building which usually is above waterline ,
guess the meaning become more clear,

Then you say "drone hit top of the building , not first floor , and the explosion was at top of the buildings."

First, that's completely 180 degree turn from your previous comment (which is you thought it is at ground level, now you think it hit the building)

exactly what i said in first post
the drone hit top of the building , top of the building is above waterline , at night when everywhere is dark you don't see top of the buildings , but if you look at the video when they open fire you see a shadow of it and can have an estimation of where it is .

Then I explained that since that drone don't have optics and comm module, it most definitely will have an impact fuse, so when that drone hit the building, it will not have a second det like you claim before (another contradiction to what you have said)

not the second detonation , first explosion then what you see as second detonation , is burning og fuel and explosion of any explosives in the building itself for example lng capsules , gas lines , if there is explosive there .
if the drine hit with shtrapnel it fall , it wont explode , for that you need to hit it with a missile so the detonation of the warhead produce explossive waves and those explosion waves detonate the warhead in the drones.

And then I further explained that if that drone hits its target, the debris will carry the explosion forward (or whereever the drone goes) and the fireball will not be perfect ball shape, it will be leading toward the motion of travel.

no if it dive nearly vertically and also , because the camera become blind you don't see how the explosion derbies moved

lol, camera won't be blinded by the flash, that's what flash do because the explosion will last a lot longer than the flash, and what is "If the drone dive, it goes no where?" Dude, even if it dive 90 degree straight down, the momentum will carry the drone forward to heavy side up. It's like if you drop something that have serious weight on the floor, once it hit the floor, it will NOT stay at where it first hit the ground, it will simply bounce off (the heavier the object the less the distance it bounce off to).

your argument is only correct if the dive is v1 style dive and let the engine turn off and the missile fall somewhere , not a controlled dive like shahed-136

lol, camera won't be blinded by the flash

it will be , that's a simple camera , not a fast camera designed for these scenario , in nights the diaphragm is wide open , a bright light , will blind it and it take time foe camera to adjust , if it have that capability , these cameras usually don't have it

Dude, you are moving your own argument trying to suit the situation, which is a sign you are losing said argument because if that is a fact, the goal post won't move, you won't have to change your argument to justify your point. You said you were a doctor?? Dude, how do you manage to get into Medical School with argument and logic like this? Did you do the same to your patient when you don't know why he/she is sick??

my argument never changed , the drone hit top of the building and made a bright flash that made the camera blind and then when camera could see again , you see the building on fire

Yes you are right.
Fajr rockets were also shot down.

probably yes , they are designed to be fired in hundreds not at most 3-5 like what palestinian do

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586029514844356609

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586019498909630464

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586021386715209737

 

[Hack-Hook]

mean, I wasn't going to argue with you because it's just one drone, whether it hit the target or got intercepted really not a big deal, I am simply telling you what I interpret as a former Military Intelligence officer with Damage Assessment experience, believe it or not is up to you, but dude, your argument is getting more ridiculous as you go. What next? The explosion wasn' captured by the camera at all or the shot is upside down or what??

honestly , there is no point in that discussion , that drone hit top of the building , if you put photo of such drone and said it was intercepted there wa no argument from me
this is interception (let not go into the fact its in front of green screen and the drone moved from another place there )

the video was actually hitting target

We saw a good example of the fighting spirit of Afghans when they ran from the Taliban last year.

two decades of being in usa camps .do that , the ones who escape were not the ones fighting USA and Nato

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586035150013419520

 

[Hack-Hook]

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/yf7lbi

certainly the missile hit several hundred meter away , the question is what was hit that they use two missile for it

Putin is no different to Stalin, he rules Russia with iron fist. Every opponent, every resistance is futile. People can expect millions of deaths either by famine, execution, deportation or simply disappear in Siberia gulags.

lol , no he is no where like Stalin , if he was like Stalin , he attacked both Ukraine and Finland and probably Uzbekistan with at least 3 million soldier .
and he would have sent anybody who was against the war to front-line , with their parents and children and spouse and probably their pets and grand parents .

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586020392044761089

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586039385845534720

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586033040501137409

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586037640515969025

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586039872783282176

https://twitter.com/x/status/1586035974148345861

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585989085663199232