Russia Battles China Over Bangladesh

[Bond]

1) India killing thousands of Bangladeshis. - Stop entering in India illegally.. nobody will be shot..
2) India had been obstructing water in common rivers and destroying livelihood of hundrededs of million of Bangladeshis.- your daddy china is constructing move dams on the rive without even informing you; no cribbing there?
3) India occupying Banglsadeshi land and maritime EEZ territory - as always jamati bullshit knows no limits..

All these are done even when Awami League is in power which is indian subservient regime. Bangladesh internal politics has not been matter. Jamaat is a Bangladeshi political party and should irrelevant fact on india Bangladesh relation. What matter is Bangladesh interest and survival and india is threatening Bangladesh survival.

survival and india is threatening Bangladesh survival?? - so what are you going to do about it? send lungi army to destroy India?

 

[asad71]

How can 2 nuke power plants totally civilian in nature IAEA safeguards meant for non nuclear weapons country be a threat to India,BDeshi?

If China was building them there was still a question but our friend Russia is building this.

Many of us believe eventually it will be China who will build nuclear plants.

 

[neehar]

Never supported this chanakyan deal with awami malauns. Current Indo-awami deals is the same as US-karzai deals. SO your point being?

yeah ur the only intelligent person in ur country .ur country must have listened u and spend some billions for the cable network all the way from south china sea..to the bay of bengal and also ask them for the 15% of imports which ur country gets from india
South Asia - Bangladesh, India Trade
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/223546-1168296540386/ch2.pdf
India to increase wheat, rice export to Bangladesh

 

[Skallagrim]

there might be some differences between both the countries but its true that both are dependent on each other to considerable extent .our interest is ne states connectivity and ur interest is in trade and waters .so even at the most adverse situations theres not going to be a war between both..

What you said is true except the last sentence. You can never totally rule out the possibility of a war however you strive for peace. How many countries foresaw a war in distant and even near future!!?? So they prepare themselves and this is the point of raising a professional armed force.

 

[animelive]

This post shows your level of ignorance. After the collapse of the USSR, russia was literally bankrupt with their huge defence industry struggling to make ends meet due to miniscule local demand of the poorly funded Russian Military. Scientist were left unemployed & deserted. It was desperate times where they looked for buyers to sell their arms along with 100% TOT just to keep the industry & russian economy afloat. Chinese naturally took advantage of this opportunity and lots of top russian scientist moved on to china working in their defence projects. Kilo calls sub, Su27, Su 30, Tu bombers, USSR's 1/2 finished AC, S300, blueprints on Nuke subs based on which chinese type 94 sub was made- all of this were bought from collapsed Russia before 2001.They did all that with bussiness interest coupled with survival instinct . But what kind of an idiot would try to compare that with BD's arms market? Current Defence deals are not very well between russia & china considering surge in domestic procurement of a recovering russia.

Your ignorant argument suggest that we buy 4/5 Bn $$$ of arms from russia every year that they wouldn't pay heed to any diplomatic arm twisting by dadas. Case point, we bought our air defence system from China. As Kobirazz mentioned, just ask 80's version of S300s & see what happens.

And anyone would be dumbfounded by your argument of junk Migs. But then again U R an awamileaguer, no so surprise there. Fighters that can not be retrofitted into improved versions, has scarcity of supplies of spares for external factors, huge maintenance cost and the procurement of which was done without any consultation with AF just for the sake of wholesale corruption can only be floated as a pure business deal by awamileaguers or naive ignorant idiots.

Bringing up myths and lies just to justify your argument is nothing but a sign of narrow mindedness.



Yes, you R in reality by equating 8 junk migs with pure business interest Russia have with Dadas and had with china. I thank Allah(swt) that I am not in the type of reality U R in.

The fact that Chinese are still procuring arms from Russia(even the modern ones) makes all your "Russians were poor" argument invalid.

Again your brain farts, Russia never gives two **** about what goes in another part of the world as long as their arms sell. Show me one proof where they did before assuming your idiotic stuffs. And i will say it again, 2 s300 costs 300m, the reason we are not going for Russian arms is that single reason. Too expensive for us, right now.

What ever you call our Migs, they are still the most competent aircraft in our inventory.

Care to inform me about the lies i brought up? I actually post stuff that happened in reality, no matter what the reason. Whereas youa re floating in your clouds with F-16 dreams

 

[neehar]

What you said is true except the last sentence. You can never totally rule out the possibility of a war however you strive for peace. How many countries foresaw a war in distant and even near future!!?? So they prepare themselves and this is the point of raising a professional armed force.

u generalized my statement.i was speaking abt only bangladesh and india..yes wars do happen but it wont be a case here.because the first reason would be it risks the economy of india .we're in a path of growth we wouldnt risk a war..if at all such a situation arises india would choose other ways than a conventional wars like economy or waters..to hit bangladesh..

 

[T-Rex]

What ever you call our Migs, they are still the most competent aircraft in our inventory.

Out of those eight Mig-29s only two are flying, the rest have been grounded for quite sometime. Now, what's the point of having only two 'the most competent aircraft' in the air force? Would you please care to explain?