What's new

A Hindu temple that could fit 200 Taj Mahals in it

Mongols never conquered the true heartland of Arabia which included Makkah and Medina and were swiftly handed over their arse when they conspired with the Christians against us yet we defeated them both comparing the Arabs with Hindus is an insult to Arabs.

Arabs were the first to give Mongols their proper defeat which marked their downfall.

Battle of Ain Jalut was probably the greatest battle fought on the Arabian Peninsula after the holy battles of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH in Ain Jalut when the Sultan Baibars charged alone seeing the large hordes of Mongols he was screaming Wah Islama Wah Islama translation is Oh My Islam Oh My Islam and he fell upon the Mongols like lightening and butchered em along with their leader no Randian has the right to compare themselves with Arabians.

They were not Arabs, they were Mamlukes who were decendents of central Asians.

Pakistanis invent history for themselves.
 
.
They were not Arabs, they were Mamlukes who were decendents of central Asians.

Pakistanis invent history for themselves.
I am well aware of Mamluks and other Janissaries I don't need a spastic Indian to point that out the least of your worries should be sticking to google web searches.

The only people inventing history are landians be it from the first Afghan/Turk raids to the Mughals don't come here talking smack landian just because u spent 3 minutes on google busting ur arse.
 
.
Pakistanis invent history for themselves.
Have some pity for some of them. It wasn't their choice to be born into their nationality. If these people had a choice, they would have chosen to be born Arab, Turk, Persian or Afghan

Their history is a sad story 2400 years of subjugation from Achaemenids in 535 BC to British till 1947 AD
Starting 2 centuries before Alexander's invasion
Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley
1664846242781.png


Only means to soothe multiple millenniums pathetic history of servility is to delude themselves that they are same people that invaded, butchered, enslaved and subjugated them
Each influential ethnic group in the Islamic world Arabs, Turks and Persian mock them for this primitive apish behavior

With a 2400 rich history of foreign rule, the future is set for 2400 year continued foreign intervention maybe USA and China are up for this
 
.
I am well aware of Mamluks and other Janissaries I don't need a spastic Indian to point that out the least of your worries should be sticking to google web searches.

The only people inventing history are landians be it from the first Afghan/Turk raids to the Mughals don't come here talking smack landian just because u spent 3 minutes on google busting ur arse.

my pity!
 
.
Have some pity for some of them. It wasn't their choice to be born into their nationality. If these people had a choice, they would have chosen to be born Arab, Turk, Persian or Afghan

Their history is a sad story 2400 years of subjugation from Achaemenids in 535 BC to British till 1947 AD
Starting 2 centuries before Alexander's invasion
Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley
View attachment 884493

Only means to soothe multiple millenniums pathetic history of servility is to delude themselves that they are same people that invaded, butchered, enslaved and subjugated them
Each influential ethnic group in the Islamic world Arabs, Turks and Persian mock them for this primitive apish behavior

With a 2400 rich history of foreign rule, the future is set for 2400 year continued foreign intervention maybe USA and China are up for this
The 2 nation theory is there for a reason average Pakistani has more DNA diversity than Indians and less Subcontinental DNA as a whole except Churas, the only pity in this whole scenario is Hindus getting their arse kicked for over a thousand years and losing their western Hindu influence which continues till date this also further the suggests that the average Indian is low caste Onge ancestry and that explains the whole Sanghi looks they have 🤣🤣


Pakistan is equally thankful when Landians come out and acknowledge that we are different from street shitt*ng landians to the East and don't forget that Pagan Dharmis like urself have lived under the same feet of ours for centuries so it's a bit rich when a Sanghi chadi wearer comes along in his 1-minute glory to call us slaves 🤣🤣

Rather than being thankful to ur masters for saving ur arse against Mongols and other external forces here, we have a Saffron Chadi wearer giving counterclaims like his ancestors were not getting love Zihad by so-called invaders 🤣🤣 i mean if you had any historical knowledge rather than a vegetarian google search history you would know that Ding Ling milk pourers were kicked out of western region by the Indigenous Sultanates.

