What's new

Featured Russia admitted that Pantsir-S1 missile systems are useless against Turkish drones

Theres is only one episode claimed to be from Libya shows one Pantsir being destroyed one second after it activates its radar.

Again go watch the evidence at Clash Report's channel. Don't tell yourself fairytales.
 
.
No matter what this member speaks. Russian SAMs were “pantsirred” in Syria and Libya. This guy was the one who claimed Turkish footages were fake/photoshoped/gameplay in operation times but at least, He has an excuse now. ☺️ In total, Turkey has destroyed ~25-26 Russian air defense systems and majority of them were Pantsirs.
 
.
So what we lost all of our UAV fleet in Libya? You donkeys were the ones who claimed that we lost more than 60 UAVs in Libya. GNA only lost 13-14 TB2s and some of them were due to maintanence problems. We destroyed almost 21-22 Pantsirs at total which is as much as your nonsense claims. You think your so smart that we'd not notice that LNA transported shot down UAVs from one place to another and claim multiple fake kills. Back in March you were so butthurt that you couldn't accept the fact that we destroyed 8 Pantsirs in Idlib even tho it was accepted by your own MFA :lol:

Clown, i just posted you the list of 21 unique shot down uavs in Libya all confirmed by pics and videos. The number of Pantsirs lost and confirmed is 8 in Libya(mostly destroyed in hangars and on trailes) and 2 in Syria. That are just facts. Instead of accepting reality you keep flattering your delusions.

No matter what this member speaks. Russian SAMs were “pantsirred” in Syria and Libya. This guy was the one who claimed Turkish footages were fake/photoshoped/gameplay in operation times but at least, He has an excuse now. ☺️ In total, Turkey has destroyed ~25-26 Russian air defense systems and majority of them were Pantsirs.

You forgot to mention 3500 Syrian soldiers, 200 tanks and 200 artillery :lol:
 
. .
You're just angry because you see how Turks slowly but surely overtake you in ever defence tech related field.
Turkey MIGHT have overtaken Iran in defense field, but TUrkey cant use its military equipment the way it really chooses, because daddy NATO willbe there to watch everything Turkey does. didnt you see France reporting Turkey to NATO recently? if your actions get too wild then NATO will put you on leash, which i suspect they will do soon.
Get used to it. Missile tech is basically your last area of expertise. Turks are coming, bruuu.
lmao. i'm sensing that you suspect Iranian weapons are fake. Luckily your military knows to stay clear and only challenges Iran via proxies. thats healthy competition that Iran is an expert at. US already had to kill some of your unreliable proxies in Idlib because they werent' following "orders."

Looks like this TUrkish drone knows how to stay out of Pantsir's radar range...i wonder if pantsir can be upgraded or modified to detect them better.
 
.
lmao. i'm sensing that you suspect Iranian weapons are fake. Luckily your military knows to stay clear and only challenges Iran via proxies. thats healthy competition that Iran is an expert at.
Why would Turkey directly(military) challenge Iran?? As far as I know there are no outstanding issues that require military action against Iran(for now)
Regarding this proxy argument it is actually Iran who only uses proxies against their rivals/adversaries
I forgot to ask
what kind of proxies Turkey is utilizing against Iran??
 
.
what kind of proxies Turkey is utilizing against Iran??

nothing

iran is the only player in our region wich is in a secterian war.. their struggle is secterian and for their economy while in real life no one in the world except some arab nations have issues with this secterian stuff we may disagree but we donnt have hostile feelings except for their selfmade actions.. and this wont change no matter what they try to let their ppl belive..
 
.
nothing

iran is the only player in our region wich is in a secterian war.. their struggle is secterian and for their economy while in real life no one in the world except some arab nations have issues with this secterian stuff we may disagree but we donnt have hostile feelings except for their selfmade actions.. and this wont change no matter what they try to let their ppl belive..
I know but still waiting for his interesting reply ;)
 
.
@Ansu fati

Ther number 1 export product....

080623%20hassan.jpg
 
.
To be honest for me entire world's SAMs are useless for example:
KSA multiple times failed to stop drones and missile attacks with USA tech.
Syrian air defence unable to stop Israel, Turkish attacks.
Iran shot down their own passengers plan with SAM.
India shot down thier own chopper with Israel tech.
Forget Yemen and Russian SAMs.
I think this is the reason Pakistan didn't focused so much on SAM systems.
 
.
I think this is the reason Pakistan didn't focused so much on SAM systems.

Pakistans Jf17 is the best Pakistan could do! Pakistan needs Strike Capabilities the next would be to build long range AA Missles I dont know if there is a program but a licenced turkish or chinese version would also be good instead of buying..

I do not know if pakistan can get PL21? that would be a good option too licence for pl12 also some pl15 would be great for pakistan.. maybe pak can get pl21? also some cruise missles against radar systems and we can say all this is better than sam systems for Pakistan.. of course it wouod be great to have Multi LAyered SAM systems but it is not worth something without the proper air fleet

also we can say for iran it has no meaning to buy great fighter jets.. because their threat is far bigger than what pakistan face.. their enemy is EU/US Israel if they all attack Iran even if Iran would have 250 SU35 with latest Russian AA missles it would have no meaning.. they would be soon decimated and they way for destruction would be clean..

what I want to say is Irans strategy to have serious long range Missles for striking and some air defence systems is for them enough and cheaper they can make the price high for a possible attack.. also their air force is enough for their country and against terrorist entities and other small threads... focusing on drones is cheaper and better for them..
 
.
I think this is the reason Pakistan didn't focused so much on SAM systems.
SAMs are not useless if used correctly, which is against a force with a far greater air force then your own. Russia uses SAMs bc their air force will never be able to compete with NATOs.
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom