RSS men, in a fresh row, claim Taj a Shiva temple

[syedali73]

The only reason Taj is still spared from the fanatic Hindutvawadi is because it is a cash cow unlike Babri mosque that was not earning any dollars.

 

[nik141991]

The only reason Taj is still spared from the fanatic Hindutvawadi is because it is a cash cow unlike Babri mosque that was not earning any dollars.

Yes otherwise Hindu fanatic like me would have blown it down just like one of my nebhigour do on regular basis

 

[jamahir]

The only reason Taj is still spared from the fanatic Hindutvawadi is because it is a cash cow unlike Babri mosque that was not earning any dollars.

not really... there is some secularism in india whether coming from nehru's half-steps or from bollywood or from the socialism awareness that was there in the initial four decades or from the british-created bureaucracy.

What's the technical implication and why don't you agree given your last statement?

the technical implication being that i can be seen validating susu's words... what i declared were my own words from being a muslim socialist who can be a near-future leader of muslims.

 

[Donatello]

Online preachers come from all nations to preach on PDF Don. No need to take offense at them. Just pass them a few rupees and move on. You will surely be blessed in heaven for doing so

Blessed to Heaven or Blessed in Heaven? Need to pack my baggage accordingly.

 

[kṣamā]

Aerial view of the Taj Mahal.


The interior water well



Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome



Close up of the dome with pinnacle



Close up of the pinnacle



Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard



Red lotus at apex of the entrance



Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments

 

[kṣamā]

View of sealed doors & windows in back



Typical Vedic style corridors



The Music House–a contradiction



A locked room on upper floor



A marble apartment on ground floor



The OM in the flowers on the walls



Staircase that leads to the lower levels



300 foot long corridor inside apartments

 

[kṣamā]

One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level



Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms



Interior of another of the locked rooms



Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room



Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks



Secret walled door that leads to other rooms



Secret bricked door that hides more evidence



Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died

 

[kṣamā]

Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried



NOW READ THIS…….

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz’s tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz’s burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak’s inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term ” Mahal ” has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria .. “The unusual explanation that the term TajMahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani,” he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters ‘Mum’ from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.”Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva’s Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan’s time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan’s era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz’s death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an
English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan’s time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan’s time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi’s government t ried to have Prof. Oak’s book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the
first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak’s research.

Open all sealed rooms in front of media. Let experts investigate

 

[SecularNationalist]

Another day in india under the rule of bhartiya joker party
Stop whining and say thanks to the muslim civilization which gave you such a beautiful architecture.

 

[kṣamā]

More On this topic: Taj Mahal - वेद Veda

 

[ravi kiran]

says the chap with a big saffron "om" as his profile-picture.

oh... that was a joke, was it??

No that wasn't joke.
I am proud Hindu. Extreme nationalist. But i am not religious fanatic.

 

[kṣamā]

Another day in india under the rule of bhartiya joker party
Stop whining and say thanks to the muslim civilization which gave you such a beautiful architecture.

We are thankful to Muslim ruler for many things(eg: Fantastic Cuisine, Languages and Technologies ) but this is not one of them. Please go through some literature on this topic and then we can have a civilized discussion.

 

[Samandri]

As it is not a mosque, so Hindus are welcomed to raze it to the ground. Tombs over graves not allowed in Islam.

 

[syedali73]

As it is not a mosque, so Hindus are welcomed to raze it to the ground. Tombs over graves not allowed in Islam.

When you are razing Roza-e-Rasool (PBUH)? well wrong question I guess; who is he (PBUH) to you!

Let me ask a more relevant question: When are you razing Ahmad Shah Abdali's tomb?

 

[Samandri]

When you are razing Roza-e-Rasool (PBUH)?

Taj Mahal is not roza-e-rasool, dont get sentimental