But yeah that would be hard to digest by Landians who like to manipulate historical facts and claim victories in textbooks and Bollywood films whilst screaming chatrapuddi Mahraj ki Jai 🤣🤣

the only people who are truly worthy of the scum of the Earth award are Indians.

@lastofthepatriots @Maula Jatt @Mentee
 
Last edited:
.
Have some pity for some of them. It wasn't their choice to be born into their nationality. If these people had a choice, they would have chosen to be born Arab, Turk, Persian or Afghan

Considering that you are also a lorusingham from South India

Do you have anything to share about these tuttum puttum temples in chutyapuram of South India that are far more grand than Taj Mahal as the OP says?
 
. .
They accept it when it comes to accepting tourism revenue but at the same reject it in the name of hindutva. What a shameless lot.

This is Jodha Bai's Hindu mandir inside the Zenana of Fatehpur Sikri. She was the wife of Akbar and mother of Jahangir. These Hindutva idiots conveniently forget the role of Jodha bai in Mughal history. Jodha Bai's Mughal name was Maryam-uz-Zamani.

Manbhawati (Man) Bai,[1] was the daughter of Raja Bhagwant Das, the ruler of Amer.[2] She was the granddaughter of Raja Bharmal and sister of Raja Man Singh and Raja Madho Singh. Furthermore, she was also a niece of Mariam-uz-Zamani who eventually became her mother-in-law as well, by her arranged marriage to Jahangir.[3]

Jodha Bai's father Raja Bharmal, after her marriage to Akbar, was immediately made the commander of 5000 cavalry units, the highest rank that could be held by the noble in the court.[68] Mariam-uz-Zamani's brother Bhagwant Das in the year 1585, became commander of 5000 cavalry units and bore the proud title Amir-ul-Umra (Chief Noble). His son, Man Singh I, rose even higher to become commander of 7000 forces which was at par with the mansab of royal princes. Akbar referred to Raja Man Singh as his farzand(son).[69] The Mughals ultimately accepted Hindus as their own relatives, but Hindu hatred for Mughals lives on even in 2022.

Where is this width of heart among Hindutvas of today that Akbar (and his descendant Mughal emperors) had for marrying so many Rajput princesses and how that benefitted so many Rajput clans in so many immeasurable ways?

Jodha Bai
1664864999610.png


Jodha Bai's temple exterior in Fatehpur Sikri
1664864971040.png


1664867424319.png


Jodha Bai's temple interior in Fatehpur Sikri
1664867590617.png



Tomb of Man Bai
1664867822634.png



Mariam-uz-zamani's Tomb Agra

This is the place where the Queen Mariam Zamani wife of Emperor Akbar and Mother of Jahangir are resting forever. People get confused by the name that she was a Mughal but she was a Hindu and Daughter of King Bharmal of Rajasthan .

Her name as recorded in Mughal chronicles was Mariam-uz-Zamani. This is why the mosque of Mariam-Uz-Zamani Begum was constructed in Lahore, Pakistan, in her honor. She has been also referred to as Jodha Bai or Jodhabai in modern times. Hira Kunwar, Akbar's first Rajput wife, was the eldest daughter of Raja Bhar Mal of Amber. She was also the sister of Bhagwandas and the aunt of Man Singh I of Amber, who later became one the nine jewels (Navaratnas) in the court of Akbar.

The Mosque of Mariyam Zamani Begum was built by her son Nuruddin Salim Jahangir and is situated in the Walled City of Lahore, Pakistan, while Mariam's Tomb is situated one km away from Tomb of Akbar the Great, at Sikandra, Agra.

Akbar the great's tomb

2012-0504
Akbars_Tomb_Sikandra_Agra_India_%283%29.JPG
2012-0501

2012-0505

2012-0503
Nikhil Chandra Blog: You Only think twice

collage+5.jpg

Sikandra is a fitting commemoration to one of the greatest Emperors to have ruled India. The life and achievements of Akbar, arguably the greatest Mughal Emperor, was the stuff legends are made of. Admired and loved by both Hindus and Muslims, Akbar was adored by his subject and happened to an artist of considerable skill himself.
 
