you don't see fuel explosion because the camera is blinded after the impact and explosive explosion the fuel explosion is immediately after that , you can see its effect when camere again manage to get video in the form of the building be on fire
depend on the position of camera and how the drone come down , if it dive , the explosion lean toward nowhere
Dude, com'on....Now you are moving the goal post once again....
First you say "
your mistake is that because its above water line you think its above the ground"
Then I explained that water collect at the lowest spot on the ground, which is simple physics. Which mean if it is above waterline, then it is above ground."
Then you say "
drone hit top of the building , not first floor , and the explosion was at top of the buildings."
First, that's completely 180 degree turn from your previous comment (which is you thought it is at ground level, now you think it hit the building)
Then I explained that since that drone don't have optics and comm module, it most definitely will have an impact fuse, so when that drone hit the building, it will not have a second det like you claim before (another contradiction to what you have said)
And then I further explained that if that drone hits its target, the debris will carry the explosion forward (or whereever the drone goes) and the fireball will not be perfect ball shape, it will be leading toward the motion of travel.
Then now you say "
camera is blinded after the impact and explosive explosion the fuel explosion is immediately after that"
lol, camera won't be blinded by the flash, that's what flash do because the explosion will last a lot longer than the flash, and what is "If the drone dive, it goes no where?" Dude, even if it dive 90 degree straight down, the momentum will carry the drone forward to heavy side up. It's like if you drop something that have serious weight on the floor, once it hit the floor, it will NOT stay at where it first hit the ground, it will simply bounce off (the heavier the object the less the distance it bounce off to). That's because of Newton third law of motion, for every force there is a equal and opposite reaction force, and when that reaction force applies to the object being dropped on the floor, the momentum of the object will lead off the object. And If you had ever fire an explosive round straight down (like dropping a grenade on the floor), you will see the explosion will not just crater the floor, it will still have debris and each part will be flew off according to the size and weight.
Dude, you are moving your own argument trying to suit the situation, which is a sign you are losing said argument because if that is a fact, the goal post won't move, you won't have to change your argument to justify your point. You said you were a doctor?? Dude, how do you manage to get into Medical School with argument and logic like this? Did you do the same to your patient when you don't know why he/she is sick??
I mean, I wasn't going to argue with you because it's just one drone, whether it hit the target or got intercepted really not a big deal, I am simply telling you what I interpret as a former Military Intelligence officer with Damage Assessment experience, believe it or not is up to you, but dude, your argument is getting more ridiculous as you go. What next? The explosion wasn' captured by the camera at all or the shot is upside down or what??