.
Well the Hindu ancestors of Pakistanis fought off and fought well for three long centuries till they lost to Ghaznavis and then Rajput fought till the end of 12th centuary when Ghori won Delhi. Yes, they couldn't save those majnificent Hindu temples, still their bravery have contributed in keeping today's India Hindu majority.

I'm frm south East India, most of our Hindu temples are intact becasue we fought off the Muslim invaders successfully except the Mughals and lost out freemdom to them for 200yrs.
I am actually very surprised you knew that or knew what was happening at the time especially considering you are from southern India

Rajput clans of Potohar till the 1200s according to Persian historians who visited the area were known for their persecution against and dislike for Muslims (since he was a Muslim, so he painted these clans in a very negative light as infidel barbarians, same as brahmins of Ganges valley who also disliked them cause they didn't follow their authority, ate meat stuff like that etc), for 3-4 centuries potohar was in constant turmoil as the tribes and Turks were going back and forth- Ghori was killed in Potohar by a tribe whose member he had enslaved, so the region at the time was very unstable, this instability held em down
Turkic attacks began in the late 8th century (not Muslims at the time) and the Delhi sultanate (Turk sultanate) was founded in the 1200s - then from that point onwards till brits, Muslims ruled Delhi

By 12th-13th century, the tribes of Pothaar became Muslims at the hands of Baba Ganjshakar (and some others) because stories of his miracles/spiritual prowess spread around the region making him into a larger-than-life figure which led to mass conversions

at the time the area was barely populated (no brits canal systems) outside of a couple of cities, still despite its low population punched above its weight in terms of its historical contribution to arts, science, education, etc

Have some pity for some of them. It wasn't their choice to be born into their nationality. If these people had a choice, they would have chosen to be born Arab, Turk, Persian or Afghan

Their history is a sad story 2400 years of subjugation from Achaemenids in 535 BC to British till 1947 AD
Starting 2 centuries before Alexander's invasion
Achaemenid conquest of the Indus Valley
View attachment 884493

Only means to soothe multiple millenniums pathetic history of servility is to delude themselves that they are same people that invaded, butchered, enslaved and subjugated them
Each influential ethnic group in the Islamic world Arabs, Turks and Persian mock them for this primitive apish behavior

With a 2400 rich history of foreign rule, the future is set for 2400 year continued foreign intervention maybe USA and China are up for this
A- you're from the ganges right - I don't even think you should be talking about it... I mean open up the books maybe lol

- Literally most of your major castes/clans known for martial recruitment are 300-1000 years old max migrants from this region - from jats to gujjars, I think even some Rajput clans are also migrants - it's weird for you to make them your Frontline soldiers if you are some warrior gangetics...

- you can even see the attitude difference between the two people lol, probably the most hardcore people of South Asia, from Canada to UK when south Asian people were getting killed by neo Nazis only pakistani diaspora had balls to beat them up and make it safe for other south Asians, I didn't see any Indian besides probably Sikhs standing up against the neo Nazis?- even forigners see the difference in attitude lol and here you trying to be some macho dumpling
 
Last edited:
.
They were not Arabs, they were Mamlukes who were decendents of central Asians.

Pakistanis invent history for themselves.

Mamluks were under the religious authority of the Abbasid Arab Caliphs that after the Sack of Baghdad in 1258 had moved to Cairo. Most of the army were local Arabs.

Besides there were Arab Mamluk rulers too. Most of the Mamluks were Circassian. Rest Kipchak Turk (slaves captured by Arabs from Central Asia - modern day Kazakhstan mostly).


Also they were fully Arabized. Names, religion, customs, title (Sultan), land etc. was Arab.

Also Arabs and Turks defeated the Mongols in Levant in 1260 so Mongol presence in the Arab world was short and limited to Iraq.


For instance the Mongols did far more harm in what is contemporary India, Pakistan and Iran. Killing millions in the process. Mughals themselves were Mongol in origin.

Brihadeeshwara temple constructed by the Chola dynasty in the 11th century is an architectural marvel,much before the Mughals invaded India. This Temple by chola dynasty has the area to fit 200 Taj Mahals and the complex used more stones than the Pyramids of Gaza.


While this is impressive architecture, it just speaks volume of the degree of slavery used to built this and extreme opulence of the local rulers. If someone attempted to build anything remotely similar today, they would be laughed at.

This is what a large population (at that time too) allowed autocratic rulers to do.

That Hindu temple is smaller than TajMahal that is build by Muslim Invader (Mughal).

Even your Hindu temple made in 11 Century is still smaller than Borobudur temple (Budhist) made by Indonesian in 8 century.


I thought so. So in other words, the presenter is making nonsense up of that temple being 14 times larger than the Taj Mahal?

Also speaking about Hindu monuments/temples, the most impressive ones seem to be in modern-day Burma, Indonesia, Cambodia etc., not India.
 
Last edited:
.
- Literally most of your major castes/clans known for martial recruitment are 300-1000 years old max migrants from this region - from jats to gujjars, I think even some Rajput clans are also migrants - it's weird for you to make them your Frontline soldiers if you are some warrior gangetics...
LOL! You know East India company won the Indian subcontinent with sepoys recruited from from Bengal, UP, Bihar and South India.
None of the those sepoys were from so called martial races, not even Marathas or Gurkhas, forget pathans or Sikhs.


you can even see the attitude difference between the two people lol, probably the most hardcore people of South Asia, from Canada to UK when south Asian people were getting killed by neo Nazis only pakistani diaspora had balls to beat them up and make it safe for other south Asians, I didn't see any Indian besides probably Sikhs standing up against the neo Nazis?- even forigners see the difference in attitude lol and here you trying to be some macho dumpling
LOL! Again you want to take Gujaratis merchant class patel Hindus as representation of all India masses, you couldn't be more wrong.

If given a chance largest chunck of populatio, Sudhra castes from south India and UP/Biharis or tribal from Eastern India can eat alive any of the socalled martial races or any pakistani for that matter. These people live and work in 50'c climate all around the year.
 
.
Considering that you are also a lorusingham from South India

Do you have anything to share about these tuttum puttum temples in chutyapuram of South India that are far more grand than Taj Mahal as the OP says?
Ask your grandpa, since he was a migratory "lorusingham" from South India
 
.
Feel good stories nothing else.
I mean if you had any historical knowledge you would know that the Potohar Plateu is probably as ancient as the Scythians themselves the tribes of Potohar like Janjua, Khokhars, Ghakkars etc have been documented by all invading forces from Alexander to Mughals they have been documented like no tribes other across the subcontinent.

The Potohar Region gave everyone a tough fight and were known as meat eating rude drunkards who hated Brahmins its even written in Vedic Hymns these are not feel good stories but the bloody history of this land.

Even during British rule these clans of Potohar were recruited in mass for the British army Modern Day Pakistani Muslims were the most recruited in British Indian army. Theres a certain tribe called the Tiwanas these guys were the elite of the elite of British Cavalry whenever they recruited Tiwanas it was always for Cavalry.

LOL! Again you want to take Gujaratis merchant class patel Hindus as representation of all India masses, you couldn't be more wrong.

If given a chance largest chunck of populatio, Sudhra castes from south India and UP/Biharis or tribal from Eastern India can eat alive any of the socalled martial races or any pakistani for that matter. These people live and work in 50'c climate all around the year.
Going be your dumb logic Onge people will be the most ruthless since they live in 55c climate 😂😂😂 How dumb can you get 😂 you get your shudras and ill get some churas 😂😂 ya f*cking no brain cells b*st*rd 😂😂😂
 
. .
Destroying Pagan Idols is our God-given right its like when the Hindus pour milk over that ding ling.

Are You really Serious ???

33361.jpg



There is wonderful history in which century the Lingams were Established !!!

Vedic Researchers do have different explanation that Lingams were not there during the Era of Bhagwanam Shree Ram
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom